![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Sonar Guy
![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Newfoundland,Canada
Posts: 398
Downloads: 6
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Thats a little harsh...I mean I Sunk like 70000 tons that patrol and got bombed by planes on the way back, Survived and got put in Jail.
No respect i tell ya! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Helmsman
![]() Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 106
Downloads: 32
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I want to know how I get put in jail after my sub sinks to 2000 feet.
I wanted to go down with the ship, damnit! ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Eternal Patrol
![]() |
![]()
Yes, anytime something bad happens a court-martial is held. Usually it's perfunctory, just so if anyone asks they can say they did it.
No, you should not be jailed just for losing your ship; especially when it's in the course of doing great things.
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.” —Rocky Russo |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: ~About 60' below
Posts: 1,150
Downloads: 7
Uploads: 0
|
![]() ![]() --- |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]()
The only American commander convincted and discharged by a court martial for losing his ship in WWII was the commander of the USS Indianapolis. As most people would agree, very unfairly so (someone just needed a scapegoat).
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Frogman
![]() Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: England
Posts: 300
Downloads: 15
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Loss of a ship, in any navy, for any reason, usually results in a court martial. At the very least there will be a court of inquiry, which will decide if a court martial is necessary. Remember a court martial is a trial, not a punishment. A court martial may order punishment or it may exonerate. It is not necessarily a bad thing, it may clear the captain's name.
__________________
"Pitt was the greatest fool who ever lived to encourage a mode of war which they who commanded the seas did not want, and which, if successful, would deprive them of it." Earl St.Vincent (allegedly) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Seaman
![]() Join Date: May 2005
Location: Seattle
Posts: 38
Downloads: 16
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Electrician's Mate
![]() Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: high above the big blue
Posts: 137
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Captain
![]() Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 545
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I always considered MacArther and Halsey to be the 2 most overated Military leaders the USA had in WW2. They just both knew how to play the reporters that's all.
As for why I consider Halsey to be overrated,all one has to do is look at his actions on the Doolittle Raid,(launched too soon just because they spotted and sank a sampan),The Phillipines Sea,(He left the transports he was supposed to be protecting just to chase after 4 Japanese Carriers that the US carriers had already sunk or seriously damaged...and the Yamato group damn near got to the transports while Halsey was off chasing already trashed carriers.),And running into a typhoon...not once,but twice. Leading to losses of ships and alot of men. Quite frankly,if Halsey had been in command at Midway I have no doubt that he would have managed to lose that battle. He would have continued to chase the Japanese fleet and would have run right into a night battle with Yammamoto's main fleet. Halsey was great for morale and propaganda...but not a very good fleet commander. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|