SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Silent Hunter 3 - 4 - 5 > Silent Hunter 5
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-28-10, 09:57 AM   #61
HundertzehnGustav
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lux, betw. G, B and F
Posts: 1,898
Downloads: 66
Uploads: 0
Default

Unfinished product, why rely on unpaid modders, yaddy ya yaddy ya

wich means ignore all problems SHV has?
(--> not to mention their DRM)

why start this thread and ask for opinions?
if Unfinished product, why rely on unpaid modders, yaddy ya yaddy ya is no deal breaker, then tell me:

what is?


(--> not to mention their DRM)

and i honestly ask that question.

The way the question s phrased, everything bad about SHV (Unfinished product, why rely on unpaid modders, yaddy ya yaddy ya) can not be named as a "deal breaker".

I find it funny...
if

Unfinished product, why rely on unpaid modders, yaddy ya yaddy ya

is no deal breaker... then maybe it is time to wake up for some people?

ela-ali-baba is making relatively good money, and his team as well.IMO...
instead of collectinbg welfare checks.

------------------------

I see what the OP is trying to achieve: he is trying to draw a list of things the community needs to work on, he has a positive "pro-work", "lets-get-it-done" attitude. Focus on the future, stop the ranting about the past.
Still, i shake my head and refuse to buy a product as deeply flawed as this one.
__________________
In conclusion: SH3 is the shizzle, yo. -Frau Kaleun
Another negative about using your deck gun is that you are definately DETECTED, which has long term effects on your relationship with aircraft. -snestorm
HundertzehnGustav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-10, 10:03 AM   #62
robbo180265
Admiral
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Brighton, England.Party capital of the south
Posts: 2,255
Downloads: 126
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HundertzehnGustav View Post


I see what the OP is trying to achieve: he is trying to draw a list of things the community needs to work on, he has a positive "pro-work", "lets-get-it-done" attitude. Focus on the future, stop the ranting about the past.
Still, i shake my head and refuse to buy a product as deeply flawed as this one.
He's trying to get a reasoned debate going about issues ingame, he's trying to do this without the usual trolling

You've somehow missed that point
robbo180265 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-10, 10:15 AM   #63
tommyk
Watch Officer
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Near U-995 (Kiel, Germany)
Posts: 337
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
Default

> Are there any real deal breakers in SH5 ?

For me the answer is simple: all of it...

DRM, Bugs & Game-Design are not what I will spend my money on...

too much WoW: Bring me 12 spromkis, no wait, sink me 500 ships
__________________
Gute Jagd und fette Beute!
tommyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-10, 10:20 AM   #64
HundertzehnGustav
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lux, betw. G, B and F
Posts: 1,898
Downloads: 66
Uploads: 0
Default

No... i did NOT miss that.0 I understood. proof:

"i see what OP is trying to achieve:..."

no matter, thanks for telling lme i am trolling (and by definition, am a troll)

o put it more harshly:
the OP is blind as hell, and the community has gotten the shaft up their collective arses this time.

and yet they (okay... the OP) are/is trying to stay positive... stop the bleeding.

That is a situation where i would avise "seeing someone" or "taking legal action" instead of "licking its own wounds". Yum.



or if it is indeed "licking its own wounds"... then even the question is useless:
-Players have pointed out the problems, and keep doing so all the time
-Ubi is still releaseing minor updates (i guess?)
-the problems listed must be modded
-there is a mods section.


Bottom line:
even the OP question( i applaude your positive attitude, Sir)
no matter how good its intention is
  • is Flawed (can not list the fundamental problems)
  • useless (there is bug reporting and modding/fixing going on next door)
at the same time.
So why ask the question?

Forgive me my rather black and white way of seeing things... This time around, i see no real way to do otherwise.
__________________
In conclusion: SH3 is the shizzle, yo. -Frau Kaleun
Another negative about using your deck gun is that you are definately DETECTED, which has long term effects on your relationship with aircraft. -snestorm

Last edited by HundertzehnGustav; 03-28-10 at 10:30 AM.
HundertzehnGustav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-10, 11:20 AM   #65
robbo180265
Admiral
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Brighton, England.Party capital of the south
Posts: 2,255
Downloads: 126
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HundertzehnGustav View Post
No... i did NOT miss that.0 I understood. proof:

"i see what OP is trying to achieve:..."

no matter, thanks for telling lme i am trolling (and by definition, am a troll)

o put it more harshly:
the OP is blind as hell, and the community has gotten the shaft up their collective arses this time.

and yet they (okay... the OP) are/is trying to stay positive... stop the bleeding.

That is a situation where i would avise "seeing someone" or "taking legal action" instead of "licking its own wounds". Yum.



or if it is indeed "licking its own wounds"... then even the question is useless:
-Players have pointed out the problems, and keep doing so all the time
-Ubi is still releaseing minor updates (i guess?)
-the problems listed must be modded
-there is a mods section.


