SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-16-07, 02:12 PM   #1
geetrue
Cold War Boomer
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Walla Walla
Posts: 2,837
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
Default Is the United States gearing up for an attack on Iran?



Quote:
The deployment of a second U.S. aircraft carrier to the Persian Gulf has analysts speculating that President Bush means to stop Tehran's nuclear ambitions by force if necessary.

The USS John C. Stennis was scheduled to sail Tuesday from its homeport of
Bremerton, Washington. When the second carrrier arrives in the Middle East next month, this will be the first time since the U.S.-led Iraq invasion in 2003 that the United States will have two carrier battle groups in the region, according to a U.S. Navy official.

The increase in U.S. forces is a show of strength by Washington in the face of Iran's growing regional assertiveness and a perception among U.S. adversaries that the United States is vulnerable in Iraq, U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates said Monday.
Here's a link to more of the same article, but it says we have thirty
(30) days till the USS Stennis gets on station.

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/news.php3?id=119590


At least that's after the playoffs, super bowl and the pro bowl.
They can do anything they want after that ...
__________________

Last edited by geetrue; 01-16-07 at 08:18 PM.
geetrue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-07, 02:19 PM   #2
Gizzmoe
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,668
Downloads: 4
Uploads: 0
Default

geetrue, please check your PM.
Gizzmoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-07, 02:30 PM   #3
mr chris
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Herefordshire, England
Posts: 3,562
Downloads: 216
Uploads: 0
Default

Very intresting indeed. :hmm::hmm:
__________________
mr chris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-07, 02:31 PM   #4
TteFAboB
Admiral
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,247
Downloads: 4
Uploads: 0
Default

http://history1900s.about.com/librar...lywwiip185.htm

http://history1900s.about.com/librar.../blywwiip2.htm

http://www.loudfrog.com/itemdetail.aspx?detailID=62513

http://www.library.northwestern.edu/.../ww0207-82.jpg

Power Projection. Ahmadinejad is like a Barbary pirate. Show strength, they cower and comply. Show weakness and they leap forward out of their toothpick castles. Draw the line, watch him shake his legs and pee himself.
__________________
"Tout ce qui est exagéré est insignifiant." ("All that is exaggerated is insignificant.") - Talleyrand
TteFAboB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-07, 05:50 AM   #5
mapuc
CINC Pacific Fleet
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Denmark
Posts: 20,537
Downloads: 37
Uploads: 0


Default

I wonder if The US has come to the same conclusion as I have.

Peace In the middle east? then erase Syria and Iran and put a stronghold on Saudia-Arabia, Egypt and Jemen.

Markus
mapuc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-07, 05:58 AM   #6
U-533
Samurai Navy
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: On my Boat
Posts: 594
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mapuc
I wonder if The US has come to the same conclusion as I have.

Peace In the middle east? then erase Syria and Iran and put a stronghold on Saudia-Arabia, Egypt and Jemen.

Markus
Probably not... we got certain folks over here whining and starting all kinds of peace marches ...60's stuff

I think soon we will cave in and let the terrorist have their way.
Yes I said TERRORIST... what else would you call a Muslim country with Nukes?
U-533 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-07, 07:02 AM   #7
Melonfish
XO
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Warrington, UK
Posts: 417
Downloads: 106
Uploads: 0
Default

hmmm. you know i jumped to this conclusion myself after reading that the yanks have sent another carrier to the middle east...
i think somethings going on but we'll have to wait and see if something happens.
if it does i think it'll be conventional weapons v's irans enrichment sites. better that then israel nuking them with dirty bombs.
pete
Melonfish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-07, 07:14 AM   #8
Fish
Eternal Patrol
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 1,923
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

They claim a drone shot down.

http://www.thememriblog.org/
Fish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-07, 04:06 PM   #9
Seth8530
Captain
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 546
Downloads: 17
Uploads: 0
Default

A very intersting thought indeed. I belive if are to attack them we should do it soon.
Alsoo could the extra 20,000 troops be for Iran. Time will tell.
__________________
Seth8530 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-07, 04:16 PM   #10
Enigma
The Old Man
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: At comms depth, obviously.
Posts: 1,476
Downloads: 7
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Alsoo could the extra 20,000 troops be for Iran. Time will tell.
I have to say, this would be political suicide, not to mention our final osticizing from the world community. Besides that, 20'000 plus what we have there now is not near enough to take on Iran. The only way they could pull that off is be lying to the American people and the world about why the troops are there, and we both know the President doesnt lie or mislead.
__________________

"Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it." -Mark Twain
Enigma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-07, 04:17 PM   #11
Seth8530
Captain
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 546
Downloads: 17
Uploads: 0
Default

Rofl do i detect humour. But it is true that that is political suiside. I sopose you are correct.
__________________
Seth8530 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-07, 06:14 PM   #12
baggygreen
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Canberra, ACT, Down Under (really On Top)
Posts: 1,880
Downloads: 7
Uploads: 0
Default

To use 20,000 troops in iran is to sign a death warrant for each and every one. To invade Iran would involve a multinational effort much like the first gulf war. The troops are going there to fight the insurgency, probably mainly to reinforce massive sweeps across suburbs.

Iran will be taken down a notch (if anyone in the US leadership has the brains) by airstrikes.
baggygreen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-07, 01:31 AM   #13
Chaotic42
Torpedoman
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Mississippi Gulf Coast, USA
Posts: 113
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by baggygreen
To use 20,000 troops in iran is to sign a death warrant for each and every one. To invade Iran would involve a multinational effort much like the first gulf war. The troops are going there to fight the insurgency, probably mainly to reinforce massive sweeps across suburbs.

Iran will be taken down a notch (if anyone in the US leadership has the brains) by airstrikes.
Well, the problem is that Europe wouldn't do anything substantial until the Iranian border runs through Paris. I can't forsee Europe ever contributing substantially to an attack on Iran.
__________________
Complex numbers are all fun and games until someone loses an i.
Chaotic42 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.