![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]()
Seriously.
I can understand sites having cookies, like subsim so I don't have to type in my password everytime, but why is it I go to a site eg a news site and everyone under the sun wants to set a cookie? I reject most btw. I mean why does some site have to try and set a cookie that won't expire until 2038? I know google tries to and does, and I know they use the information that in many way I feel is none of their business. It bugs the hell out of me and I sure wish I could find a legal challenge to cookies. One more question. If someone has their web browser set to allow cookies, ie a novice who takes vanilla settings, is the loading of cookies without warning them not illegal? Or is it like junk mail, nothing you can do about it? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |||||
Sonar Guy
![]() Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Montréal
Posts: 399
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
![]() Quote:
|
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Midwest - USA
Posts: 1,057
Downloads: 42
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I am not sure that you have any legal standing.
No. Wait. I'm wrong. You don't have any legal standing. I'd argue this in front of any judge based on: 1. Surfing the internet is a voluntary activity. 2. You have no identifiable damages, and therefore any claim for damages. 3. When you visit a website, you allow that site to put a cookie up, basically, by visiting. 4. Nothing is 'illegal' until a governing body says that it is so, and last I checked, Congress has not passed, and the President has not signed, any bill making it illegal to put a little thinginy in your Internet files tracking your presence on websites. 5. There isn't, despite what Justice Brennan liked to think, a right to privacy that exists in the penumbras of the Constitution, and hopefully the ones that he penciled in will dissappear before long. 6. The Constitiution does not protect people from each other, only from the government itself. 7. The long standing principal, caveat emptor, still exists, and I think should, when it comes to surfing the internet. This certainly, isn't very deep legal thinking, but must the judges I know would buy into it, I believe..... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|