SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-22-06, 03:41 PM   #1
SUBMAN1
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,866
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default First CV-22 Ospery delivered to the USAF

I'll post the whole article since military pages can't be copywrited.

-S
Quote:
Air Force welcomes arrival of first combat-configured CV-22 Osprey



by James Darcy
V-22 Osprey Joint Program Office

3/3/2006 - AMARILLO, Texas --
Air Force leadership accepted the keys for the first combat-configured CV-22 Osprey from Bell Boeing Wednesday in a ceremony at the Bell manufacturing facility in Amarillo, Texas.

While earlier versions of the CV-22 tiltrotor aircraft are in use as test assets, this is the first of the "Block B/10" aircraft, representing the configuration that the Air Force Special Operations Command will take into combat in 2009.

Senior Department of Defense leaders taking part in the ceremony included Army Gen. Doug Brown, commander of U.S. Special Operations Command; Air Force Lt. Gen. John L. Hudson, commander of Aeronautical Systems Center; and Air Force Maj. Gen. Donald Wurster, vice commander of AFSOC. The man to receive the keys to the aircraft, however, was Air Force Lt. Col. Jim Cardoso, commanding officer of the 71st Special Operations Squadron, which will get this Osprey to support aircrew training at Kirtland Air Force Base, N.M.

The Air Force will purchase 50 CV-22s for long-range infiltration, exfiltration and re-supply of special operations forces in hostile or denied territory. The Osprey provides twice the speed, up to five times the range and significantly enhanced survivability over other conventional rotary wing platforms.

At the same time, it retains the operational flexibility of a helicopter, with the ability to take off and land vertically, and insert troops via "fast rope" capability onto rooftops or decks of ships.

"This aircraft is the single most significant transformation of Air Force Special Operations since the introduction of the helicopter," said General Wurster. "Nearly every mission we have faced in the last 20 years could have been done better and faster with the V-22."

General Wurster also spoke of the positive impact the aircraft would have on protecting troops in Afghanistan and Iraq today.

"Our ability to move point to point by air, over extended distances at high speed, would reduce our exposure to the roadside attacks" that are responsible for so many casualties, he said.

The CV-22 is about 85 percent common with the MV-22 Osprey that the Marine Corps will deploy with in 2007, but possesses a number of additional capabilities tailored to the demands of its unique mission.

A multi-mode radar with terrain following/terrain avoidance modes allows aggressive, terrain-masking ingress routes to be flown safely under cover of darkness. The suite of integrated radio-frequency countermeasures and the directed infrared countermeasures systems detect and defeat radar-guided and heat-seeking missiles, respectively. The CV-22 also has additional internal fuel capacity and enhanced navigation systems, communications and avionics gear when compared to the MV-22.

"This gives us global reach," General Brown said of the CV-22. "We can reach out and touch bad guys wherever they live around the world."

On Feb. 24, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld rode in the jump seat of an MV-22 Osprey on a short flight from Marine Corps Air Station New River, N.C., to Camp Lejeune, N.C. The Defense Department approved full rate production of the Osprey in September 2005, following successful completion of an operational evaluation in which the Osprey demonstrated all the key performance parameters for the Marine Corps mission. Additional operational test will begin later this year for those systems and mission profiles unique to the CV-22.

General Brown said his troops would like to have the aircraft in theater today. "I never go to visit them without getting the question, 'When are we going to get the CV-22?'" he said.

Positive feedback has also come from operators fresh from the field during recent trials with the aircraft at Naval Air Station Patuxent River, Md.

"I spent the summer of 2004 in Afghanistan and led 22 direct-action air assaults," said one Navy SEAL team leader who asked not to be identified. "Coming in on the helos, the enemy would hear us when we were still [minutes] out. That was time they had to flee or to get ready to shoot at us. With the Osprey, my experience has been that you don't hear it until it's already over your head."

General Brown acknowledged that it has been a long road to get the V-22 from earlier designs to a mature technology that's ready for war.

"This is not the same aircraft that was flying six years ago," said Marine Corps Col. Bill Taylor, head of the V-22 Joint Program Office. "Both the aircraft and the program have been reengineered, and more than ten thousand flight hours over the last three-and-a-half years have validated those changes. And we will continue to make improvements for as long as this aircraft is in the inventory."

Tthe Marine Corps stood up the first operational V-22 squadron, VMM-263, at MCAS New River today. The Marines' MV-22 reaches initial operational capability, meaning it is ready to deploy for combat, in summer 2007, though the squadron will be airborne with its full complement of Ospreys at New River within the year. Initial operational capability for the Air Force's CV-22 follows in 2009.
http://www2.afsoc.af.mil/news/story....ryID=123016877
__________________

Last edited by Gizzmoe; 11-23-06 at 01:48 AM.
SUBMAN1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-06, 05:47 PM   #2
Der Eisen-Wal
Machinist's Mate
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 121
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

about time!

