![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: May 2006
Location: BA8758, or FN33eh for my fellow hams.
Posts: 833
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I know it's post WWII, but I suppose you could cheat
![]() ![]() ![]() Cut out the two wheels, and pin them together along with something for a cursor. Google "Bearing Rate Computer" to find instructions on how to use it.
__________________
The U-Boat Commander of Love |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]()
Pretty awesome! Do you know what year that circular slide rule of yours came from? Do we know for sure that nothing like that was used during the war? I know they did bearing rate plots and derived enemy relative course and speed. They must have had a similar tool but I bet it was a straight slide rule (a slip-stick), not a circular one.
This is important because bearing rate charts were extensively used by the real submarines and we don't use them at all.
__________________
Sub Skipper's Bag of Tricks, Slightly Subnuclear Mk 14 & Cutie, Slightly Subnuclear Deck Gun, EZPlot 2.0, TMOPlot, TMOKeys, SH4CMS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: May 2006
Location: BA8758, or FN33eh for my fellow hams.
Posts: 833
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
For targeting problems, they used the Submarine Attack Course Finder/IS-WAS. It was also a circular slide rule, and this thread has all you need to make and use one:
http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=106923
__________________
The U-Boat Commander of Love |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: AN9771
Posts: 4,904
Downloads: 304
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Are you sure they are only 2 disks, and not supposed to be 4 free rotating scales?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: May 2006
Location: BA8758, or FN33eh for my fellow hams.
Posts: 833
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
You know what, I think you may be right. Here is an actual photograph of one:
![]() So really the only difference is that you print each page twice, and cut them out appropriately. Good catch. I never really used it much, I just made one and fiddled with it a bit.
__________________
The U-Boat Commander of Love |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: AN9771
Posts: 4,904
Downloads: 304
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Yeah, I noticed the 90 degree mark (sine scale) was against about 4050 yards (pretty much 2nm) so I started wondering if that relation was important. But then I thought "closest point of approach" calculations or matching AOB vs range would allways come out the same. That can't be good. It's probably in that state because of the last user's calculation, before photocopying.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: May 2006
Location: BA8758, or FN33eh for my fellow hams.
Posts: 833
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
The U-Boat Commander of Love |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,012
Downloads: 102
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
(Yeah..right ![]() Thanks for the calculator...
__________________
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|