![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 936
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I am not sure how easy it is to make new ships compared to Sh3, but let's make a list of desirable additions:
I can think of the following: Matsu class destroyer escort Mass produced "cheap" destroyer of 1944/45, was surely often encountered by US subs. Most numerous large IJN vessel of 1945 T1 class fast transport Variant of the above as fast transport with a stern ramp to roll off landing craft/midget subs or other cargo Ukuru/Etoforu class escort. Most numerous IJN escort. Larger than the in game Kaibokan Subchaser, but smaller than a destroyer. The first were build before WW2 and mass production continued until 1945. One survived until 1997 as the last existing IJN WW2 vessel. Unryu class carrier: Minor modification of the Hiryu class for wartime mass production. "real" Mogami class cruiser Modify the existing Mogami into how she looked before Midway and how Suzuya and Kumano looked until their sinkings 1944. No plane deck and 2 turrets aft. "numbered" Patrol boat destroyer 1920s (Minekaze and earlier) destroyer with reduced armament and increased ASW equipment. Nagato Class Battleship (why is this one the only IJN BB missing?)
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Mexico, USA
Posts: 9,023
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 2
|
![]()
Yeah, the Ukuru, Type D, etc would be a welcome addition.
Another thing would be far more SMALL merchantmen. Fox Tares of under 1000 tons, and Sugar types (steel sea trucks) of similar size. ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
![]()
Modeling shouldn't be any harder.
You get more polys to work with for one thing. But you'll need to model 2 more objects for damage. Those look like wicked work to do right. |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Loader
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 87
Downloads: 14
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I Tone/Chikuma Class would be nice.
As would an Essex or Yorktown class carrier for the US |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 936
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
*bump*
How about making this one a sticky? As mentioned above, there is great variation potential in the 1920s/WW1 IJN destroyers, as all of them basically had the same hull shape, and there were tons of modifications of the basic Minekaze type alone, most of them for ASW. By removing a gun mount here and adding more DCs there and fiddling with the parameters, easily 3-4 additional classes could be created. Also, there are these "second rate" destroyers which are basically looking the same, only smaller. Also, I am strongly in favor of totally removing those river gunboats Running into a piece of decoration from "the sand pebbles" in the middle of the pacific ocean certainly feels strange.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Mexico, USA
Posts: 9,023
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 2
|
![]()
^^^ same goes for the "Clemson" Class (the USN didn't recognize such a class in 1943, they called them the "No. 186 to 347 Class"). That's because they are actually Wilkes Class, right? Wilkes was given tot he RN along with 79 more 4 stackers. Anyway, they were converted to the "flush deckers" as well as APDs, DMs, DMS, and AVDs. Quite a bit to do with the 4-stacker DDs!
tater |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|