SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-18-07, 07:11 PM   #1
TarJak
Fleet Admiral
 
TarJak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,052
Downloads: 150
Uploads: 8


Default HMAS Kanimbla Black Hawk Helicopter Crash footage

Amazing footage of the crash of an Australian Army Black Hawk crashing on the deck of HMAS Kanimbla in November 2006:

http://media.fairfax.com.au/?sy=smh&...News&rid=29076

Story on the inquest here:
http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/...019030678.html
TarJak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-07, 09:31 PM   #2
Mush Martin
Eternal Patrol
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,398
Downloads: 4
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TarJak
Amazing footage of the crash of an Australian Army Black Hawk crashing on the deck of HMAS Kanimbla in November 2006:

http://media.fairfax.com.au/?sy=smh&...News&rid=29076

Story on the inquest here:
http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/...019030678.html

Wow video link flopped but the story worked out fine.
Here in Canada we have our share of Poor helicopters and subs.
but both ship and aircraft are of a good variety there. nasty buisness
although 2500m to recover the data and the body were impressive feats.
Sad to hear none the less albeit a year late in my case.
MM
__________________
RIP Mush



Tutorial
Mush Martin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-07, 10:56 PM   #3
bookworm_020
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sinking ships off the Australian coast
Posts: 5,966
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
Default

Most of the Collins class sub's problems have been solved. With the helicopters, they have gien the go ahead to finish the Sea sprite helicopters. The black hawk that crashed did so in dangerous conditions, so that one is human error.

The other black hawk crashes have been put down to some of the hazadous conditions they fly and train in.

Still it's sad that it happened, and hopeful won't be repeated.
bookworm_020 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-07, 12:20 AM   #4
Reaves
The Old Man
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,509
Downloads: 4
Uploads: 0
Default

I just heard on the radio that they released this footage before one of the survivors saw it. How arogant is our military not to consult him in a matter like this.
__________________
Reaves is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-07, 01:26 AM   #5
TarJak
Fleet Admiral
 
TarJak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,052
Downloads: 150
Uploads: 8


Default

Mate it was a civilian court that let me media release it. I agree it's digusting.

If the SMH link doesn't work the video's are now on You tube in several forms:




TarJak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-07, 01:59 AM   #6
Reaves
The Old Man
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,509
Downloads: 4
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TarJak
Mate it was a civilian court that let me media release it. I agree it's digusting.

If the SMH link doesn't work the video's are now on You tube in several forms:





Guilty of speaking without knowing the facts. Again...

I take back my comment and direct it at the civilian courts. They should have at least given them warning about it. Instead of allowing a survivor to be surprised at dinner time by seeing something like this on tv.
__________________
Reaves is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-07, 02:45 AM   #7
TarJak
Fleet Admiral
 
TarJak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,052
Downloads: 150
Uploads: 8


Default

I might got it slightly wrong too. The justice presiding at the inquest is a civilian but the inquest is military. To quote the article "A damning Senate report into abuses of the military justice system led to changes to the board of inquiry process, including the appointment of civilians as president. Justice Levine is the first civilian in a major inquiry since the changes."

Another example of no-one caring about the little guy's feelings though.

Still its amazing there were survivors given the impact on the deck and the quick sinking.

The inquiry was told that the Army took out or did not order the inflatable bags thatthe UH-60 can be equipped with that would have slowed the sinking, to save money. If these had been installed the pilot and the other guy who died might have had time to get out of the wreck. Apparently the pilot's helmet snagged on the aerial as he tried to escape but drowned as a result of not having time to get free.

Another example of our penny pinching military not looking after its people.
TarJak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-07, 03:29 AM   #8
bookworm_020
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sinking ships off the Australian coast
Posts: 5,966
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TarJak
The inquiry was told that the Army took out or did not order the inflatable bags thatthe UH-60 can be equipped with that would have slowed the sinking, to save money.
Close, but not quite. The Army had considered having the floatation bags, but decided against it, due to the fact that even though it would slow the sinking of the aircraft, it would also slow the exit of the passangers and crew.

