RA / DWX 1.0 : What do you think about the damage model ?

goldorak · 09-17-09, 09:27 PM

The title says it all.
Did you find inconsistencies or quirks that destroy gameplay ?
Some test were done in a specific scenario :

A pakistani Daphne SSK hit by MK 50, Stallions and SSN-27.

The results :

The mk 50 with a warhead of 50kg does 100% damage to the Daphne'
The Stallion with a warhead of 70kg does around 90% damage
The SSN-27-ASW with a warhead of 80kg does 100% damage.

What's your opinion ?

The russian subrocs look consistent, the Stallion has a lesser warhead than the SSN-27 and so does less damage. What about the MK50 with a warhead of 50kg ? Can we ascribe the 100% damage to the superior worksmanhip of US torpedos over russian ones ? Or is something amiss and should be corrected ?

09-17-09, 09:27 PM	#1
goldorak Admiral Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 2,320 Downloads: 0 Uploads: 0	RA / DWX 1.0 : What do you think about the damage model ? The title says it all. Did you find inconsistencies or quirks that destroy gameplay ? Some test were done in a specific scenario : A pakistani Daphne SSK hit by MK 50, Stallions and SSN-27. The results : The mk 50 with a warhead of 50kg does 100% damage to the Daphne' The Stallion with a warhead of 70kg does around 90% damage The SSN-27-ASW with a warhead of 80kg does 100% damage. What's your opinion ? The russian subrocs look consistent, the Stallion has a lesser warhead than the SSN-27 and so does less damage. What about the MK50 with a warhead of 50kg ? Can we ascribe the 100% damage to the superior worksmanhip of US torpedos over russian ones ? Or is something amiss and should be corrected ?