![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
![]()
What, if any, advantages does a LUT torpedo hold over a FAT torpedo?
The 1944 torpedo loadout order states that Type VIIC & IXC "LUT boats" would carry a majority of LUT torpedoes, while Type VIIC & IXC "non LUT boats" would be loaded with a majority of FAT torpedoes. Can anybody shed some light on what factors qualify a boat as a "LUT boat" or "Non LUT boat"? |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Chief of the Boat
|
![]()
FAT Federapparat or Flächenabsuchender Torpedo (spring device or area searching torpedo), a mechanical device changes the torpedo's course over time so that it runs up- and down on parallel lines of 800 or 1600 m length
LUT Lageunabhängiger Torpedo (bearing independent torpedo), changes the torpedo's course to a preset heading directly after launch, so the launching platform (only submarines) can fire such torpedoes at targets without changing its own course. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...oes_of_Germany http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WTGER_WWII.htm http://www.uboataces.com/weapon-torpedo.shtml http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G7e_torpedo |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Curitiba, Brazil
Posts: 938
Downloads: 65
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Doesn't that basically describes every single torpedo able of being directed by a gyroangle input?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Mate
![]() Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 54
Downloads: 33
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
The GWX manual (pages 97 and 99) give descriptions and diagrams for how the LUT and FaT work.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Soundman
![]() Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: London
Posts: 143
Downloads: 31
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
The LUT is basically a more sophisticated version of the FAT which can be programmed with a second gyro angle which initiates after it completes its straight run and just before it starts its ladder pattern.
This is best explained with a diagram, if you follow this link and scroll to the middle of the document (the section concerning torpedos) you'll see the difference between FATs and LUTs explained in detail with pictures. http://www.uboatarchive.net/KTBNotes...iveEdition.htm It's from an allied wartime intelligence report so some of the information in the document is speculative (distinctions are made in the text between what is believed to be fact and speculation, makes for interesting reading), although the description of FATs and LUTs is pretty much bang on as far as I know. edit: And yeah like derrinurban said... it's in the GWX manual too......... Last edited by King_Zog; 05-18-11 at 02:38 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
![]() Quote:
This was just the information I was seeking. Bookmarked it too. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: In the conning tower of my VIIC scanning the sea through the periscope
Posts: 1,698
Downloads: 173
Uploads: 7
|
![]() Quote:
http://www.amazon.de/Torpedos-deutsc.../dp/3813208427 Maybe this book could help. It is in German though (it's only 9,95 euroes, I'm thinking about buying it myself, though my skills in German are pretty meager). My guess is that there was not enough LUT torpedoes for every boat and that they gave LUT torpedoes to boats that they wanted to have extra maneuverability in their attack approaches.
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] NYGM+H.sie v16+Stiebler 4C+MaGui WS |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
![]() Quote:
(The german language doesn't work for me either.) I'm wondering if perhaps captain & key crew members would have to be specialy qualified in the complexities of the LUT torpedo. There seems to be much to learn. I'm somewhat torn between being anxiouse to try them, and fearful of not understanding how to properly use them. 1944 is not a forgiving time for experimenting. Therefor, should my boat survive for another patrol, I think I'll stick with the simpler FATs. Even they seem to consume much ekstra time. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Mate
![]() Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: England
Posts: 54
Downloads: 2
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
My understanding—although I don't know it to be 100% fact—is that the additional information required for programmable torpedoes required modifications to the TDC. It may be that 'LUT boats' or 'FAT boats' were boats that had had this modification.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: In the conning tower of my VIIC scanning the sea through the periscope
Posts: 1,698
Downloads: 173
Uploads: 7
|
![]()
This sounds likely. The TDC must have been changed and that might have taken some time.
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] NYGM+H.sie v16+Stiebler 4C+MaGui WS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
![]()
The book Type VII U-Boats by Robert Stern states that physical changes were required to both the attack computer and torpedo tube to accommodate FaT's. Further modifications were needed to use LuT's and by July 1944 some fifty boats had been refitted for them. The implication seems to be that the modifications were exclusive and a LuT boat could not necessarily launch FaT's or vice versa.
SH3 allows you to use both types interchangably and I have had good success using them against convoys late in the war and avoiding counter-attacks. |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
![]() Quote:
Thank you for the info, which is quite useful. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|