SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Silent Hunter 3 - 4 - 5 > Silent Hunter 4: Wolves of the Pacific
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-01-08, 02:13 PM   #1
SteamWake
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 13,224
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
Default 6 duds and the end of a carrer

There it was... Huge Liner over 10,000 tons. Escorted by 3 destroyers..

Headed right for us. Manuvered into position easly. Good shot from inside of 1,500 yards. Torpedes set fast, check, set shallow check, solution check, open doors Check.

Fire 1, 2, 3, 4

Down scope, Left full rudder, make your depth 180 feet.... (time passes)

"Torpedo was a dud sir!". Good thing I took four shots , "Dud sir,... Dud sir...

Surely the last one will "Torpedo was a dud sir!"... For cryin out loud! Ahead full right full rudder ready tubes 5 & 6...

Reach Periscope depth, rudder amidships... At this point the freighter had gone into flank and one of the DD's is steaming right for my scope, quick calcs, some guesses and "Fire 5, 6" Down scope, left full rudder, crash dive !

We reached about 120 feet when "Torpedo was a dud sir" and again the 6th was also a dud.

The first salvo of DC's was brutal with two close ones causing flooding engine and other damage not to mention the crew.

Finally passing the thermal we slowed and centered the rudder. Could not afford to call for silent running as the flooding was getting ahead of us.

Ping, ping, Crap he has us boadside... This time they found the depth and ... well... killed. All hands lost....

6 duds in a row

Captin Fred Plunkem and the crew of the Pickrel... Hell of a carrier about 10 tours and more than enough tonnage.
SteamWake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-08, 03:35 PM   #2
C DuDe
Ensign
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 229
Downloads: 17
Uploads: 0
Default

Smells like sabotage to me.. But then again we'll never know now
C DuDe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-08, 05:17 PM   #3
Seminole
Ace of the Deep
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,012
Downloads: 102
Uploads: 0
Default

Thats what you get for playing with invincibility off... ...your mama should have warned you...
__________________
Seminole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-08, 06:37 PM   #4
banjo
Grey Wolf
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 762
Downloads: 55
Uploads: 0
Default

That's perzactly why I never check 'dud torpdeos' in options.
banjo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-08, 10:19 AM   #5
SteamWake
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 13,224
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seminole
Thats what you get for playing with invincibility off... ...your mama should have warned you...
I think that liner had invincibility ON... I mean 6 duds in a row !!! :hmm:

Thats a record for me at least, anyone have more than 6 in a row? Not misses... duds.

LOL on my next 'new' carrier starting in 1943 first two torps out of the box... duds.. here we go again :rotfl:
SteamWake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-08, 12:59 PM   #6
GunnersMate
Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: USS Sea Tiger
Posts: 251
Downloads: 4
Uploads: 0
Default

At this point what you would do is take the torpedo room's LPO stuff in the tube and see if he's a dud too.
__________________
\"Sir they just fired an Exocet at us!\"
\"Very well, Bosn pipe Sweepers\"


I\'m having trouble with the radar, sir.
What\'s wrong with it?
I\'ve lost the bleeps, I\'ve lost the sweeps, and I\'ve lost the creeps.
GunnersMate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-08, 02:03 PM   #7
Arclight
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Land of windmills, tulips, wooden shoes and cheese. Lots of cheese.
Posts: 8,467
Downloads: 53
Uploads: 10
Default

I remember chasing a particularly lucky one: Fired spread of 4, all hits with 1 detonation. She didn't sink, so I fired 2 more as she was maneuvering. Both hit, both dud. Surfaced and engaged with the gun, staying out of range of theirs. 70 shells later, nothing, not a scratch. Fired 4 more torps in a surface attack, all duds. Fired remaining 80 shells, again not any more flooding, but at least I brought her to a dead stop. Submerged to get close, postioned to hit her flank, and this one finally blew. Down she went.

I think the third torp in the first spread was good, so the fourth + 2 duds after that + 4 duds after the gun didn't do anything makes 7 in a row (at least 6 if the fourth in the spread was the good one), total of 9 in that engagement.

NSM + ROW/PE + RFB + RSRD.
__________________

Contritium praecedit superbia.
Arclight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-08, 02:49 PM   #8
SteamWake
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 13,224
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arclight
I remember chasing a particularly lucky one: Fired spread of 4, all hits with 1 detonation. She didn't sink, so I fired 2 more as she was maneuvering. Both hit, both dud. Surfaced and engaged with the gun, staying out of range of theirs. 70 shells later, nothing, not a scratch. Fired 4 more torps in a surface attack, all duds. Fired remaining 80 shells, again not any more flooding, but at least I brought her to a dead stop. Submerged to get close, postioned to hit her flank, and this one finally blew. Down she went.

