![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 |
Watch
![]() Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 28
Downloads: 6
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Just a few sugguestions. Could we add an Ageis surface platform into the game, either Arleigh or Ticon, to keep the lonely FFG company?
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Sub Test Pilot
|
![]()
been there many times and done that many times how about some thing else non american or russian
german 212 214 british type 23 who knows
__________________
DONT FORGET if you like a post to nominate it by using the blue diamond ![]() ![]() ![]() Find out about Museum Ships here: https://www.museumships.us/ Flickr for all my pictures: https://www.flickr.com/photos/131313936@N03/ Navy general board articles: https://www.navygeneralboard.com/author/aegis/ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 956
Downloads: 9
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
A quick search on the forums would have provided lots of similar threads, all pretty much with the same result. Yes there is demand for new plattforms (among them the Aegis ships), and no there will be no SCU like utility (SCS has forbidden that) and yes, SCS will think about a release of an expansion if sales for DW go well. At which time I guess they will actually ask around what plattforms the community would love the most to see in DW. Till then I would say this point is mood to discuss.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Captain
![]() Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 518
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Some report place the weapons capacity, vls tubes, speed, and diving depth of the LA and Virginia very similarly.... the main difference between the platforms behind noise level and periscope technology. You could always simulate the Virginia by reducing the noise levels of the LA to that of the SW. Then again.... a Virginia is just a slower SW with less weps capacity... nothing new there.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Navy Dude
![]() Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 176
Downloads: 18
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
That being said, put me in a DDG and terror will have a designation: RUM-139 ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Officer
![]() Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Trieste, Italy
Posts: 236
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
But let the additional platform(s) be russian...we need balance. There's no point in adding western platforms with no opponents...
__________________
The true worth of a man is to be measured by the objects he pursues. - Marcus Aurelius |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,945
Downloads: 220
Uploads: 0
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
Liberty, Equality, Fraternity |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Officer
![]() Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Trieste, Italy
Posts: 236
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
![]() I was playing with the FFG yesterday and realized how good it would be if there was a russian surface platform to control. You could make missions not only restricted to sub hunting...you could make surface based missions, too, which could include land attack or interdiction surface vs surface...and from BOTH sides. I'm talking about cooperative missions here...two or more players on a surface ship playing a single mission. A sub MAY be out there but not necessarily...you could use the probability to inclusion for the sub in the mission editor to give the mission some sort of "thrill"...
__________________
The true worth of a man is to be measured by the objects he pursues. - Marcus Aurelius |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,945
Downloads: 220
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Yep - its like having one hand tied behind you. It limits the potential for achieving balanced gameplay
and flexibility of options in MP mision design. ![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
Liberty, Equality, Fraternity |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Admiral
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,320
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Seaman
![]() Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 32
Downloads: 20
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
What Russian surface ship would be a "balance" to the FFG-7?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Sub Test Pilot
|
![]()
a krivak III would be en par with a perry but the Krivak is acctualy classed as large corvette small frigate.
Udaloy is seen to russians as frigate but in the west as a cruiser same as sovremenny btw its realy messed up the classification
__________________
DONT FORGET if you like a post to nominate it by using the blue diamond ![]() ![]() ![]() Find out about Museum Ships here: https://www.museumships.us/ Flickr for all my pictures: https://www.flickr.com/photos/131313936@N03/ Navy general board articles: https://www.navygeneralboard.com/author/aegis/ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Seaman
![]() Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 32
Downloads: 20
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Kapitain:
Not good enough ASUW warfare with that one. SCS should have modeled a more capable ship besides the FFG-7. Then it would be easier to balance with an introduction of a new Opfor ship. Like Sovremenny or Udaloy. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Sub Test Pilot
|
![]()
udaloy is over 500 feet long bigger and carrys more weapons than a frigate and cannot realy be classified frigate its more destroyer cruiser same with sovremenny but the udaloy is a very good ASW platform.
krivak III and IV is a sort of costal and sea going frigate ASW ASUW and some AAW its multi role. the grisha is a ASW platform but thats a corvette last time i saw an udaloy the 2nd officer remarked she is a bit*h to handle meaning she is a bit too big
__________________
DONT FORGET if you like a post to nominate it by using the blue diamond ![]() ![]() ![]() Find out about Museum Ships here: https://www.museumships.us/ Flickr for all my pictures: https://www.flickr.com/photos/131313936@N03/ Navy general board articles: https://www.navygeneralboard.com/author/aegis/ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|