![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 |
The Old Man
![]() Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sin City
Posts: 1,364
Downloads: 55
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Ive been thinking lately. I dont know exactly what im talking about, but it makes sense to me somewhat.
Wouldnt a higher shot, say as close to the waterline as possible, flood the ship better then a keel/ lower shot. Think about it. A shot made at the waterline makes a hole that half extends to the part of the ship thats above water and half underwater. (roughly) That hole starts flooding that deck immediately. But this where i think i could be right or wrong. Wouldnt the deck you hit start spilling water into all the lower decks as well? say you have ship with A-G Decks. Your waterline shot hits say D deck. wouldnt the water spill into E F and G decks at least? As opposed to a low shot made at F deck which would spill into G deck filling the boat with less water therefore making it less likely to sink. The weight from D E F and G decks would easily make the ship's density over 1 and cause it to sink right? But this is just a slightly undereducated thought. But where i dont know too much is if each deck was in itself a watertight compartment. As in if D deck floods it has no way of reaching other decks. BUT wouldnt that sort of....cut off people from reaching E f and G decks? So im actually somewhat asking a question. were at least MERCHANTS equipped with independent water tight decks. And if im right, how come making a waterline shot in SH5 actually worse then shooting for the keel?
__________________
![]() A popular Government without popular information nor the means of acquiring it, is but a Prologue to a Farce or a Tragedy or perhaps both. Knowledge will forever govern ignorance, and a people who mean to be their own Governors must arm themselves with the power knowledge gives - James Madison |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|