![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 |
Soundman
![]() Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 149
Downloads: 195
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I'm finding lots of contradictory information about this. What types of detonators were available for different torpedoes at different times.
For example, this is what I have been able to find: G7a T1: Impact and magnetic (both reliable) G7e T2: Impact and magnetic (magnetic very unreliable, after Norway impact only shots ordered. Impact also somewhat unreliable) G7e T3: Impact and magnetic (both reliable, all torpedos after this feature reliable detonators) Is this information accurate. One source said that the G7a only had contact detonators. If they also had magnetic, were they of the same type as the T2 (i.e. very unreliable?) Was the G7a's contact detonator also unreliable, or did it and the T2 use different versions? Last, does GWX or any other mod accurately simulate the failure rates- I ask because I'm playing in late 1939 and early 1940 at the moment and have noticed no duds or prematures or other failures. thanks |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Chief of the Boat
|
![]()
Enable realistic torpedoes in the options menu.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: In the conning tower of my VIIC scanning the sea through the periscope
Posts: 1,698
Downloads: 173
Uploads: 7
|
![]()
The war diary Dönitz kept during the war is published on the internet at the address: http://www.uboatarchive.net/BDUKTB.htm
The introductory text to the diary says that "A selection of the wide range of topics mentioned in the KTB includes: torpedo failures and developments (PG's 30248, 30250-30251, 30256, 30262, 30264, 30304b, 30323, 30332, 30339, 30350)" I think you could read those diaries and get a reliable picture of the torpedo failures. Different books seem to have contradictory opinions, so the diary is probably the best way to get a more objective view on this. If you have torpedo failures on, you should get duds in GWX. Are you always shooting close to an AOB of 90 degrees and gyro angle close to 0? If so, there would be a lot less failures. Historically speaking the torpedoes should have worked ok, even if shot from a bad angle or AOB - but they didn't. And if I shoot a torpedo from less than perfect solution, I do get torpedo failures. Not as frequently as the U-boats really had, but often enough to make me wanna punch those responsible ![]()
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] NYGM+H.sie v16+Stiebler 4C+MaGui WS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Soundman
![]() Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 149
Downloads: 195
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I am using the realistic torpedo option- but I don't think I've shot from over 1000 meters or had an impact angle less than 75 degrees, so maybe it's me not letting me have duds.
In 30256, Doenitz claims that 40% of missed shots can be accounted for due to torpedo failure- and I have had several instances when I was sure my firing data was correct and only saw one hit, so it seems as if that is behaving realistically. I play with external and event camera off, so it's a bit hard to verify if a torpedo has failed to explode or simply missed. However, out of 20 torpedoes I have fired in this career, around a third of them have been with magnetic fuses, and none have detonated prematurely, which I understand was the main problem with the early war magnetic fuse. Any word on weather or not the G7a was equipped with a magnetic fuse, and was that fuse was more reliable than the one on the TII? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: In the conning tower of my VIIC scanning the sea through the periscope
Posts: 1,698
Downloads: 173
Uploads: 7
|
![]() Quote:
I have had premature detonations but only seldom. That problem is worse, if I shoot torpedoes in heavy seas and if I use a G7a with a speed setting of 44 knots. I haven't used a speed of 44 knots in a long time now, though, because I understand that, that speed setting was actually not used with submarine launched torpedoes. Gordon Williamson's book The Story of the U-boat in World War II claims that G7a's were equipped with an impact detonator but the book also claims that G7a's range was 6000 meters, so I don't think it's very reliable. From what I remember reading elsewhere and from BdU's KTB I think it's very probable that G7a's were actually using the same detonator as G7e. But that's only a hunch.
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] NYGM+H.sie v16+Stiebler 4C+MaGui WS |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Seasoned Skipper
![]() Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Westun New Yahk
Posts: 748
Downloads: 131
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Consider yourself lucky. I had 4 perfect impact shots set up on a VERY large, slow moving target. All clanged off the side, no more than 5* off 90*.
__________________
Largest target sunk with deck gun: Japanese auxiliary cruiser, 15000 tons
Largest engaged: HMS Nelson. Results inconclusive. ![]() Read Brag's stuff ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
![]()
TI G7A & TII G7E used the same pistols.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Chief of the Boat
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Commodore
![]() Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 614
Downloads: 135
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
__________________
Himmel, sukeltakaa! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | ||
Eternal Patrol
![]() |
![]()
That link (I was familiar with the site but not that particular document) had an interesting point:
Quote:
http://eaglescholar.georgiasouthern...._201005_MA.pdf Here is the information I've been looking for for years. The whole file is worth downloading and reading in depth, but here is the relevant information. Quote:
Things I've learned from this single document: 1. The date of the order to stop using MZ (magnetic) pistols, and the beginning of the "Happy Times" - June 1, 1940 (page 132). 2. The date of the introduction of the new improved MZ pistol - November 1942 (Mediterranean) and December 1942 (Atlantic). (page 155) 3. Apparently I've been wrong and SH3 had it right, at least starting in 1943. From that point on there was indeed a selector switch. (Obltn Strand's link, as quoted above). This is the biggest find in a long time, to my mind anyway. ![]()
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.” —Rocky Russo |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Krusty Krab
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Decks awash in the North Atlantic
Posts: 1,450
Downloads: 493
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Nice find SS
![]()
__________________
Good judgment comes from experience. Unfortunately, the experience usually comes from bad judgment. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
![]()
Thamks, Steve.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Chief of the Boat
|
![]()
Good catch mate
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: In the conning tower of my VIIC scanning the sea through the periscope
Posts: 1,698
Downloads: 173
Uploads: 7
|
![]()
Absolutely marvelous!!!
![]() Thanks, Strand for the major find there and Steve for the follow-up job ![]() I am your humble slave and devotee as of this day ![]() Helvetin hyvä löytö Strand!!!
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] NYGM+H.sie v16+Stiebler 4C+MaGui WS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|