Blocking Gmail, yahoo and hotmail is just dumb

[seiseki]

Luckily I could use http://meltmail.com/ to forward the email to my gmail.
But blocking the most common mail providers seems like a rather unorthodox and dumb way to prevent spam.

Especially since spammers can just do what I did, but most regular users won't have the knowledge, it's like the DRM equivalent for forums.

[Dowly]

You didn't use the thread 5 down from this because...?

[frau kaleun]

Originally Posted by Dowly

You didn't use the thread 5 down from this because...?

Theirs is not to reason why, theirs is but to troll and die.

[raymond6751]

I'm not into spam, nor trollers, but

I do use gmail, so I have to agree.

[mookiemookie]

Go away, Honesty/Destiny/whatever. You're a troll.

[Takeda Shingen]

I also use gmail. However, given the past few days, I think it is very clear why certain email servers are blocked. The simple fact is that when they are blocked, we see four or five 'bots per month. When they are not, we see four or five per day. The method is effective and efficient; nothing dumb or unorthodox about it.

'Nuff said.

[Jimbuna]

Originally Posted by Takeda Shingen

I also use gmail. However, given the past few days, I think it is very clear why certain email servers are blocked. The simple fact is that when they are blocked, we see four or five 'bots per month. When they are not, we see four or five per day. The method is effective and efficient; nothing dumb or unorthodox about it.

'Nuff said.

Agreed...and thit is coming from someone with a few Hotmail accounts.

[frau kaleun]

Originally Posted by raymond6751

I'm not into spam, nor trollers, but

I do use gmail, so I have to agree.

It's unfortunate, but as noted in the thread already started on this topic, every time those email providers are temporarily unblocked the forums get inundated with spambots.

They do not, to my knowledge, get inundated with legitimate new members using yahoo/hotmail/gmail email addies. So for Subsim overall, there does seem to be more value in blocking them than allowing them.

[seiseki]

Originally Posted by frau kaleun

It's unfortunate, but as noted in the thread already started on this topic, every time those email providers are temporarily unblocked the forums get inundated with spambots.

They do not, to my knowledge, get inundated with legitimate new members using yahoo/hotmail/gmail email addies. So for Subsim overall, there does seem to be more value in blocking them than allowing them.

Surely there must be other ways to stop spam other than blocking email providers, captcha is working for other forums, why not this forum?

This is just going to piss of a lot of legit users.

[Takeda Shingen]

Anyone remember the firestorm when we tried to institute a catchpa?

Again, we have been using the current method for years. It works well. It will continue to work well. If you are legit, you can use one of the other services. Consider it the Destiny of Honesty. Take Solace in that.

[Dowly]

Originally Posted by Takeda Shingen

Anyone remember the firestorm when we tried to institute a catchpa?

Subsim uses captcha on registration.

[Takeda Shingen]

Originally Posted by Dowly

Subsim uses captcha on registration.

Ah. Didn't know that. I never had to use one, but that was a decade ago. Well, I suppose that this renders the argument moot.

[Dowly]

Originally Posted by Takeda Shingen

Ah. Didn't know that. I never had to use one, but that was a decade ago. Well, I suppose that this renders the argument moot.

There's also a no-spam verification question thingy.

[Takeda Shingen]

Well, there ya go. Catchpas and questionaires are ineffective, as the spammers have found ways to circumvent them. And so Downley delivers the coup de grace to the complaint.

[Dowly]