SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Silent Hunter 3 - 4 - 5 > Silent Hunter 4: Wolves of the Pacific
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-09-10, 01:54 AM   #1
treblesum81
Frogman
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 308
Downloads: 71
Uploads: 0
Default You gotta be kidding me...

So I'm set up for a 90° convoy attack sitting at a depth of 250ft (a full 100ft below the thermal layer), silent running, at a dead stop. In the past (TMO 1.9) this tactic allowed me to slip under the destroyer screen undetected, after which time I would either pop up to periscope depth or to about 80ft for a sonar attack. This time, as soon as the DD's got nearby, they started pinging and then dropping depth charges on my head... With pinpoint accuracy no less!!

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought that active sonar doesn't penetrate the thermal layer, so even if they were pinging, they could not get an accurate fix on your position? I could maybe understand the fact that they picked me up at all, but to be able to literally drop depth charges on my deck when their sonar shouldn't even be able to hit me seems more than a little incorrect...

EDIT: This is with TMO 2

EDIT 2: I know the passive sensors were tweaked, but would this affect the active sonar as well?

Last edited by treblesum81; 06-09-10 at 02:21 AM.
treblesum81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-10, 04:10 AM   #2
treblesum81
Frogman
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 308
Downloads: 71
Uploads: 0
Default

On a side note, I've tried this a few more times at different depths and ranges and found something interesting...

As long as you are within a certain range of the escorts (1000y-2000y) they will detect you instantly as soon as any part of your sub even gets near the thermal layer. I succeeded in slipping past the escort ring of the convoy at a depth of 300ft, but then the instant I got to about 200ft-225ft on the way back up the pinging started again. I tried again, waiting longer this time so that I was well behind the front escorts and far in front of the side / rear escorts and the same thing happened... as soon as I got near ~200ft, the pinging started again.

This is a behavior I don't remember getting prior to TMO 2, but I can't 100% disqualify because there are so many variable conditions. I know that TMO enhances the sensors of the AI, but the changelog for this one seems to indicate that they were reduced so all the more confusing...

PS: I didn't mention it before, but this is all happening in mid-december '41.
treblesum81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-10, 02:24 PM   #3
Red Devil
The Old Man
 
Red Devil's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sutton Coldfield England
Posts: 1,540
Downloads: 305
Uploads: 0
Default

Asdic could not operate in bad weather or penetrate thermal layers in reality. It does, however, depend on the amount of noise you could be making, were you on silent running? Loading torps is bad for your health, its really quite a noisy process involving chains.

In bad weather, eg: Atlantic, in WW2, sub hunters like Capt Walker RN, could not use Asdic in heavy swell. (and he was a real expert).
__________________
>
>
Captain!, there's a destroyer on the por........ periscope is flooded Sir!
>
Darkness is only the absence of Light; Ignorance is only the absence of knowledge ©

www.worldwartwo.uk
www.captainwalker.uk
Red Devil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-10, 02:51 PM   #4
Bubblehead1980
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Florida USA
Posts: 7,104
Downloads: 605
Uploads: 44


Default

Ducimus reduced the effectiveness of thermal layers in TMO 2.0 said so in change log.
Bubblehead1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-10, 03:37 PM   #5
Ducimus
Rear Admiral
 
Ducimus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 12,987
Downloads: 67
Uploads: 2


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubblehead1980 View Post
Ducimus reduced the effectiveness of thermal layers in TMO 2.0 said so in change log.
Passive only. Though i also reduced how sensitive passive is as well.

I did this because i thought the AI's hydrophones were too sensitive above the layer. Which was a side of tweaking their sensitivy up to such a rate as so you can be heard within reason below the layer. By lowering the thermal layer effect on hydrophones, it allowed me to reduce the hydrophone sensitivty so their not super sensitve above the layer, and not completely deaf when your below it.

edit:
BTW, your speed, wind speed, range to destroyer, silent running, and below layer or not all play a part.

In sum, always have silent running on when you can, and the calmer the weather, the slower you go. Rough seas you can open the throttle up a bit.
Ducimus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-10, 06:39 PM   #6
treblesum81
Frogman
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 308
Downloads: 71
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ducimus View Post
Passive only. Though i also reduced how sensitive passive is as well.

I did this because i thought the AI's hydrophones were too sensitive above the layer. Which was a side of tweaking their sensitivy up to such a rate as so you can be heard within reason below the layer. By lowering the thermal layer effect on hydrophones, it allowed me to reduce the hydrophone sensitivty so their not super sensitve above the layer, and not completely deaf when your below it.

edit:
BTW, your speed, wind speed, range to destroyer, silent running, and below layer or not all play a part.

