![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 |
Watch
![]() Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Europe
Posts: 28
Downloads: 22
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Just a quick note to announce that Seawolves have finally allowed the scoring of ALL DW platforms in their SSN division. In other words, you join SSN, and you can play any platform you like.
The only real restriction is that you need one sub per side for gameplay like this. So, so long as you have two subs...you can have as many other platforms you wish. Seawolves also have a new website and scoreboard system. Probably worth a look.
__________________
A war at sea... A war with no battles... no monuments... Only Casualties |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
A-ganger
![]() Join Date: May 2005
Location: Loch lomand, Scotland
Posts: 71
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Bump
![]() Was thinking though sir maybe you should start a new post to announce this as i had to read a lot before i relised most of the stuff before your post was wrote months ago :hmm:
__________________
Joseph,Gary Winters jgw28@blueyonder.co.uk ICQ : 259-346-534 http://seawolves.org |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Navy Dude
![]() Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 176
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Just read the class quote (btw: it got pasted multiple times, thats why the quote is so long).
I read this Quote:
![]() Does anyone know if it works with LWAMI 203? Secondly, are the SWs planning on using this great mod? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
A-ganger
![]() Join Date: May 2005
Location: Loch lomand, Scotland
Posts: 71
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
no it doesnt work for DW and we are now testing the LWAMI mod for use in SW.
I have never played SC mp before so i am just guessing about this. I think that maybe the ones using the click tecnic may have not had gamma set right and if they did then maybe they would have seen a contact that they marked with clicking every baring. So maybe it not as bad as it sounds ![]()
__________________
Joseph,Gary Winters jgw28@blueyonder.co.uk ICQ : 259-346-534 http://seawolves.org |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Navy Dude
![]() Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 176
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
It doesnt work in DW? Thats relieving.
Going to delete my patch suggestion then ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Along the Watchtower
Posts: 3,810
Downloads: 27
Uploads: 5
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Ocean Warrior
![]() Join Date: May 2005
Location: Free New York
Posts: 3,167
Downloads: 2
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
It actually resolves the issue to some degree, because you can assign a NB tracker to the target much sooner than otherwise. That's the Obi Wan answer, btw... from a certain point of view. ![]() ![]()
__________________
LW ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Navy Dude
![]() Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 176
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Now that totally makes sense. Had probs not being able to assign a tracker to a faint signal in SA, and in the first place I thought its an issue with LWAMI and I keep bugging LuftWolf
![]() But I remember the prob in stock DW as well, just not so regulary. Now since the SA got more sensible with LWAMI it makes sense that I more often have a signal I cant assign a tracker to. Thats also the reason why stuff sometiems shows up on SA before on TA. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|