SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Silent Hunter 3 - 4 - 5 > Silent Hunter 4: Wolves of the Pacific
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-26-07, 09:39 PM   #1
pocatellodave
Engineer
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Pocatello,ID
Posts: 203
Downloads: 92
Uploads: 0
Default Fuel realism?

I have a humble opinion in regards to fuel consumption.I believe that we might give the Subs a little more legs,as I try to be frugal,but I'm always coming up short,and thus ruining a patrol.I know,turn off limited fuel,but I really don't wish to do that.I'm already at 85% with TM 1.4,and I try to keep it as realistic as I can within the way I like to play SH4.I decided not to mess with the icons not having pointers,so I will just have to adjust in lining up shots.I was hoping there would be line in cfg. that we might adjust to get a wee bit more mileage out of are boats.
Pocatellodave
pocatellodave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-07, 10:09 PM   #2
Ducimus
Rear Admiral
 
Ducimus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 12,987
Downloads: 67
Uploads: 2


Default

Oriiginally I set the fuel to what was most likey the closest fuel setting the lead boat of a given class was. Most hover around 12,000 NM @ 10 kts, give or take a few hundred NM.

Later on i increased that slightly by making it (Historical range) @ 10.95 kts, which in effect added 1000 to 2000 more NM onto your range, higher then what is listed historically, but less then stock.

Stock fuel settings are 15,000 NM @ 10 kts for all boats except S class and porpoise i think. In TM's support directory theres an optional mod that has boats with stock fuel ranges. If you need more fuel then that, well i cant help ya except to point you to TT's tweaker so you can adjust the submarines sim files to your liking.

edit: Just FYI, optimum cruising speed is at ahead 2/3rds. If your putting along at 1/3rd your actually wating fuel and shortening your range.
Ducimus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-07, 09:46 AM   #3
pocatellodave
Engineer
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Pocatello,ID
Posts: 203
Downloads: 92
Uploads: 0
Default

Thank you for your reply.I will follow your instructions.Excuse my stupidity.You have worked hard to get your mod as great as it is.I had no right to complain,because I had no data to back up my grumbling.
Pocatellodave

Last edited by pocatellodave; 07-27-07 at 09:57 AM.
pocatellodave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-07, 10:03 AM   #4
Ducimus
Rear Admiral
 
Ducimus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 12,987
Downloads: 67
Uploads: 2


Default

Meh, when it comes to fuel, (and being depth charged), im a masochist, so people gotta keep my in check.
Ducimus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-07, 10:18 AM   #5
SteamWake
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 13,224
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ducimus
Meh, when it comes to fuel, (and being depth charged), im a masochist, so people gotta keep my in check.
The check is in the mail :p
SteamWake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-07, 10:49 AM   #6
Rockin Robbins
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: DeLand, FL
Posts: 8,900
Downloads: 135
Uploads: 52


Default Proviso on best speed

If you're trying to stretch range, Ducimus has hit right on. I find that 2/3 throttle is not 10 knots though. Would adjusting to 10 knots give me a tweak more range?

But my proviso is that sometimes max range isn't what you're looking for. You have an assignment to patrol Honshu island. This means you have to hang out within 75 miles of the star (correct me if I'm wrong about the range) for 48 hours and then phone home. So you use your compass and plot the 70 mile circle around the star (fudge factor there) and lay out a search pattern. You might just be interested in using as little fuel during the 48 hours as possible.

Of course you could stop engines and use no fuel at all. But I'm sure you want to get some little bit accomplished while you're waiting for the periscope shears to rust. In this case, the lowest acceptable throttle setting will burn the least fuel during the 48 hours. Yeah, I know, it's obvious. Track your time. Don't forget to phone home! No credit if you don't. Now go kill something.
Rockin Robbins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-07, 05:25 PM   #7
ElAurens
A-ganger
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 76
Downloads: 19
Uploads: 0
Default

Indeed 2/3rds. in a Gato in TM 1.3a is 8 knots on a smooth sea. I have been bumping it to 10 knots, but have no idea if this is optimum fuel economy or not.
__________________


" And the sea shall grant each man new hope, as sleep brings dreams of home." Christopher Columbus
ElAurens is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-07, 05:36 PM   #8
LukeFF
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Riverside, California
Posts: 3,610
Downloads: 41
Uploads: 5
Default

When I'm patrolling in a certain area for x number of hours I usually throttle down to 5 or 6 knots. The point of patrolling an area is to find targets, not trying to get from Point A to Point B in the shortest amount of time possible. Of course, the other benefit is decreased fuel consumption.
LukeFF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-07, 07:17 PM   #9
switch.dota
Captain
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Romania
Posts: 492
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

2/3 is 40% engine power. That's not optimal cruise speed no matter how you look at it. On all fleet boats, that's only 8knots or so. Optimal speed is 10knots. In TM you have the option to check range @ current speed. Do that at various speeds and you'll notice which is best.
switch.dota is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.