The Livni fiasco and the hypocrisy of UN edicts

[Skybird]

Originally Posted by Happy Times

Islam isnt a race.

Im my books its an political ideology, right there with communism, nazism, anachism etc..

For me islam is more political ideology than religion, too, and certainly no race, however, let's be precise, else one makes it easy for pro-islamists to hit back.

Communism in theory and practice has been different things, but both have in common to claim they hold the ultimate truth. In practice, it mostly has been dictatorship, and better functioning we have seen it only on very small, local scale, in a Kibbuz-sized sort of model (not only in Israel). Nazism also claims to have th eultimate truth, and it has seen a totalitarian control by the state as we have seen in communism made in USSR and in many earthly implementations of communism as well. Additionally Nazism sees close links to fascism for historic reasons, but the blackskirt were there first and fascism originates from a typical italian context, and not every totalitarianism is fascism or communism (in case of Germany and the USSR it was, however). Anarchism does not know any governmental control and central instance of authority, it means the absence of any rules and control and is simply the law of the jungle: the stronger does as he pleases, the weaker gets eaten.

Islam is neither nazism nor communism in ideologic orientation and content, but it is totalitarian in central control and authority of it's central rules and laws, and in social and political acting it also subjugates the individual to the community and the dogma. This totalitarian structure it shares with Nazism and the Soviet Union-model of communism.

Islam accepts only the greater strength of opposition to bring it's advance to a temporary hold, but advances if itself shows to be stronger in expansive power than the defenders of foreign places. In that it seems to be anarchism, but different to that it sees a very strong centralised power: it's rules and laws, the dogma. So it cannot be anarchism.

It also is no the italian black shirts, obviously.

1. It is totalitarianism.
2. It is aggressive in claiming world dominance as it's evolutional goal and God-wanted natural claim.
3. It is agggressively expansionistic.

plus:

4. Like any tyrannic political ideology and like any theistic religion, it want's man to be unfree and submitting to it's claims for power (the "faith").

But Islam is not Nazism, communism, anarchism or fascism.

The debate has nothing to do with racism or freedom of religious practicing. These claims just get instrumentalised to give people critical of islamisation or the church's demands for communal influence and political power a bad name. That the church helps islam in europe is for bringing all people under control of relgious influence again - it is not by random chance, but calculation.