IXC vx IXC/40

Gunnarr · 07-21-15, 05:39 AM

It is stated that the IXC/40 was slightly faster than the IXC, but in stats, it is actually slower. Why is this?

Also, it seems IXC is faster than it should be. but the numbers are very small

I am just wondering, what is the point of using an IXC/40 over an IXC?

Admiral Halsey · 07-21-15, 11:49 AM

Range I believe. IIRC the IXC/40 has a longer range though neither has anything on the IXD2.

rowi58 · 07-21-15, 12:12 PM

Hi,

in SilentHunterIII there is absoluty no difference between a IXC and a IXC/40. We only have one sub model (dat, sim, zon, val, cfg files). You can spend "money" in SH3 to get a IXC/40, but it doesen't make any sence. In RL there was a very little difference, but SH3 is unable to simulate this.

Greetings
rowi58

jorgegonzalito · 07-21-15, 04:08 PM

I prefer the type IXC missions because it is technically superior to the type VIIC, with more surface speed, more number of torpedoes, and two stern tubes instead of one, which ensure a collapse.

Lokisaga · 07-24-15, 05:27 PM

Hello,
In SH3 with GWX 3.0 the differences between the IXC and the IXC/40 in terms of functionality are miniscule. In reality, the newer IXC/40's usually got the newest and best hydrophone, sonar, radar, and RWR equipment installed in the shipyard while the IXC's had to make do with older equipment.

07-21-15, 05:39 AM	#1
Gunnarr Helmsman Join Date: Apr 2015 Posts: 106 Downloads: 23 Uploads: 0	IXC vx IXC/40 It is stated that the IXC/40 was slightly faster than the IXC, but in stats, it is actually slower. Why is this? Also, it seems IXC is faster than it should be. but the numbers are very small I am just wondering, what is the point of using an IXC/40 over an IXC?

07-21-15, 12:12 PM	#3
rowi58 Eternal Patrol Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Karlsruhe Posts: 679 Downloads: 56 Uploads: 0	Hi, in SilentHunterIII there is absoluty no difference between a IXC and a IXC/40. We only have one sub model (dat, sim, zon, val, cfg files). You can spend "money" in SH3 to get a IXC/40, but it doesen't make any sence. In RL there was a very little difference, but SH3 is unable to simulate this. Greetings rowi58 __________________

07-21-15, 11:49 AM	#2
Admiral Halsey Best Admiral in the USN Join Date: Apr 2013 Location: USS Enterprise (CV-6) Posts: 1,740 Downloads: 317 Uploads: 0	Range I believe. IIRC the IXC/40 has a longer range though neither has anything on the IXD2.

07-21-15, 04:08 PM	#4
jorgegonzalito Officer Join Date: Jul 2015 Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina. Posts: 237 Downloads: 322 Uploads: 0	I prefer the type IXC missions because it is technically superior to the type VIIC, with more surface speed, more number of torpedoes, and two stern tubes instead of one, which ensure a collapse.

07-24-15, 05:27 PM	#5
Lokisaga Seaman Join Date: Apr 2013 Posts: 39 Downloads: 23 Uploads: 0	Hello, In SH3 with GWX 3.0 the differences between the IXC and the IXC/40 in terms of functionality are miniscule. In reality, the newer IXC/40's usually got the newest and best hydrophone, sonar, radar, and RWR equipment installed in the shipyard while the IXC's had to make do with older equipment.