![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 |
Willing Webfooted Beast
|
![]()
As an aircraft addict, it's really annoying for me when I'm leaving base and see what the game SAYS is a Junkers Ju88 because I'm like "Oh look! It's a Ju188...2 years to early." or "Alarm! We are being attacked by a PBY Catalina... With... Three engines!?" are there any mods out there that could correct these inaccurisies?
__________________
Historical TWoS Gameplay Guide: http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?p=2572620 Historical FotRSU Gameplay Guide: https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/sho....php?p=2713394 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: CJ8937
Posts: 8,215
Downloads: 793
Uploads: 10
|
![]() Quote:
As for the Ju88/Ju188 issue, I think it would be enough changing the respective entry in the roster. Wile we are waiting for Trevally to release a small patch for it, you can correct the mistake yourself. Just open Names.cfg file, under data/Roster folder, and change this row: LBJu88=Ju 88 Bomber to: LBJu88=Ju 188 Bomber or whatever else you want ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]() Easy to fix ![]() Open - data\Air\AS_USFloatEarlyWar\AS_USFloatEarlyWar.cfg Change this:- ; Stand in for Catalina [Unit] ClassName=SUSFloatEarlyWar 3DModelFileName=data/Air/AS_USFloatEarlyWar/FloatingPlane UnitType=304 MaxSpeed=169 MinSpeed=60 MaxRadius=1600 Length=19.5 Width=31.7 RenownAwarded=40 CrewComplement=8 SurvivalRate=60 SurvivalPercentage=70 [Loadout 1] Name=1xDepth Charge Type=5 To this:- ; Stand in for Catalina [Unit] ClassName=SUSFloatEarlyWar 3DModelFileName=data/Air/AS_USFloatEarlyWar/AS_USFloatEarlyWar UnitType=304 MaxSpeed=169 MinSpeed=60 MaxRadius=1600 Length=19.5 Width=31.7 RenownAwarded=40 CrewComplement=8 SurvivalRate=60 SurvivalPercentage=70 [Loadout 1] Name=1xDepth Charge Type=5 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: CJ8937
Posts: 8,215
Downloads: 793
Uploads: 10
|
![]() ![]() trying to answer your riddle.... ...racking my brain on it... ![]() ...okay, I just had a burst of inspiration: bad collaborators maybe? ![]() ![]() Last edited by gap; 08-07-12 at 12:35 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]()
I don't think even Bletchley Park can crack this one
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() Yip - that might do it ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Willing Webfooted Beast
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Historical TWoS Gameplay Guide: http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?p=2572620 Historical FotRSU Gameplay Guide: https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/sho....php?p=2713394 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Willing Webfooted Beast
|
OMGoodness
What the fork(a utensil for eating)! i just noticed that the italian Z501,is,ingame, a Short Sunderland! how could ubisoft miss that!
![]()
__________________
Historical TWoS Gameplay Guide: http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?p=2572620 Historical FotRSU Gameplay Guide: https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/sho....php?p=2713394 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: CJ8937
Posts: 8,215
Downloads: 793
Uploads: 10
|
![]() Quote:
I am afraid it is not a mistake anyway: there is already a Short Sunderland in game, and the Z501's cfg file is pointing to that model. In other words both of them share the same model, and it seems that devs did so on purpose... now, can you imagine two aircraft diverging more than these two ![]() ![]() ![]() Other than being both flying object capable to land on water, they don't have anything in common... ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Willing Webfooted Beast
|
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Historical TWoS Gameplay Guide: http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?p=2572620 Historical FotRSU Gameplay Guide: https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/sho....php?p=2713394 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Ace of the deep .
|
![]()
As i recall they couldny have the catalina because of copywrite issue and mony wanted for use or something like that .
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | ||
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: CJ8937
Posts: 8,215
Downloads: 793
Uploads: 10
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
![]() Finally I have a proposal for you: what about preparing a complete list of aircraft related SH5 blunders, and releasing a patch for addressing at least the worst of them? We could do it compatible with OHII so to allow Trevally to incorporate the fix in the next version of OHII, if both he and you like the idea. An example about the missing Z501: we could assign to it the AS_USFloatEarlyWar model, unused after the introduction of the correct Catalina model. We could give it the same specs as the historical Z501, but not its aspect of course. Anyway textures can be corrected to resamble a generic italian aircraft, and for love of histrorical correctness we can change its roster name from "Z.501 Patrol Plane" to just "Patrol Plane", or something like that. ![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Willing Webfooted Beast
|
![]()
Wellington and British VLR bomber appear as Sunderland
Bristol beufighter appears as either mosquito or Beaufort Ju87 is the tank busting variant
__________________
Historical TWoS Gameplay Guide: http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?p=2572620 Historical FotRSU Gameplay Guide: https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/sho....php?p=2713394 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: CJ8937
Posts: 8,215
Downloads: 793
Uploads: 10
|
![]()
Yes, I can see it from their cfg files
![]() from what I can see there's a model used for Mosquito MkVI/MkXVIII and another one for Beaufort/Beaufighter ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: In my U-552 and Tiger
Posts: 1,732
Downloads: 788
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
What about british crafts with Leight Light used from June 1942 for SH5 OMII?
![]() http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leigh_light
__________________
U-552 Tiger IDF |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|