SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-03-07, 02:01 PM   #1
Heibges
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: San Francisco, California
Posts: 1,633
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
Default @ Skybird - opposite of Blitzkrieg

Hi Skybird,

I'm trying to remember the German phrase for the opposite of Blitzkrieg.

If I remember blitzkrieg is "rapid manuever for the purpose of seizing key terrain".

But I can't remember the German phrase for "rapid maneuver for the purpose of destroying troops."

Any ideas?
__________________
U.Kdt.Hdb B. I. 28) This possibility of using the hydrophone to help in detecting surface ships should, however, be restricted to those cases where the submarine is unavoidably compelled to stay below the surface.

http://www.hackworth.com/
Heibges is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-07, 02:14 PM   #2
TteFAboB
Admiral
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,247
Downloads: 4
Uploads: 0
Default

Rambokrieg? Rushkrieg? Zergrush?
__________________
"Tout ce qui est exagéré est insignifiant." ("All that is exaggerated is insignificant.") - Talleyrand
TteFAboB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-07, 03:13 PM   #3
Skybird
Soaring
 
Skybird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: the mental asylum named Germany
Posts: 42,602
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Heibges
Hi Skybird,

I'm trying to remember the German phrase for the opposite of Blitzkrieg.

If I remember blitzkrieg is "rapid manuever for the purpose of seizing key terrain".

But I can't remember the German phrase for "rapid maneuver for the purpose of destroying troops."

Any ideas?
Sorry, no idea. Can't remember that we have a special phrase for that kind of warfare you are describing. I would have listed both your categories under "Blitzkrieg". I do not see you two categories as opposites, btw.

Only seek&destroy comes to my mind. But obviously, that is not German, and means something slightly different.

A separate phrase I know is "Grabenkrieg", which translates into "trench warfare".

The German word for "war" is "Krieg", which in ancient German (Althochdeutsch) was "Chreg", and that meant "obstinacy" (Hartnäckigkeit).

Is there an English word for what you mean?
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert.
Skybird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-07, 03:18 PM   #4
Heibges
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: San Francisco, California
Posts: 1,633
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skybird
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heibges
Hi Skybird,

I'm trying to remember the German phrase for the opposite of Blitzkrieg.

If I remember blitzkrieg is "rapid manuever for the purpose of seizing key terrain".

But I can't remember the German phrase for "rapid maneuver for the purpose of destroying troops."

Any ideas?
Sorry, no idea. Can't remember that we have a special phrase for that kind of warfare you are describing. I would have listed both your categories under "Blitzkrieg".

Only seek&destroy comes to my mind. But obviously, that is not German, and means something slightly different.

A separate phrase I know is "Grabenkrieg", which translates into "trench warfare".

The German word for "war" is "Krieg", which in ancient German (Althochdeutsch) was "Chreg", and that meant "obstinacy" (Hartnäckigkeit).

Is there an English word for what you mean?
No, it's impossible to express as a single word in English. I remember it in terms of the Battle of Kiev.

I think in German it might start out "verr....or vern...or verrn".

Anyway, basically the author's point was that the German Army was practicing "ver....." in reducing Kiev, when they should have been practicing Blitzkrieg, driving towards Moscow.

The term I am trying to think of far predates blitzkrieg, and I think may have started in the Franco-Prussian War.
__________________
U.Kdt.Hdb B. I. 28) This possibility of using the hydrophone to help in detecting surface ships should, however, be restricted to those cases where the submarine is unavoidably compelled to stay below the surface.

http://www.hackworth.com/
Heibges is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-07, 03:31 PM   #5
fatty
The Old Man
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,448
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Heibges
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skybird
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heibges
Hi Skybird,

I'm trying to remember the German phrase for the opposite of Blitzkrieg.

If I remember blitzkrieg is "rapid manuever for the purpose of seizing key terrain".

But I can't remember the German phrase for "rapid maneuver for the purpose of destroying troops."

Any ideas?
Sorry, no idea. Can't remember that we have a special phrase for that kind of warfare you are describing. I would have listed both your categories under "Blitzkrieg".

Only seek&destroy comes to my mind. But obviously, that is not German, and means something slightly different.

A separate phrase I know is "Grabenkrieg", which translates into "trench warfare".

The German word for "war" is "Krieg", which in ancient German (Althochdeutsch) was "Chreg", and that meant "obstinacy" (Hartnäckigkeit).

Is there an English word for what you mean?
No, it's impossible to express as a single word in English. I remember it in terms of the Battle of Kiev.

I think in German it might start out "verr....or vern...or verrn".

Anyway, basically the author's point was that the German Army was practicing "ver....." in reducing Kiev, when they should have been practicing Blitzkrieg, driving towards Moscow.

The term I am trying to think of far predates blitzkrieg, and I think may have started in the Franco-Prussian War.
Sounds like attrition to me. Is there a German word for that?
fatty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-07, 03:43 PM   #6
Lurchi
Planesman
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Wilhelmshaven, Germany
Posts: 181
Downloads: 35
Uploads: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heibges
No, it's impossible to express as a single word in English. I remember it in terms of the Battle of Kiev.

