SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Modern-Era Subsims > Dangerous Waters
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-12-07, 02:05 PM   #1
LoBlo
Subsim Diehard
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Texas!
Posts: 971
Downloads: 78
Uploads: 3
Default DW and RAM and Time Acceleration

I have a 2.gGhz Dell with a 512MB of RAM and a 128MB Radeo Graphics Card. It runs DW great... except in those very busy missions with lots of civillian traffic I can have some trouble with the 16x time accelerations...Not really a big deal, the 8x time acceleration still work great even when the missions is packed.

But my question is... do you think that upgrading to 2Gigs of RAM will improve the game performance when I'm time accelerating in those busy missions? Anyone else have problems with this?
__________________
"Seek not to offend or annoy... only to speak the truth"-a wise man
LoBlo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-07, 02:10 PM   #2
Looney11
Watch
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 23
Downloads: 14
Uploads: 0
Default

I don't think increasing your RAM will aliviate the problem. This has, in my view, mostly to do with raw computing power. With the time-compression set to high levels, the CPU of your PC is running a marathon calculating every position of each vehicle in the game. On top of this, it has to calculate, speed, course, depth, altitude and if this wasn't enough, with each movement made, the CPU has to calculate every single units doctrine to see if it will make a decision based on those doctrine files.

Needless to say, if all chucks along with TC set at 1, your CPU is in no hurry and can keep up with all of it without a hitch. Turn on the TC and you turn up the heat for the CPU, turn it really high and the CPU has some serious work to do and show you the results of that.

I run DW on an AMD 3800+ with 2Gb of ram and have not noticed a lot of performance boosting from it when cranking up the TC in a target rich enviroment.
__________________
Those who aim at nothing, will most certainly hit that!
Looney11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-07, 02:24 PM   #3
LuftWolf
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Free New York
Posts: 3,167
Downloads: 2
Uploads: 0
Default

And here I thought this was about IR guided anti-missile defense systems... :p

Cheers,
David
__________________
LW
LuftWolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-07, 02:28 PM   #4
LoBlo
Subsim Diehard
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Texas!
Posts: 971
Downloads: 78
Uploads: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Looney11
I don't think increasing your RAM will aliviate the problem. This has, in my view, mostly to do with raw computing power. With the time-compression set to high levels, the CPU of your PC is running a marathon calculating every position of each vehicle in the game. On top of this, it has to calculate, speed, course, depth, altitude and if this wasn't enough, with each movement made, the CPU has to calculate every single units doctrine to see if it will make a decision based on those doctrine files.

Needless to say, if all chucks along with TC set at 1, your CPU is in no hurry and can keep up with all of it without a hitch. Turn on the TC and you turn up the heat for the CPU, turn it really high and the CPU has some serious work to do and show you the results of that.

I run DW on an AMD 3800+ with 2Gb of ram and have not noticed a lot of performance boosting from it when cranking up the TC in a target rich enviroment.
Thanks

Quote:
Originally Posted by Luftwolf
And here I thought this was about IR guided anti-missile defense systems
heh. Nope, just a plain jane computer question
__________________
"Seek not to offend or annoy... only to speak the truth"-a wise man
LoBlo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-07, 07:19 AM   #5
Pisces
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: AN9771
Posts: 4,904
Downloads: 304
Uploads: 0
Default

Are you sure you have 'quit' or 'exit'-ed every unneccesary background process. For example the little icons near the windows clock(bottom right). Keep them as few as possible. No need to have like MSN eat up CPU cycles. Winamp probably eats up alot too. But there are also some running without a visible icon there. You can see which proccesses are running (in Win XP) by pressing ctrl-alt-delete and look at the processes tab. You can sort the list by pressing the CPU collumnheader to see which ones are most frequently run. But be carefull about killing them, some are required for a stable running windows. Search for their name and info on the web before actually stopping them. But sometimes I just risk it.
Pisces is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.