![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 |
Fleet Admiral
|
![]()
http://www.fabtech.org/news/_a/yield...obalfoundries/
Whoa, that makes these guys 2 years behind in this technology. ![]()
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Land of windmills, tulips, wooden shoes and cheese. Lots of cheese.
Posts: 8,467
Downloads: 53
Uploads: 10
|
![]()
How so? Intel only rolled out the first 32nm CPU at the start of this year.
![]()
__________________
Contritium praecedit superbia. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Fleet Admiral
|
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Estland
Posts: 4,330
Downloads: 3
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Even with old technology AMD provides a better product at a better price point at this moment.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Lucky Jack
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Admiral
![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Suomi, sauna, puukko, perkele
Posts: 2,346
Downloads: 39
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Goes in cycles I guess. When I last bought a CPU in the end of 2006 AMD was completely **** and Intel's Core 2 Duos ruled the market. Now pretty much all the reviews seem to promote AMD.
edit: Come to think of it I've never had an AMD even though I've sworn "next time I'll get one". Every time I've been on the market for a new CPU or a new laptop Intel has provided the best bang for the buck. Last edited by Fincuan; 07-26-10 at 08:39 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Fleet Admiral
|
![]()
That has always been AMD's strong point; price/ performance ratio. Nothing wrong with them.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Fleet Admiral
|
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Lucky Jack
![]() |
![]()
I have been an AMD fan for many years. Truly one that has a lot of bang for the buck.
__________________
“You're painfully alive in a drugged and dying culture.” ― Richard Yates, Revolutionary Road |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Fleet Admiral
|
![]()
It sounds like they are having manufacturing issues, so I'm curious what the big problem is? It's just freakin' amazing how much stuff they can put on such a small chip
![]() ![]()
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
CINC Pacific Fleet
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Down Under
Posts: 34,688
Downloads: 171
Uploads: 0
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
Sub captains go down with their ship! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Captain
![]() Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 546
Downloads: 17
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I love my AMD ive got my 955 quad core running all the way from 3.2 up to 3.65 with barely touching the voltage. I LOVE it!
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Shreveport, Louisiana
Posts: 1,956
Downloads: 13
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
There is ALOT going into Globalfoundries 32nm process. The reason they are delaying and tweaking is because it is EXTREMELY difficult to "Fix" things during production. TSMC 40nm became a nightmare because of this effect. It is far better to fix things before mass production and focus on new improvements along the life than try to fix things throughout the lifecycle.
Their 32nm process has to compete with Intels 22nm CPUs coming out in late 2011 to early 2012. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Estland
Posts: 4,330
Downloads: 3
Uploads: 0
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|