I think in German it might start out "verr....or vern...or verrn".
Vernichten?
Vernichtungsschlacht?

The most common german description for the Battle of Kiev is "Kesselschlacht". This term was used when a complete encirclement was achieved and total annihilation (=Vernichtung) of the surrounded enemy forces became the goal.

During Barbarossa the Central german army group disbanded the Blizkrieg strategy (=continue the drive towards Moscow) for some time in favour of the Kiev Kesselschlacht. Hitler ordered this change in strategy because he was afraid of this massive enemy troop concentration behind the german front and decided to annihilate those. Most front commanders, like Guderian were against this strategy change because they considered this change as a waste of time and resources.


Attrition = Abnutzung
Lurchi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-07, 04:47 PM   #7
Heibges
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: San Francisco, California
Posts: 1,633
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
Default

Vernichtungsschlacht

Luchi you are my new hero.

I am almost 100% sure that is the term I was looking for.

Thank you very much.
__________________
U.Kdt.Hdb B. I. 28) This possibility of using the hydrophone to help in detecting surface ships should, however, be restricted to those cases where the submarine is unavoidably compelled to stay below the surface.

http://www.hackworth.com/
Heibges is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-07, 04:49 PM   #8
Skybird
Soaring
 
Skybird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: the mental asylum named Germany
Posts: 42,602
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fatty
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heibges
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skybird
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heibges
Hi Skybird,

I'm trying to remember the German phrase for the opposite of Blitzkrieg.

If I remember blitzkrieg is "rapid manuever for the purpose of seizing key terrain".

But I can't remember the German phrase for "rapid maneuver for the purpose of destroying troops."

Any ideas?
Sorry, no idea. Can't remember that we have a special phrase for that kind of warfare you are describing. I would have listed both your categories under "Blitzkrieg".

Only seek&destroy comes to my mind. But obviously, that is not German, and means something slightly different.

A separate phrase I know is "Grabenkrieg", which translates into "trench warfare".

The German word for "war" is "Krieg", which in ancient German (Althochdeutsch) was "Chreg", and that meant "obstinacy" (Hartnäckigkeit).

Is there an English word for what you mean?
No, it's impossible to express as a single word in English. I remember it in terms of the Battle of Kiev.

I think in German it might start out "verr....or vern...or verrn".

Anyway, basically the author's point was that the German Army was practicing "ver....." in reducing Kiev, when they should have been practicing Blitzkrieg, driving towards Moscow.

The term I am trying to think of far predates blitzkrieg, and I think may have started in the Franco-Prussian War.
Sounds like attrition to me. Is there a German word for that?
War of attrition: Abnutzungskrieg. It means a long conflict where nobody can gain the upper hand but both sides are loosing blood and more and more of it. Prime example: the "Materialschlachten" of WWI.
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert.
Skybird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-07, 04:53 PM   #9
Skybird
Soaring
 
Skybird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: the mental asylum named Germany
Posts: 42,602
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0


Default

Yes, Vernichtungsschlacht. But it is no real category of war theory, I think, for it is too wide and unprecise in it's meaning: every war is about destruction of the enemy, annihilation of any oppositon standing in the way of one's own goials. Whereas "Kesselschlacht" has a clear definition that describes the tactical situation of hostile forces completly surrounded and isolated and being battered until they are surrendering or are annihilated.
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert.
Skybird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-07, 05:17 PM   #10
waste gate
Stowaway
 
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
Default

Another word(s) for it may be the United Nations.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-07, 05:46 PM   #11
Heibges
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: San Francisco, California
Posts: 1,633
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skybird
Yes, Vernichtungsschlacht. But it is no real category of war theory, I think, for it is too wide and unprecise in it's meaning: every war is about destruction of the enemy, annihilation of any oppositon standing in the way of one's own goials. Whereas "Kesselschlacht" has a clear definition that describes the tactical situation of hostile forces completly surrounded and isolated and being battered until they are surrendering or are annihilated.
The author of the book I saw it in could very well have been confused. I can't even remember the book or the author, just the word.
__________________
U.Kdt.Hdb B. I. 28) This possibility of using the hydrophone to help in detecting surface ships should, however, be restricted to those cases where the submarine is unavoidably compelled to stay below the surface.

http://www.hackworth.com/
Heibges is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-07, 03:12 AM   #12
AntEater
Grey Wolf
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 936
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Maybe it has allready been answered, but I'd say "Vernichtungskrieg" (war of anihilation).
But I am not sure wether this term is really contemporary, meaning actually used during WW2 or having been invented after WW2 to describe the eastern front.
Regarding US WW2 strategy, the term "Abnutzungskrieg" was used (war of attrition) while soldiers called it "der Krieg des reichen Mannes" (rich man's way of war).
__________________
AntEater is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.