SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-12-09, 03:13 PM   #1
Aramike
Ocean Warrior

Best of SUBSIM
Chairman
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 3,207
Downloads: 59
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tchocky View Post
Aramike, I'm not laying any sort of trap. I want to know if August would approve of torture. Simple as.

That you think there is a semantic trap here is, I think, illustrative of the Bush Administrations attempts in this area, whether you meant it or not.
"We want to torture people, but we're not allowed. Let's find a way to torture someone while calling it something else. Lawyers, write us a definition please."

The US Gov't signed the Convention Against Torture, you can take the definition therein to be tacitly accepted by almost every nation on Earth.
You are correct - I do believe that the Bush administration did try to redefine torture so that the methods that needed to be employed were legal.

And I agree with that.

Look, we're talking about innocent, civilian lives and people who are hell bent in taking them. Those people will use any method - including torture - INDISCRIMINATELY to cause terror and disrupt/destroy our way of life.

We're not talking about tank formations on a battlefield. This is about one guy with a backpack containing a dirty bomb walking into NYC. The game has changed, along with the rules. The Bush Administration realized that. Obama along with the very left-leaning UN does not.

The fact that they wish to gamble with the lives of civilians in order to attempt to make a political statement is wrong.

Waterboarding someone who knows information that can save lives, and will not disclose it, is not wrong. Preventing the extraction of such information, especially for mere political gain, is MORALLY DEPRAVED.
Aramike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-09, 03:16 PM   #2
AVGWarhawk
Lucky Jack
 
AVGWarhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: In a 1954 Buick.
Posts: 28,293
Downloads: 90
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Waterboarding someone who knows information that can save lives, and will not disclose it, is not wrong. Preventing the extraction of such information, especially for mere political gain, is MORALLY DEPRAVED.
I would buy this line of thinking.
__________________
“You're painfully alive in a drugged and dying culture.”
― Richard Yates, Revolutionary Road
AVGWarhawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-09, 03:26 PM   #3
heartc
Samurai Navy
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Munich
Posts: 562
Downloads: 71
Uploads: 0
Default

BTW, they can really stop doing it now anyway. Many of the techniques were psychological in nature in that they were suggestive to the detainee that there is worse to come. Shock and surprise. Now that the formerly TOP SECRET documents have all been disclosed to the public, those techniques are useless now. Yeah, guess why they were TOP SECRET. Not just because it is a difficult subject and the evil Bush admin didn't want you to know - the Bush admin / CIA didn't want THEM to know that the techniques are not just the beginning, but in reality the last resort.

So just scrap the whole thing now and "hang" a few people for political effect, at least that will be funny to watch.
__________________

heartc is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.