SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-19-09, 11:00 PM   #1
baggygreen
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Canberra, ACT, Down Under (really On Top)
Posts: 1,880
Downloads: 7
Uploads: 0
Default Our new sub

http://informationdissemination.blog...own-under.html

Interesting reading.

I've a friend in DMO who obviously can't confirm nor deny anything, however I've heard there are rumblings that the next Aussie boat will not only be of indigenous design but will represent a huge leap forward in our naval capability. VSLM tubes, UUVs, AIP, combined with a similar suite of electronics and sensors to the Virginia class, will be an enormous strategic jump for our nation.

Rumours are also beginning to float around that the US will use the design as a base for their own AIP subs.

Any thoughts? I'm fascinated by it myself, its exciting to see imo.
baggygreen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-09, 11:31 PM   #2
Platapus
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 19,377
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by baggygreen
I've a friend in DMO who obviously can't confirm nor deny anything,
Perhaps we should all follow your friend's lead on this?
__________________
abusus non tollit usum - A right should NOT be withheld from people on the basis that some tend to abuse that right.
Platapus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-09, 11:44 PM   #3
baggygreen
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Canberra, ACT, Down Under (really On Top)
Posts: 1,880
Downloads: 7
Uploads: 0
Default

At the moment it is all speculation and rumour, at the very least until the white paper is released. Then another (projected) 15 years until we'll see a completed vessel, provided everything moves smoothly. The reason I mentioned my mate was that speaking with him reminded me to look into it, not because anything was said
baggygreen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-09, 02:39 AM   #4
TarJak
Fleet Admiral
 
TarJak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,052
Downloads: 150
Uploads: 8


Default

Interesting read. Would be interesting to see what they do if they decide on a local design, in terms of powerplant, strike packages, systems etc.

Hopefully it's not a camel.
TarJak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-09, 05:43 AM   #5
UnderseaLcpl
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Storming the beaches!
Posts: 4,254
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by Platapus
Quote:
Originally Posted by baggygreen
I've a friend in DMO who obviously can't confirm nor deny anything,
Perhaps we should all follow your friend's lead on this?

To hell with that. The Chinese don't pay me just to sit around and shoot the breeze. Let's hear some details.
__________________

I stole this sig from Task Force
UnderseaLcpl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-09, 07:43 AM   #6
Frame57
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: 1300 feet on the crapper
Posts: 1,860
Downloads: 2
Uploads: 0
Default

Greg Combet discussed this with the US Submarine league. The project is called SEA 1000. The design work has to be finished and on paper by 2012. The combat systems are all that will have US consulted input. Probably will be built in Adelaide. The Submarine Institute of Australia can probably give you more details as time goes by. From what I gather the boat will be built upon the Collins class technology already being used as far as the boats over all hull design and propulsion is concerned. I am sure there will be some neat changes though to incorporate some other VLS concerns. They keep talking about having an expanded range submarine but refuse to go with nuclear power???
__________________
"My Religion consists of a humble admiration of the illimitable superior spirit who reveals himself in the slight details we are able to perceive with our frail and feeble minds." Albert Einstein
Frame57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-09, 08:10 AM   #7
baggygreen
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Canberra, ACT, Down Under (really On Top)
Posts: 1,880
Downloads: 7
Uploads: 0
Default

Blame the greenies.

There is such an enormous fear of nuke power here, spread by the uninformed.

Silly.
baggygreen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-09, 08:23 AM   #8
Happy Times
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Finland
Posts: 2,950
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0
Default

Can the sub experts explain why Germany and Sweden where not mentioned in this story in past or present terms?
__________________
Happy Times is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-09, 01:14 AM   #9
bookworm_020
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sinking ships off the Australian coast
Posts: 5,966
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by baggygreen
Blame the greenies.

There is such an enormous fear of nuke power here, spread by the uninformed.

Silly.
Getting enough qualified crew to run a nuc boat would be difficult.

Quote:
I've heard they're going to go nuclear and buy our old Swiftsure class boats
After seeing how the Canadians went with the Diesel subs you guys sold them and the reports on how you treated them, thanks, but no thanks!

IT will be interesting to see how many subs they are talking about and the fact they are VLS equiped will raise some concerns with other navies in the region.
bookworm_020 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.