Last edited by Gizzmoe; 11-23-06 at 01:45 AM.
Der Eisen-Wal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-06, 06:37 PM   #3
bookworm_020
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sinking ships off the Australian coast
Posts: 5,966
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
Default

I daw articles about the ospery back in the early 90's. It took them over 14 years to get the bugs out it Heck!! How much money did they blow on it?

At least it wasn't as bad as the RAH-66!
bookworm_020 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-06, 07:13 PM   #4
Kazuaki Shimazaki II
Ace of the Deep
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,140
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
Default

From some reports, they hadn't really fixed all the bugs yet, and some shortcomings may not be solvable in principle. They are just shoving the darn thing out because as you said, it took over 14 years to get it to the present state. Try poking around in www.g2mil.com.
Kazuaki Shimazaki II is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-06, 10:01 PM   #5
bookworm_020
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sinking ships off the Australian coast
Posts: 5,966
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
Default

OUCH!!! 20 Billion Dollars!!! For an aircraft that can't cope with the mission it was designed for, and yet to enter active service after so many years of work on it.

I'm sure it could have bought a lot of new, better equiped heicopters.
bookworm_020 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-06, 10:48 AM   #6
AVGWarhawk
Lucky Jack
 
AVGWarhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: In a 1954 Buick.
Posts: 28,274
Downloads: 90
Uploads: 0


Default

This aircraft was a problem from the start and has crashed numerous times. I had thought and hoped it was scrapped. Oh well, I hope some more of the boys do not suffer a crash.
__________________
“You're painfully alive in a drugged and dying culture.”
― Richard Yates, Revolutionary Road
AVGWarhawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-06, 01:24 PM   #7
TteFAboB
Admiral
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,247
Downloads: 4
Uploads: 0
Default

Can it fly, like a plane, on a single engine? I've always thought of this thing as a deathtrap though it was fun flying it in those ancient DOS simulators. Make it unmanned, reduce the size/scale. That's it for my expert's advice.
__________________
"Tout ce qui est exagéré est insignifiant." ("All that is exaggerated is insignificant.") - Talleyrand
TteFAboB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-06, 01:46 PM   #8
tycho102
Ace of the Deep
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,100
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TteFAboB
Can it fly, like a plane, on a single engine?
I'd imagine it can, but it would take some serious yaw.

This is a decent platform for the specwar guys, and I don't know if they've got all the bugs worked out of the avionics just yet. Hope for the best, but I'm expecting there to be some more high profile crashes.
tycho102 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-06, 01:57 PM   #9
NeonSamurai
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Socialist Republic of Kanadia
Posts: 3,044
Downloads: 25
Uploads: 0


Default

I think it can, the problem would be landing it though, with the yaw effects, plus im not sure, but is it even capable of landing as a normal aircraft due to the size of the blades?
NeonSamurai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-06, 05:22 PM   #10
PeriscopeDepth
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 1,894
Downloads: 6
Uploads: 0
Default

I know it can't land with the props full forward (the props are too large), but perhaps tilted it can pull off an airplane like landing? I'm fairly sure it takes off like that regularly.

PD

Last edited by PeriscopeDepth; 11-24-06 at 05:32 PM.
PeriscopeDepth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-06, 08:34 PM   #11
Tchocky
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,874
Downloads: 6
Uploads: 0
Default

those things have keys?

Oh, and they seemed fairly effective in kicking my ass in Half-life....
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Tchocky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-06, 11:07 AM   #12
TteFAboB
Admiral
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,247
Downloads: 4
Uploads: 0
Default

:rotfl: Sounds good:

__________________
"Tout ce qui est exagéré est insignifiant." ("All that is exaggerated is insignificant.") - Talleyrand
TteFAboB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-06, 04:32 PM   #13
Godalmighty83
Sonar Guy
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 398
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TteFAboB
:rotfl: Sounds good:


i was thinking more along the lines of those a-10 warthogs they have plans on retiring, will they need there engines sat in the graveyard? just one for each osprey gaffa taped down on top.
__________________
Were there monkeys? Some terrifying space monkeys maybe got loose?
Godalmighty83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-06, 01:37 PM   #14
SUBMAN1
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,866
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Godalmighty83
Quote:
Originally Posted by TteFAboB
:rotfl: Sounds good:


i was thinking more along the lines of those a-10 warthogs they have plans on retiring, will they need there engines sat in the graveyard? just one for each osprey gaffa taped down on top.
The A-10 will never be retired - Its already been on the chopping block 10 times before, but its just too useful!

-S
__________________
SUBMAN1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-06, 02:02 PM   #15
NeonSamurai
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Socialist Republic of Kanadia
Posts: 3,044
Downloads: 25
Uploads: 0


Default

And more importantly they dont have a plane yet that can do it better.
NeonSamurai is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.