A tough choice in which there will always be a "Maybe"
bookworm_020 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-07, 03:41 AM   #9
darius359au
Stowaway
 
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
Default

The military and the goverment tried to stop the crash video being released but the judge ignored them and released it because the media wanted it and said it "Was in the Public intrest" - what about the intrests of the survivours and the families?
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-07, 04:19 AM   #10
TarJak
Fleet Admiral
 
TarJak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,052
Downloads: 150
Uploads: 8


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bookworm_020
Quote:
Originally Posted by TarJak
The inquiry was told that the Army took out or did not order the inflatable bags thatthe UH-60 can be equipped with that would have slowed the sinking, to save money.
Close, but not quite. The Army had considered having the floatation bags, but decided against it, due to the fact that even though it would slow the sinking of the aircraft, it would also slow the exit of the passangers and crew.

A tough choice in which there will always be a "Maybe"
Thanks for correcting, I heard this morning on Ch9 that it was a cost saving measure. One of the SAS troopers (A clearance diver), reckoned he didn't get out until the chopper was 20-30m underwater based on the rate at which he was clearing his ears and how long it took him to get to the surface. (He actually hit the hull of the Kanimbla on the way up!)

I know there will always be maybe's but if it sunk slower I think they might have all made it. It will be interesting to see what the inquest concludes.
TarJak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-07, 04:03 AM   #11
TarJak
Fleet Admiral
 
TarJak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,052
Downloads: 150
Uploads: 8


Default



This report says the Army left off the flotation devices because they "undermined performance in and escape, meant significant modifcation and were expensive."


I leave it up to you to opine on which was the deciding factor.
TarJak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-07, 02:21 AM   #12
baggygreen
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Canberra, ACT, Down Under (really On Top)
Posts: 1,880
Downloads: 7
Uploads: 0
Default

To this i would also like to add, (according to an "experienced chopper pilot" who wrote to my local paper)

the Kanimbla was not headed into the wind, but moving with it. meaning the chopper's tail rotor stalled, they lost control and began counterrotating, and boom.

this may explain why the military didnt want the footage released.. it shows not pilot error but error on the command and control component of the crew.

if its true, of course.
baggygreen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-07, 02:40 PM   #13
Heibges
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: San Francisco, California
Posts: 1,633
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reaves
Quote:
Originally Posted by TarJak
Mate it was a civilian court that let me media release it. I agree it's digusting.

If the SMH link doesn't work the video's are now on You tube in several forms:





Guilty of speaking without knowing the facts. Again...

I take back my comment and direct it at the civilian courts. They should have at least given them warning about it. Instead of allowing a survivor to be surprised at dinner time by seeing something like this on tv.
Media will show anything that gets them ratings. It was sickening how many times they played the 9/11 Footage of the planes crashing and the towers falling.
__________________
U.Kdt.Hdb B. I. 28) This possibility of using the hydrophone to help in detecting surface ships should, however, be restricted to those cases where the submarine is unavoidably compelled to stay below the surface.

http://www.hackworth.com/
Heibges is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-07, 02:43 PM   #14
Tchocky
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,874
Downloads: 6
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Heibges
Media will show anything that gets them ratings. It was sickening how many times they played the 9/11 Footage of the planes crashing and the towers falling.
Well, it was sort of, news.
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Tchocky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-07, 02:58 PM   #15
Heibges
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: San Francisco, California
Posts: 1,633
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tchocky
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heibges
Media will show anything that gets them ratings. It was sickening how many times they played the 9/11 Footage of the planes crashing and the towers falling.
Well, it was sort of, news.
I agree that it was news and needed to be reported. But replaying the actually footage hundreds and hundreds of times was repugnant.
__________________
U.Kdt.Hdb B. I. 28) This possibility of using the hydrophone to help in detecting surface ships should, however, be restricted to those cases where the submarine is unavoidably compelled to stay below the surface.

http://www.hackworth.com/
Heibges is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.