SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Silent Hunter 3 - 4 - 5 > Silent Hunter 4: Wolves of the Pacific
Forget password? Reset here

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 05-05-10, 11:25 PM   #1
KlassenT
Mate
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 54
Downloads: 21
Uploads: 0
Default Historically-Accurate TDC Usage

I've been playing around of late with all manner of attack families in SH4, and at the end of the day, I have to say that I just don't come away with any feeling of trust in the TDC's "selling points." It's great for data acquisition / input and crunching some numbers for gyro angles on less conventional shots, but when the rubber meets the road I'm infinitely more confident using some sort of geometric approach.

The question, though, how does that stack up with the actual skippers in the earlier days of sub warfare, before we had the serious computing power to handle complex fire-control problems? Certainly the math behind vector analysis and the concept of 3min diagrams are older than even the rustiest of S-boats, so how many skippers ended up putting their trust in their TDC instead of their pencil and notebook? I've never had the privilege of reading most of the WWII-oriented books that come to such high acclaim here on the forums, and I'm certain there are several capabilities of the TDC that never got properly modeled into SH4's gameplay, so what's the skinny on this one, fellas?
KlassenT is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.