Does Male Organ Size Impact The Economy?

the_tyrant · 07-29-11, 06:36 AM

Could the answer to our economic problems be in every man's pants?

One researcher, Tatu Westling from the University of Helsinki, took a long, hard look at this issue.

In his research paper comparing average penile length (erect) and GDP growth, Westling introduces the "male organ hypothesis", which states that "penises carry economic significance".

In the abstract he writes, "The size of the male organ is found to have an inverse U-shaped relationship with the level of GDP in 1985. It can alone explain over 15% of the variation in GDP. The GDP maximizing size is around 13.5 centimetres [5.31 inches], and a collapse in economic development is identified as the size of male organ exceeds 16 centimetres [6.30 inches]."

link:http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0..._n_903793.html

Dowly · 07-29-11, 06:59 AM

Right

TarJak · 07-29-11, 08:14 AM

Sounds like he's got his hand on it. Either that or it's a lod of balls.

AVGWarhawk · 07-29-11, 08:18 AM

Quote:

took a long, hard look at this issue.

frau kaleun · 07-29-11, 08:29 AM

Eh. I doubt these findings will stand up in the long run.

TarJak · 07-29-11, 09:00 AM

I wonder if the researcher made a visit to Iceland?

http://www.smh.com.au/travel/members...726-1hy2s.html

07-29-11, 06:36 AM	#1
the_tyrant Admiral Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Canada Posts: 2,272 Downloads: 58 Uploads: 0	Does Male Organ Size Impact The Economy? Could the answer to our economic problems be in every man's pants? One researcher, Tatu Westling from the University of Helsinki, took a long, hard look at this issue. In his research paper comparing average penile length (erect) and GDP growth, Westling introduces the "male organ hypothesis", which states that "penises carry economic significance". In the abstract he writes, "The size of the male organ is found to have an inverse U-shaped relationship with the level of GDP in 1985. It can alone explain over 15% of the variation in GDP. The GDP maximizing size is around 13.5 centimetres [5.31 inches], and a collapse in economic development is identified as the size of male organ exceeds 16 centimetres [6.30 inches]." link:http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0..._n_903793.html __________________ My own open source project on Sourceforge OTP.net KGB grade encryption for the rest of us

07-29-11, 06:59 AM	#2
Dowly Lucky Jack Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Finland Posts: 25,053 Downloads: 32 Uploads: 0	Right

07-29-11, 08:14 AM	#3
TarJak Fleet Admiral Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 17,052 Downloads: 150 Uploads: 8	Sounds like he's got his hand on it. Either that or it's a lod of balls.

07-29-11, 08:29 AM	#5
frau kaleun Rear Admiral Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Skyri--oh who are we kidding, I'm probably at Lowe's. Again. Posts: 12,706 Downloads: 168 Uploads: 0	Eh. I doubt these findings will stand up in the long run.

07-29-11, 09:00 AM	#6
TarJak Fleet Admiral Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 17,052 Downloads: 150 Uploads: 8	I wonder if the researcher made a visit to Iceland? http://www.smh.com.au/travel/members...726-1hy2s.html