![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 | |
Swabbie
![]() Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 14
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I first wrote about it at the Ubi forums since I am more active there then they gave me the idea to bring it here since I use GWX. 1.02
http://forums.ubi.com/eve/forums/a/t...3/m/9451084445 Anyway I did a test and found that planes intercepted me a great deal more when using the snorkel, here is what I wrote there : Quote:
I'de love any input anyone has on this ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Rear Admiral
![]() Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Swindon, England
Posts: 10,151
Downloads: 35
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
If you are not using a snorkel I assume you are submerged
If so you wont see aircraft while using a snorkel it is detectable by aircraft radar so you will see more of them ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Swabbie
![]() Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 14
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Maybe I wasn't clearly explaining.
I was using the GWX radar on snorkel mod to test this with the XXI, so I can see them while snorkling. Your 2nd point makes no sense. Very few planes have the .3 radar that can detect the snorkel, but almost all the planes can detect the surfaced uboat. Not to mention the surfaced boat is far easier to detect than the itty bitty .5 meter high snorkel.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Captain
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ensenada, B.C., Mexico
Posts: 504
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
![]() However I have no input to offer to you except for two things: 1) It was a very well known bug in SHIII stock that having the snorkel up made you just as detectable as having the whole sub surfaced ![]() 2) About your test: you shouldn't jump to conclusions yet. 10 sightings (each) isn't a lot in the realm of statistics... continue on with the tests and see if the observed trend holds up after.... 50 sightings for each test? :hmm: Unfortunately, I can't help much more than that, since I play dead is dead from the start of the war, so I've never managed to get my hands on a XXI ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Swabbie
![]() Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 14
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I do DiD too , but start my next career where the last one died in the war. So I eventualy made it on the 8th career to the XXI.. it was a major disapointment :P I ended up going back to my IXD2 so I could play duck hunt with the planes instead of hiding every few minutes which made travel very boring :P
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
![]() Quote:
Rubini just did a visual/hydrophone workaround with changes to these files. Maybe he or someone else could shed some light on this radar detection stuff. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Samurai Navy
![]() Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 554
Downloads: 14
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I would be curious to see if that made it into GWX or not.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Swabbie
![]() Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 14
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
If it were a matter of radar though I would be detected just as much on the surface and more. Especialy since I use the snokrel fix by Jungman that limits the minheight of visual detecting to 1 meter. So they can only detect the snorkel in theory with the last 2 rare ASW types.
Maybe the overall height of the uboat whether underwater or not controls the amount of planes likely to spawn?
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | ||
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: At periscope depth in Lake Geneva
Posts: 3,512
Downloads: 25
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Edit: Here is the thread http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=109545 |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|