![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 |
Seasoned Skipper
![]() Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 676
Downloads: 17
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Here is a question concerning som real history - I think:
__________________
www.fredleander.com - look in to see my new book on Operation Sea Lion "Saving MacArthur" - a book series on how The Philippines were saved |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Eternal Patrol
![]() |
![]()
"Homing gear based oon the comparison of sound intensity was also developed for the electric Type 92 torpedo, but here again it is not known if there were any successes. It appears that the Type 92 torpedo was itself too noisy."
-John Campbell, Naval Weapons of World War Two It sounds like they were put into service.
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.” —Rocky Russo |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,288
Downloads: 85
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Even if the Yahagi shipped such a torpedo, the chance to use it in a classic surface action in 1945 was becoming vanishingly small. I wonder if it wouldn't be a bit of liability as well. A submarine could rely on it's quiet electric motors and it's ability to dive to evade it's own torpedo if it didn't lock on a target. But in a confused surface action with "friendlies" around such a weapon on the loose could be as dangerous to one's own squadron as it is to the enemy. I'm assuming these torpedoes were developed for surface work, not ASW.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,975
Downloads: 153
Uploads: 11
|
![]() I always skeptical about these advanced, super-weapons. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,288
Downloads: 85
Uploads: 0
|
![]() I've become skeptical of postwar autobiographies myself. Be it Churchill or some lowly lieutenant. A good example being that of Mitsuo Fuchida, who led the air attack on Pearl harbor. As more Japanese source works were translated to English, the veracity of Fuchida's statement, quoted in At Dawn We Slept, of having demanded a third-wave Attack on Pearl Harbor's fuel tanks, and his later account of the timing of the American counter-attack in the Battle of Midway have been hotly disputed by historians Jonathan Parshall and Anthony Tully in their book, Shattered Sword. His claim of being at the surrender ceremony on the deck of the Missouri has been determined to be completely false. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,975
Downloads: 153
Uploads: 11
|
![]() Quote:
Uggg, another one! (I'm told IRON COFFINS almost qualifies as fiction.) I have that book, Samurai. This is very disappointing. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Fleet Admiral
|
![]()
I wonder if they picked up the plans from the Germans, but never had time (ability) to develop them?
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Fleet Admiral
|
![]()
I'll just add, I own the Japanese Destroyer Captain book (need to finish
![]() http://www.amazon.com/I-Boat-Captain...i+boat+captain It's a great book, but the thing that struck me the most was just how delusional these guys were. The title says it all; " How Japan's Submarines Almost Defeated the U.S. Navy in the Pacific." wait for it.... ![]() ![]() ![]() That statement couldn't be further from the truth. It is a good read though.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,288
Downloads: 85
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,975
Downloads: 153
Uploads: 11
|
![]() Yeah, Paperback books often have those silly, wildly exaggerated stuff on the cover to get attention. Like newspaper headlines. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|