![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 |
Samurai Navy
![]() Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 567
Downloads: 210
Uploads: 1
|
![]()
I realize you won't see much with the scope head below the surface but there's no reason it would break from being too deep. In fact, more than one American sub actually got close enough to photograph submerged Soviet subs with the periscope.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Ocean Warrior
![]() Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Between test depth and periscope depth
Posts: 3,021
Downloads: 175
Uploads: 16
|
![]()
It is routine to have the periscope raised before ascending to PD to look for hulls in the water that may not have show up on sonar, like sailboats. So I second this.
__________________
USS Kentucky SSBN 737 (G) Comms Div 2003-2006 Qualified 19 November 03 Yes I was really on a submarine. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Sailor man
![]() Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 45
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Surely they would raise the scope prior to reaching the right depth to ensure that they exposed only the minimum of mast?
At what depth can the scope be used safely? I assumed the thing was proofed for the same submerged depth as the sub itself, or it is held inside a part of the sail which is pressure proofed externally? Or for that matter what about the crew compartment on top of the sail you see them stood when surfaced? Does this close up or is it too sealed by doors etc? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Seasoned Skipper
![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: The Icy North
Posts: 693
Downloads: 189
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
It's for technical reasons.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Samurai Navy
![]() Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 567
Downloads: 210
Uploads: 1
|
![]()
Fair enough. Something that applies to all masts, I assume?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Watch
![]() Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 15
Downloads: 108
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Does the technical reason also cause the odd transition to above water/under water view? The engine can't display both at the same time, maybe? Not complaining...the techie in me is just curious.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Commander
![]() Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 462
Downloads: 62
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Bummer to hear it can't be done because of technical reasons but I always liked looking through the scope in the Silent Hunter series and Dangerous Waters when about to surface and submerging.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Seasoned Skipper
![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: The Icy North
Posts: 693
Downloads: 189
Uploads: 0
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Ocean Warrior
![]() Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Between test depth and periscope depth
Posts: 3,021
Downloads: 175
Uploads: 16
|
![]() Quote:
The bridge and lookout stations in the sail do have hatches, but that's for streamlining. The sail itself is a free flood area and so is exposed to sea pressure constantly.
__________________
USS Kentucky SSBN 737 (G) Comms Div 2003-2006 Qualified 19 November 03 Yes I was really on a submarine. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
A-ganger
![]() Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 72
Downloads: 26
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
What about breaking it at speed?
I can see the radar mast bending pretty easily, the scope looks fairly solid. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Ocean Warrior
![]() Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Between test depth and periscope depth
Posts: 3,021
Downloads: 175
Uploads: 16
|
![]()
Haven't tested this myself, but there is a speed limit for the masts with and without the fairings raised. Also, Julhelm if you're still lurking this thread: the radar masts are very high. Any particular reason for this? Your resources are what I would consider excellent so puzzled at this.
__________________
USS Kentucky SSBN 737 (G) Comms Div 2003-2006 Qualified 19 November 03 Yes I was really on a submarine. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Seasoned Skipper
![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: The Icy North
Posts: 693
Downloads: 189
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I assumed they would raise to the same height as the periscopes. Also the 50ft depth is hardcoded which gave me problems with certain boats like the Permit.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Ocean Warrior
![]() Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Between test depth and periscope depth
Posts: 3,021
Downloads: 175
Uploads: 16
|
![]()
Typically radar on submarines is/was used for contact management during inbound/outbound transit. Therefore raised height wasn't very high as it didn't need to be. I understand your constraints regarding periscope depth though, particularly with the Permit as she had a much smaller sail.
__________________
USS Kentucky SSBN 737 (G) Comms Div 2003-2006 Qualified 19 November 03 Yes I was really on a submarine. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
A-ganger
![]() Join Date: May 2009
Location: Hooper, UT
Posts: 80
Downloads: 89
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I'm gonna second ETR3's descriptions - he's about as accurate as he's allowed to be, assuming his name is his actual Rate (STS1/SS myself, for the record). My guess is that they aren't using "keel depth" for their references, since when surfaced the depths are showing single digits. Makes me think they might be using center-line depth, which is just flat silly.
What strikes me as really odd is that the depths involved in PD aren't exactly hard to come by - just watch a few older submarine specials and they show the whole process. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Samurai Navy
![]() Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 567
Downloads: 210
Uploads: 1
|
![]()
Huh, I just assumed it was depth below keel...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|