I think the third torp in the first spread was good, so the fourth + 2 duds after that + 4 duds after the gun didn't do anything makes 7 in a row (at least 6 if the fourth in the spread was the good one), total of 9 in that engagement.

NSM + ROW/PE + RFB + RSRD.
At least it was un-escorted evidently.

If ANY of the first four in the salvo would have detonated we would have continued evasion and be 'alive' today.

It was the frustration, and frankly the stupidity of the captain (me) comming back to fire the last two fish in the bow tubes. Yes the second attempt is what got them destroyed.
SteamWake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-08, 03:00 PM   #9
Orion2012
Commodore
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 611
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Isn't the chance of a dud reduced by 50% when firing with the slow setting??

I mean it would make sense to mdel that, especially giving the nature of what caused the duds. (The pin being crushed from the force)
Orion2012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-08, 03:24 PM   #10
Arclight
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Land of windmills, tulips, wooden shoes and cheese. Lots of cheese.
Posts: 8,467
Downloads: 53
Uploads: 10
Default

Yes, spot on.

Also, having a torpedo strike at less then 90deg angle will reduce duds, because the forces exerted on the pin are reduced as well. I aim for around 75deg.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteamWake
At least it was un-escorted evidently.
Obviously.

I hate destroyers, and they're not particularly fond of me either.

Too bad you got sunk. Let's hope that the lessons learned that day live on to save another crew someday.
__________________

Contritium praecedit superbia.
Arclight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-08, 03:39 PM   #11
SteamWake
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 13,224
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Orion2012
Isn't the chance of a dud reduced by 50% when firing with the slow setting??

I mean it would make sense to mdel that, especially giving the nature of what caused the duds. (The pin being crushed from the force)
Possibly true. Would be news to me though :hmm: Ill have to consider this if it can be confirmed.

However in retrospect I still would have used the fast settings. Ive attacked this type of convoy before and watched in disbelief as they altered course nearly as soon as the torps left the tubes resulting in a bunch of misses.

So now I get in close and fire them at fast so even if they do react they prob wont be able to in time. Out of a salvo of 4 you would think at least one would go off.
SteamWake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-08, 03:50 PM   #12
Orion2012
Commodore
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 611
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SteamWake
Quote:
Originally Posted by Orion2012
Isn't the chance of a dud reduced by 50% when firing with the slow setting??

I mean it would make sense to mdel that, especially giving the nature of what caused the duds. (The pin being crushed from the force)
Possibly true. Would be news to me though :hmm: Ill have to consider this if it can be confirmed.

However in retrospect I still would have used the fast settings. Ive attacked this type of convoy before and watched in disbelief as they altered course nearly as soon as the torps left the tubes resulting in a bunch of misses.

So now I get in close and fire them at fast so even if they do react they prob wont be able to in time. Out of a salvo of 4 you would think at least one would go off.
This came from the RFB forum:http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/show...postcount=1176


But out of 4 torpedoes, you would think at least one would go off, but certainly makes you realize how some skippers were convinced the malfunctions were caused by an error in OP, not an equipment malfunction
Orion2012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-08, 07:21 PM   #13
Atony94
Seaman
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 36
Downloads: 12
Uploads: 0
Default

ah nice find orion im sure that will help a bunch of people.

You know if your like me (realism rating 35) you dont need to worry about duds, if it makes you feel better you can throw a can at your computer after every..2 torpedo shots.
Atony94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-08, 08:29 PM   #14
Orion2012
Commodore
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 611
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Atony94
ah nice find orion im sure that will help a bunch of people.

You know if your like me (realism rating 35) you dont need to worry about duds, if it makes you feel better you can throw a can at your computer after every..2 torpedo shots.
I don't mind the dudes so much, as later in the war they aren't a problem, and since Luke pointed out the slow speed setting, I'd say 70% of my contacts that I close within 1000yards of go down. Not that is of course still excluding DD's and most any Warship as slow torpedoes are easily dodged.
Orion2012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-08, 01:15 AM   #15
bookworm_020
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sinking ships off the Australian coast
Posts: 5,966
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
Default

Ouch!

Well take comfort in the fact that it happened like that in real life. I think 16 duds in a row was the record!
bookworm_020 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.