SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Silent Hunter 3 - 4 - 5 > Silent Hunter III
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-24-09, 07:42 AM   #1
hewsu
Watch
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 19
Downloads: 16
Uploads: 0
Default Norwegian merchant fleet

On my campaign I was sailing near Stavenger (South West of Norway) on May 1940 and sighted a 2000 ton Norwegian Coastal Ship. I intercepted and sank it, but then I started thinking how much did the sinking really benefit germanys war effort.

After some light research on the subject I found out that...

1. At the start of the war germany actually tried to use the Norwegian merchant fleet for its own purposes or atleast keep them away from allied hands.

2. Later the Norwegian ships joined the Allied cause and had a norwegian led organization called Nortraship leading them in the seas.


So just how much did it benefit to sink a Norwegian merchant (that actually even seemed to be heading back to Norway) near the norwegian shore on May 1940? :hmm:
hewsu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-09, 10:48 AM   #2
Jimbuna
Chief of the Boat
 
Jimbuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 250 metres below the surface
Posts: 190,473
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 13


Default

In game terms......none whatsoever seeing as how the game respawns everything after each reboot.

In RL/historically....every vessel sunk was one less that could carry war materials to aid the allies war effort.
__________________
Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.
Oh my God, not again!!

Jimbuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-09, 12:45 PM   #3
hewsu
Watch
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 19
Downloads: 16
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimbuna
In RL/historically....every vessel sunk was one less that could carry war materials to aid the allies war effort.
Unless those merchants could have been used by the Axis :hmm: Not an expert on the Norwegian operation so don't know what orders the submarines had got concerning the sinking of norwegian vessels after the invasion, but the situation might have been tempting not to sink commercial vessels in order to seize them later on for own purposes.
hewsu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-09, 01:06 PM   #4
Kapt Z
Grey Wolf
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: ...somewhere in the swamps of Jersey.
Posts: 909
Downloads: 157
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hewsu
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimbuna
In RL/historically....every vessel sunk was one less that could carry war materials to aid the allies war effort.
Unless those merchants could have been used by the Axis :hmm: Not an expert on the Norwegian operation so don't know what orders the submarines had got concerning the sinking of norwegian vessels after the invasion, but the situation might have been tempting not to sink commercial vessels in order to seize them later on for own purposes.
I would think such a 'strategic' decision made by a U-boat kaleun might not go over too well with the higher ups....

That being said, I don't know the historical view of the Bdu on this matter. Maybe they figured it was more important that the 'allied' cargo ended up on the bottom than the possibility of one more ship added to the 'axis' rolls.
Kapt Z is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.