SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-09-09, 07:14 PM   #1
UnderseaLcpl
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Storming the beaches!
Posts: 4,254
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Platapus View Post
Well there probably is no perfect solution to the "immigration problem" . At least I have not read of any solution that is perfect.

"In broad outlines, officials said, the Obama administration favors legislation that would bring illegal immigrants into the legal system by recognizing that they violated the law, and imposing fines and other penalties to fit the offense. The legislation would seek to prevent future illegal immigration by strengthening border enforcement and cracking down on employers who hire illegal immigrants, while creating a national system for verifying the legal immigration status of new workers."

As an imperfect solution this one does not sound all that bad.
I agree that there is no perfect solution, but Obama's plan is unsustainable and idealistic.
Firstly, there's the effect of dumping up to 12 million additional people onto social programs like medicare, medicaid, and social security all at once. Social Security alone is going to bankrupt the country within a few decades at the rate we're going.
Of course, that asumes that they're all willing to pay fines to become citizens, some may choose to remain illegal. And what would amnesty tell other potential illegals? Break the law long enough and you'll be fine?
Coupled with revolving-door deportation, it hardly seems practicable.

Secondly, there is also the cost of maintaining border security. Yeah we sort of have a fence, but it has to be monitored or it is just a speedbump. Illegal immigrants have repeatedly demonstrated their will to bypass localized monitoring, even when it means possibly dying in the desert.
And the border is like 2000 miles long. And there's also the coast.
Trying to dam up the border would be tremendously expensive in terms of both initial capital and annual operating expenses.
Regulating employers also costs a lot of money. Inspectors would be needed. More bureacracy would be needed to support them.
We both know that if there is one thing the government has ever done well, it is to make huge bureacracies. And on top of that we have a new system for verifying immigration status? God only know what that will cost, but it's a certainty that it won't work the way it is supposed to.

-This applies to CH, too
Thirdly, cracking down on employers who hire illegal immigrants isn't going to help anyone. As previously stated, illegals mostly fufill jobs no one wants anyways. The thing that riles everybody is the costs they incur on various state budgets. Plus we'd shut down a lot of small business that relies on cheap labor to exsist. That means less choice for consumers. It also means less jobs for legal workers or citizens in some cases.

Take away their public benefits and then just let the market work. Even if there is a huge influx of immigrants, they'd have little effect on public spending and their wages would be driven down to the point that most would just go home. If illegals decide they don't want to work for less than everyone else the system automatically adjusts to either offer them more pay, or meet the wage/benefit demands of the legal labor pool.

There might not be a perfect solution, but that doesn't mean we can't have a solution that works well.
__________________

I stole this sig from Task Force
UnderseaLcpl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-09, 08:11 PM   #2
Platapus
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 19,402
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by UnderseaLcpl View Post
I agree that there is no perfect solution, but Obama's plan is unsustainable and idealistic.

Considering that we don't know exactly what President Obama's plan is, this is all a lot of guesswork.

I will wait until I see what the plan is before I will form an opinion.

The "broad outline" is what we have but I need to see the details before I can opine whether it is sustainable or unsustainable.
__________________
abusus non tollit usum - A right should NOT be withheld from people on the basis that some tend to abuse that right.
Platapus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-09, 08:19 PM   #3
Neptunus Rex
Frogman
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 294
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

I might support if;

1) They honestly declare when they actually entered the USA.
2) They pay all back taxes on all income earned during that time.
3) Pay the interest and penalty for not paying the taxes.
4) Pay a penalty for having entered illegally.
5) Pay back for any services received.

Wow, I just realized that 2,3, and 4 are the eligibility criteria for becoming a part of the Obama administration.

__________________
Neptunus Rex sends

"In the spirit of reaching across the aisle, we owe it to the Democrats to show their president the exact same kind of respect and loyalty that they have shown our recent Republican president." A.C. 11-5-08
Neptunus Rex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-09, 10:19 PM   #4
SteamWake
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 13,224
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neptunus Rex View Post
I might support if;

1) They honestly declare when they actually entered the USA.
2) They pay all back taxes on all income earned during that time.
3) Pay the interest and penalty for not paying the taxes.
4) Pay a penalty for having entered illegally.
5) Pay back for any services received.

Wow, I just realized that 2,3, and 4 are the eligibility criteria for becoming a part of the Obama administration.

Eeven No. 1 has been debated.
__________________
Follow the progress of Mr. Mulligan : http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=147648
SteamWake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-09, 09:34 PM   #5
UnderseaLcpl
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Storming the beaches!
Posts: 4,254
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Platapus View Post
Considering that we don't know exactly what President Obama's plan is, this is all a lot of guesswork.

I will wait until I see what the plan is before I will form an opinion.

The "broad outline" is what we have but I need to see the details before I can opine whether it is sustainable or unsustainable.
I can certainly respect such objectivity. However, I cannot share your optimism that a successful plan might be developed using any of his guidelines. The idea that congress, of all people, would come up with an innovative way to avoid the harms I outlined in Obama's general plan, especially given the polarizing nature of the issue, is laughable to me.
It's hard to say that without sounding insulting, but I mean no disrespect.
__________________

I stole this sig from Task Force
UnderseaLcpl is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.