![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 |
Captain
![]() Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 518
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Anyone got any good information about them? I'm trying to find more information on Conformal Arrays and their supposed capabilities to perhaps model them in-game, but I've had only limited success with my Google searches.
Does any current submarine platform utilize conformal arrays atm? I've heard the Japanese Navy has an SSK that uses conformals. Can anyone confirm? How are the capabilities of a conformal array different than the currently utilized hull and/or spherical arrays? Different washout speeds? Sensitivity? Frequency ranges? :hmm: Any information and/or good sources would be appreciated. ![]() db |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Along the Watchtower
Posts: 3,810
Downloads: 27
Uploads: 5
|
![]()
In DW, the term "conformal" array is to the Russian and Chinese subs what the "hull" array is to the American subs, just as the "cylindrical" array is analagous to the "spherical" array.
Were you thinking that RL conformal arrays have different capabilities than hull arrays, and that adjustments should be made? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Planesman
![]() Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Olympus Mons, Mars
Posts: 184
Downloads: 115
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
the word conformal is a bit of a fuzzy meaning for the type of arrays you refer to. The term is used to describe an array that is flush with the hull of the submarine. it is not a bow array or spherical array. they usually run length-wise down the long axis of the sub. often called flank arrays.
The flank array or conformal array serves two purposes. narrowband identification and ranging. Heres how they work. 1. Identification. Low frequency sound travels further underwater. It also has the highest wavelength, meaning you need a really big array to pick it up. having a long array down the length of your boat does the trick. The towed array is a bit like a flank array, only you tow it behind you. these arrays are thin and long and dont detect broadband noise very well. So, you can use narrowband signals to ID your contacts. Towed arrays are much better at this, but flank arrays dont break and can operate in shallow water unlike towed sets. 2. comparing the data from your flank array to your another array can give you a better TMA and help your solution. so at short range they can act like little triagulators, your bow array gets one bearing and your flank another. you compare and get a rough range estimate. The Seawolf/Virginia Wide Aperature Array is a complete evolution of this. The wide flat arrays, placed along the hull give an almost 3 dimensional sonar picture with each array giving its own data. some of you real sonar guys can correct me here. as for real-life washout speeds and performance I would either have to do some research or defer to an expert. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Captain
![]() Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 518
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I'm thinking of the array that is supposedly going to be incorporated on some of the new SSN 774s
http://www.chinfo.navy.mil/navpalib/...conformal.html Conformal Acoustic Velocity Sonar (CAVES) is another term I've heard. Perhaps I'm interchanging them inappropriately. The things that I've read, mainly SSN 774 briefings, make it sound like conformal arrays will be different that existing arrays, replacing the WAA and making "improvements" in design somehow. Links/clarification would be great. :hmm: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Ocean Warrior
![]() Join Date: May 2005
Location: Free New York
Posts: 3,167
Downloads: 2
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Well, the Navy doesn't want to admit that their Virginia is the "compact car" version of the SeaWolf, so they call it a Littoral Warfare Submarine, which basically translates to "SeaWolf on the Cheap."
That's the cynical way of looking at it. ![]() I'm probably completely wrong, of course. ![]() ![]()
__________________
LW ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Gunner
![]() Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The Mysterious Canadas
Posts: 99
Downloads: 20
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
![]() What I don't get is why they just wouldn't come out and say it, "we learned some lessons on the Seawolf, so now we've got a cheaper design that's <cough> just as effective" |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Commander
![]() Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Solar system, mainly on earth
Posts: 476
Downloads: 62
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
You have to admit every other countries would like this kind of "compact car" to become their luxurious mobile home. Refering to the price of the Seawolves, I think this is a very good way to NOT increase anymore the biggest budget deficit of the planet isn't it ? You probably know France have the the same kind of deficit, but USA, as always, make it real bigger :P |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Captain
![]() Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 518
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() ![]() so..... ..... I take this to mean that we don't really know how Conformal Acoustic Velocity Sonar is any different than the current WAA sonar. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Sailor man
![]() Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Sorento, IL
Posts: 48
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
A conformal array and a WAA are pretty much the same. The Virginia class has a WAA array and it works very well (personal experience).
Call the virginia class a compact Seawolf is not to far from the truth I might add. And thats from a sonarmans point of view. Pingjockey |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|