Poll about the renown system

Warmonger · 10-22-06, 11:27 AM

Hi everyone.

I changed my cfgs to that way that new boats/improvements don't cost any renown. The reason was that I found it somewhat illogical to have to "pay" my hard earned renown points for something Doenitz would have happily given me to survive and further his efforts. And to top this you could even lose a rank when upgrading or changing subs.

I would instead support and understand a system like "you need x renown to get upgrade y" but when you get it you don't lose any renown, it's merely a prerequisite to have that much renown as the upgrade/sub "costs".

So what do you think about this?

View Poll Results: What do you think about the renown system?
It's fine, leave it as it is (losing renown when upgrading)	21	51.22%
A compromise would be good (renown is required but not lost when upgrading)	15	36.59%
I'm a "I don't wanna pay for anything" commander	5	12.20%
Voters: 41. You may not vote on this poll

10-22-06, 11:27 AM	#1
Warmonger Lieutenant Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Germany Posts: 266 Downloads: 3 Uploads: 0	Poll about the renown system Hi everyone. I changed my cfgs to that way that new boats/improvements don't cost any renown. The reason was that I found it somewhat illogical to have to "pay" my hard earned renown points for something Doenitz would have happily given me to survive and further his efforts. And to top this you could even lose a rank when upgrading or changing subs. I would instead support and understand a system like "you need x renown to get upgrade y" but when you get it you don't lose any renown, it's merely a prerequisite to have that much renown as the upgrade/sub "costs". So what do you think about this?