![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#11 | |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: May 2008
Location: Storming the beaches!
Posts: 4,254
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Firstly, there's the effect of dumping up to 12 million additional people onto social programs like medicare, medicaid, and social security all at once. Social Security alone is going to bankrupt the country within a few decades at the rate we're going. Of course, that asumes that they're all willing to pay fines to become citizens, some may choose to remain illegal. And what would amnesty tell other potential illegals? Break the law long enough and you'll be fine? Coupled with revolving-door deportation, it hardly seems practicable. Secondly, there is also the cost of maintaining border security. Yeah we sort of have a fence, but it has to be monitored or it is just a speedbump. Illegal immigrants have repeatedly demonstrated their will to bypass localized monitoring, even when it means possibly dying in the desert. And the border is like 2000 miles long. And there's also the coast. Trying to dam up the border would be tremendously expensive in terms of both initial capital and annual operating expenses. Regulating employers also costs a lot of money. Inspectors would be needed. More bureacracy would be needed to support them. We both know that if there is one thing the government has ever done well, it is to make huge bureacracies. And on top of that we have a new system for verifying immigration status? God only know what that will cost, but it's a certainty that it won't work the way it is supposed to. -This applies to CH, too Thirdly, cracking down on employers who hire illegal immigrants isn't going to help anyone. As previously stated, illegals mostly fufill jobs no one wants anyways. The thing that riles everybody is the costs they incur on various state budgets. Plus we'd shut down a lot of small business that relies on cheap labor to exsist. That means less choice for consumers. It also means less jobs for legal workers or citizens in some cases. Take away their public benefits and then just let the market work. Even if there is a huge influx of immigrants, they'd have little effect on public spending and their wages would be driven down to the point that most would just go home. If illegals decide they don't want to work for less than everyone else the system automatically adjusts to either offer them more pay, or meet the wage/benefit demands of the legal labor pool. There might not be a perfect solution, but that doesn't mean we can't have a solution that works well.
__________________
![]() I stole this sig from Task Force ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|