activ sonar on IJN Destroyers

Indy676 · 01-15-08, 01:18 AM

Hy Kaleuns

Sorry, if there are already Threads of this theme, but could find nothing.

I have read in my Books, that the IJN didnt have avtiv sonar. In the net, there are other statements. Can someone with real knowlege help me a litle?
THX

Gruß Indy

swdw · 01-15-08, 01:20 AM

Yes they had it although not all IJN destroyers were equipped with it at the start of the war. Also the skill level varied from ship to ship.

Sailor Steve · 01-15-08, 02:53 PM

I can't consult my books right now, but I'm certain that most of their destroyers had it. The problem they encountered in the early part of the war was the lack of destroyers for escort work. Small patrol boats were pressed into service, some of them without listening equipment at all. In fact, there are records of convoys sailing with the only escort being a merchant ship with depth-charge rails on the stern.

Later in the war, though: well, we did lose more than a few subs, and they weren't sunk by luck and chance. The Japanese knew what they were doing by mid-war, and they did it quite well.

ekempey · 01-15-08, 05:01 PM

In "Clear the Bridge" Dick O'Kane mentioned during the USS Tang's fifth patrol that they were being hunted by an older destroyer using its fathometer as active sonar, just an interesting tidbit.

Zero Niner · 01-15-08, 07:41 PM

Kaluens? Excuse me, this is the USN part of the board! :rotfl:

Kaleun Klink · 01-15-08, 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zero Niner

Kaluens? Excuse me, this is the USN part of the board! :rotfl:

Haha, of course you are right, mein fellow Amerikaner. Nicht Deutsche kaleuns have infiltrated ze USN of course, haha! We are all in der Atlantik I mean they are all in the Atlantik, say, how about that Rita Hayworth, boy, she is some good-looking strudel, ja?

Ducimus · 01-15-08, 08:01 PM

Ummmmm..... ja.

ACHTUNG! ALLES LOOKENSPEEPERS!
Das boot ist nicht fuer gefingerpoken und mittengrabben. Ist easy schnappen der springenwerk, blowenfusen und poppencorken mit spitzensparken. Ist nicht fuer gewerken bei das dumpkopfen. Das rubbernecken sichtseeren keepen das cotten-pickenen hans in das pockets muss; relaxen und watchen das blinkenlichten.

Or something like that

01-15-08, 01:18 AM	#1
Indy676 Sailor man Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Seehausen/Altmark Germany Posts: 44 Downloads: 6 Uploads: 0	activ sonar on IJN Destroyers Hy Kaleuns Sorry, if there are already Threads of this theme, but could find nothing. I have read in my Books, that the IJN didnt have avtiv sonar. In the net, there are other statements. Can someone with real knowlege help me a litle? THX Gruß Indy

01-15-08, 01:20 AM	#2
swdw Grey Wolf Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 921 Downloads: 75 Uploads: 0	Yes they had it although not all IJN destroyers were equipped with it at the start of the war. Also the skill level varied from ship to ship. __________________ "There are only two types of ships- submarines...... and targets" Unknown "you wouldn't catch me on a ship that deliberately sinks itself"- comment to me from a surface sailor. System: AMD 6300 3.5 GHz \| 32GB DDR3 \| SATA 300 320GB HD, SATA III 1TB HD, SATA III 1.TB HD \| ASUS Sonar DS sound card NVIDIA 1660 Super OC \| Windows 10

01-15-08, 02:53 PM	#3
Sailor Steve Eternal Patrol Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: High in the mountains of Utah Posts: 50,369 Downloads: 745 Uploads: 249	I can't consult my books right now, but I'm certain that most of their destroyers had it. The problem they encountered in the early part of the war was the lack of destroyers for escort work. Small patrol boats were pressed into service, some of them without listening equipment at all. In fact, there are records of convoys sailing with the only escort being a merchant ship with depth-charge rails on the stern. Later in the war, though: well, we did lose more than a few subs, and they weren't sunk by luck and chance. The Japanese knew what they were doing by mid-war, and they did it quite well. __________________ “Never do anything you can't take back.” —Rocky Russo

01-15-08, 05:01 PM	#4
ekempey Gunner Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 95 Downloads: 31 Uploads: 0	In "Clear the Bridge" Dick O'Kane mentioned during the USS Tang's fifth patrol that they were being hunted by an older destroyer using its fathometer as active sonar, just an interesting tidbit.

01-15-08, 07:41 PM	#5
Zero Niner Ace of the Deep Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 1,033 Downloads: 69 Uploads: 0	Kaluens? Excuse me, this is the USN part of the board! :rotfl:

01-15-08, 08:01 PM	#7
Ducimus Rear Admiral Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 12,987 Downloads: 67 Uploads: 2	Ummmmm..... ja. ACHTUNG! ALLES LOOKENSPEEPERS! Das boot ist nicht fuer gefingerpoken und mittengrabben. Ist easy schnappen der springenwerk, blowenfusen und poppencorken mit spitzensparken. Ist nicht fuer gewerken bei das dumpkopfen. Das rubbernecken sichtseeren keepen das cotten-pickenen hans in das pockets muss; relaxen und watchen das blinkenlichten. Or something like that