Darwinists offer $1M prize for Test Tube Meat

[SUBMAN1]

Just the idea sounds disgusting! :p

-S

PETA’s Latest Tactic: $1 Million for Fake Meat

By JOHN SCHWARTZ
Published: April 21, 2008


People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals wants to pay a million dollars for fake meat — even if it has caused a “near civil war” within the organization.

The organization said it would announce plans on Monday for a $1 million prize to the “first person to come up with a method to produce commercially viable quantities of in vitro meat at competitive prices by 2012.” ...

Read on here - http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/21/us...3femioGEjaUjYw

[STEED]

Fake Meat

:rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl:

[CCIP]

Ewwwww


I'm all for ethical treatment of animals, but I'm sort of for ethical treatment of humans too. Including eating more or less naturally.

I don't even eat much meat (sometimes I go for weeks without eating any, actually), but I think it's absurd to deny the nature of a sizeable part of humanity as omnivores in the truest sense. :hmm:

[SUBMAN1]

Soylent Green

[Spoon 11th]

In vitro meat will be one of the biggest things of this century that will change our lives. I'm anxiously waiting for it.

[STEED]

Originally Posted by SUBMAN1

Soylent Green

"Soylent Green is People."

[Spoon 11th]

Originally Posted by SUBMAN1

Soylent Green

In vitro human flesh? I'd eat that, more preferably even than in vitro animal meat. It's just nutrients.

[Letum]

What on earth does this have to do with Darwin?!
He wasn't a vegetarian!

Ethical treatment of animals does not exclude eating them.

[joegrundman]

What's Peta got to do with darwinism?

EDIT: cross post (i think, or maybe i just didn't scroll down far enough)

[Konovalov]

Perhaps Subman is guessing that anyone who is a member of PETA must be a Darwinist. In any case "Darwinists" were in no way mentioned in the New York Times article. Misleading topic title of the day award.

[nikimcbee]

Isn't that what tofu is? They have tofu/soy sausages. You can send the check to me.

[Tchocky]

I suggest a title change to what's actually happening

[SUBMAN1]

The title is very appropriate.

-S

[Konovalov]

Originally Posted by SUBMAN1

The title is very appropriate.

-S

How so?

[SUBMAN1]

Originally Posted by Konovalov

How so?

Because it makes sense.

An article for you:

In Praise of PETA

By Chuck Colson
2/12/2008

It has taken me a long time to get to this point, but I am finally ready to praise People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, or as they are more commonly known, PETA. This organization really gets it when it comes to worldview. In fact, PETA accepts and follows the logical consequences of a worldview better than almost any other group I can think of.



Let me explain.


Today is Darwin Day, the 199th anniversary of the birth of Charles Darwin. The Darwin Day Celebration website explains that Darwin Day “is an international celebration of science and humanity.” The site suggests that we hold “civic ceremonies with official proclamations, educational symposia, birthday parties, art shows, book discussions, lobby days, games, protests, and dinner parties.”


If you think that sounds a little excessive, you ain’t seen nothing yet. As Regis Nicoll wrote on our blog, The Point, next year will be proclaimed “the year of Darwin” to celebrate Darwin’s 200th birthday. British organizations are planning an “Evolution Megalab” to teach visitors of all ages how to “see evolution at work in the natural world around them.” And that will be just one of “an unequalled spate of high-profile broadcasting and public events throughout the world.”


Here’s where PETA comes in. PETA was celebrating Darwin Day long before there was an official Darwin Day. You can see it in everything it does—from its ads comparing the slaughter of animals to the Holocaust, to PETA founder Ingrid Newkirk’s famous statement that “When it comes to pain, love, joy, loneliness, and fear, a rat is a pig is a dog is a boy.”


What does that have to do with Darwinism? Everything. To a Darwinist, you see, there is no distinction between human beings and animals. We all came about by chance; we are made of the same “stuff,” and we all end up as nothing more than dust. Instead of recognizing humans as bearers of God’s image, Darwinism sees us as nothing more than competitively successful bipeds with opposable thumbs. Forget any talk of human dignity.


And that is exactly the worldview that PETA lives by. If Darwinism—which we teach in the schools—is true, then they are right: Slaughtering and eating animals is just as bad as the Holocaust. It is cannibalism. If Darwinism is true, then PETA was correct when it recently compared the American Kennel Club to the Ku Klux Klan for trying to create a “master race” of dogs. Charles Darwin and Ingrid Newkirk are so much on the same page that without Darwin, there could be no PETA. It is a perfect example of following a worldview to its logical conclusion.


You have gathered by now, I hope, that the first part of this commentary was satirical. But it is no joke that the kind of thinking I am describing is exactly what the Darwinian worldview can lead to. Darwin Day is not really about parties and science fairs; it is about a total loss of moral transcendence and the loss of dignity of human life.


And the real tragedy is that people like PETA are more faithful in following their worldview than many Christians are in following ours. Christians who buy into Darwinian evolution need to understand what they are really saying: that their God considers them of no more value than a rat, or a pig, or a dog.