In sum, always have silent running on when you can, and the calmer the weather, the slower you go. Rough seas you can open the throttle up a bit.
I was at a dead stop, in silent running, about 1000-2000 yards from the destroyer(s), and in light to moderate seas. Basically, I was a hole in the water ascending by air pressure only and as soon as the top of my periscope crossed the thermal layer (verified by raising the scope and ascending which caused detection at a deeper depth) I was immediately detected. It almost seems like the net result of the changes, at least under these conditions, is to create a plane in the water where you become instantly visible if any part of your sub crosses it on the way up. More concerning though is the fact that DD's seem to be able to target me with active sonar well below the thermal layer.. After detection, I went as deep as 300ft on silent running at only 1kt and they were able to consistently place depth charges on my deck or at least within 50ft of my sub. I wonder if the reduced thermal layer effect had improved the passive response to active sonar?
treblesum81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-10, 08:07 PM   #7
Armistead
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: on the Dan
Posts: 10,880
Downloads: 364
Uploads: 0


Default

You can still get by with murder in heavy seas. I haven't noticed any change really, but I stay at scope depth. If they do ping, I'm usually able to get my shot off and get deep enough and evade before they make their run. However, only have 3 patrols in, but overall I like the change, seem to get by with a little more at scope depth.
Armistead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-10, 04:20 AM   #8
treblesum81
Frogman
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 308
Downloads: 71
Uploads: 0
Default

I hate to say it but I'm going to have to go back to 1.9.... I'm getting consistently detected and then pinged and sunk... all while well below the thermal layer. I really wish this wasn't the case, since many of the other changes to this version are very nice, but it seems that if the seas are anything other than rough, the thermal layer no longer has any effect.
treblesum81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-10, 06:30 AM   #9
Red Devil
The Old Man
 
Red Devil's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sutton Coldfield England
Posts: 1,540
Downloads: 305
Uploads: 0
Default

Your lucky treble, I can even download 1.9, all I get is a file that adobe wants to open.
__________________
>
>
Captain!, there's a destroyer on the por........ periscope is flooded Sir!
>
Darkness is only the absence of Light; Ignorance is only the absence of knowledge ©

www.worldwartwo.uk
www.captainwalker.uk
Red Devil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-10, 07:18 AM   #10
orangehat44
A-ganger
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 80
Downloads: 48
Uploads: 0
Default

Did you read duci's read me file about the sonar and detection. I am still a new captian and TMO is teaching me the hard way on how to make the correct decisions. But Starting in the Asiatic fleet at the beginneing of the war and running into the Luzon Landing forces. I was able to aproach the convoy head on, at slient running 1 knt (50 ish RPMS I think) in dead calm seas, by taking my sargo class down to 350. I really think in TMO 2 you have to play russian roullet with the crush depth in order to survive. Granted When I tried to pop up in the middle of the convoy I was detected as it was day and dead calm, But you certanly can go under their sonar cones. I think 2.0 is great so far, I just have to learn to make the correct decisions and use the sub how its suppose to be used. I tend to be too blood thirsty as Im still new to the game and just want the fire works, but learning how to make the right choices and be patient.

@ red devil, the first file on Duci's first post is the pdf, scroll to the bottom for the 2.0 download.
orangehat44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-10, 07:47 AM   #11
Red Devil
The Old Man
 
Red Devil's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sutton Coldfield England
Posts: 1,540
Downloads: 305
Uploads: 0
Default

orange, thanks mate but that was the link I was given. I think I do not want 2.0 after what I have heard, but will look again for 1.9 - my thanks

regarding that link page - this is the only TMO19 download there - the pdf????
__________________
>
>
Captain!, there's a destroyer on the por........ periscope is flooded Sir!
>
Darkness is only the absence of Light; Ignorance is only the absence of knowledge ©

www.worldwartwo.uk
www.captainwalker.uk
Red Devil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-10, 08:48 AM   #12
orangehat44
A-ganger
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 80
Downloads: 48
Uploads: 0
Default

sorry I thought you were talking about 2.0 Im guessing some where on duci's file front page 1.9 still exists but I dunno. Sorry cant be of more help
orangehat44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-10, 09:47 AM   #13
TwistedFemur
Frogman
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 302
Downloads: 72
Uploads: 0
Default

its those super top secret japanese anti sub homing torpedos
__________________
<a href="http://www.dewmocracy.com" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.dewmocracy.com/images/banner_distortion.jpg" border="0" alt="Vote for MTN DEW(R) Distortion(TM) - Dewmocracy.com" /></a>
TwistedFemur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-10, 02:17 PM   #14
treblesum81
Frogman
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 308
Downloads: 71
Uploads: 0
Default

I understand that TMO is supposed to make things more difficult, and I really like the mod (part of the reason I would go back to 1.9 rather than something else), but I really think that the thermal layer effect got reduced too much somehow. I'm really serious when I say that no matter how deep I dive and no matter how silently I'm sitting there, the enemy DD's are able to detect me, PING me, and drop DC's on my decks. Now, again, I don't expect it to be a walk in the park... I don't even expect that they shouldn't be able to detect me at those depths, but they should not be able to accurately ping a submarine 200ft below the thermal layer and put DC's on it as if it was at periscope depth... After all, it was Ducimus himself who described in his "Uber AI Explained" post that the thermal layer will protect a sub against active (and passive) sonar.

Again, I like the mod, I just think this one feature might have gone a little awry. If I'm wrong, I can also accept that, even if it means I won't use this version.

EDIT: Out of curiosity, which file(s) control to the thermal layer characteristics so I can change them myself should I want to?
treblesum81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-10, 03:09 PM   #15
raymond6751
Admirable Mike
 
raymond6751's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,338
Downloads: 421
Uploads: 0
Default Try turning

I have found that escorts have a harder time tracking you if you keep a 5-10 degree turn going on.

They may get close, but since you are constantly turning, they can't pinpoint your track.
__________________
Game Designer:
Close The Atlantic - World War Three
https://boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/...orld-war-three
raymond6751 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.