Bottom line:
even the OP question( i applaude your positive attitude, Sir)
no matter how good its intention is
  • is Flawed (can not list the fundamental problems)
  • useless (there is bug reporting and modding/fixing going on next door)
at the same time.
So why ask the question?

Forgive me my rather black and white way of seeing things... This time around, i see no real way to do otherwise.
Sorry didn't see you reply right away. I was too busy playing my bugged and broken unplayable game (and enjoying playing it too)

I think the point you are missing (still) is that the game needs work , no-one can deny that. But most of us who actually own the game are still enjoying playing it.

I'll go back to my bugged game now
robbo180265 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-10, 12:23 PM   #66
janh
Stinking drunk in Trinidad
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 349
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by robbo180265 View Post
Sorry didn't see you reply right away. I was too busy playing my bugged and broken unplayable game (and enjoying playing it too)

I think the point you are missing (still) is that the game needs work , no-one can deny that. But most of us who actually own the game are still enjoying playing it.

I'll go back to my bugged game now
And that's why I still am hopeful that it will be a worthy sequel to SHIII one day. And why I keep checking the forum for a "big announcement"...
__________________
Scientific facts are not determined by the opinion of the majority, nor by a democratic vote.
janh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-10, 12:46 PM   #67
mookiemookie
Navy Seal
 
mookiemookie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 9,404
Downloads: 105
Uploads: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HundertzehnGustav View Post
No... i did NOT miss that.0 I understood.
No, you're still missing the point. This thread isn't about what you're going on about. You can have your opinion, but the topic of this thread isn't about what you're opining on. It's poor forum etiquette to disregard a thread's topic and hijack it with your own subject.
__________________
They don’t think it be like it is, but it do.

Want more U-boat Kaleun portraits for your SH3 Commander Profiles? Download the SH3 Commander Portrait Pack here.
mookiemookie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-10, 01:34 PM   #68
HundertzehnGustav
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lux, betw. G, B and F
Posts: 1,898
Downloads: 66
Uploads: 0
Default

Sooo okay?

i re-red the first post, wich defines what this thread is about.
Hmm.
what are the deal breakers? what prevents people like me to buy the game?

Quite a bit of deal breakers here imo...

Disregard the half product, disregard the Ubi bashing, disregard the yadda yadda...

There are no more Deal breakers any more...?

The first post gives me a question to answer.

What are the Deal breakers?

My answer is:

The way the first post is worded, the way my answers are limited, i am "pushed" to admit that the game is good, has no problems and works as advertized. That is has no deal breakers, because the actual deal breakers are banned from the answer list.

A) that aint my opinion
B) that aint other peoples opinion
C) the question sugests an answer to the user reading said question.
D) that leaves no room for discussion

and also included in my answer is:
why ask such a question if there are no possible deal breakers? sort of "WTF!? " spontaneous reaction.

Does that make me a Troll?



cooool.
__________________
In conclusion: SH3 is the shizzle, yo. -Frau Kaleun
Another negative about using your deck gun is that you are definately DETECTED, which has long term effects on your relationship with aircraft. -snestorm
HundertzehnGustav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-10, 01:45 PM   #69
Heretic
Commodore
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 617
Downloads: 240
Uploads: 2


Default

Some people's mountains are other people's molehills and verse visa.

It's subjective.
Heretic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-10, 01:51 PM   #70
HundertzehnGustav
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lux, betw. G, B and F
Posts: 1,898
Downloads: 66
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by horsa View Post
SH5 was a train crash. Right ?

Morale was broken.
too many unnecessary changes to the UI,
very little information on what to do or how to do it ,
character dialogue tediously limited
lack of sub damage control
and so on ....

But hey . Wait. What is really missing ?
A lot of stuff is in there but either underdeveloped (like the character dialogue) or inexplicably hidden away (like compass and 'depth under keel'). All moddable.

Forget the ethics for a moment ( Ubi sucks, unfinished product, why rely on unpaid modders, yaddy ya yaddy ya ......) .
What features are really missing or annoyingly obtrusive. So much so that they are real deal breakers for you? Things that should be in (or not in), which no amount of modding can put right ( like the red triangle in SH2).

Which are the real deal breakers of SH5 ????
so let me play the game...

  • AI of all kind do not use torpedoes
Planes, DDs, Torpedo Boats, Schnellboats, Submarines...
no progress in 5 years since shIII

  • Wolfpacks
clearly a interaction with BDU/CFlottilla command/inter-uboot operations and communication is needed and was desired.
Nobody seems to have listened
  • Substandard
The Supermods of 2008 and 2009 have set the standard to a modern Uboat game.
Units, functions, Weaponry,
variations in ship liveries, ship types,
Radio messages,
User interfaces,
Sounds
AI routines
documentation

are still well below what supermods of SHIII era offer.

I expect a new product to at least "take a look" at what the community implemented over the last...3?4?5? years, and "read" their wishlists.
I expect that a devteam, because the persons are the same ones, to be smart and open their eyes.

Until shortly before release i believed the creators of the game to build on things like GWX or LSH. It was only few months before Day X that we were offered info about the re-definition of the series, primarily based on systems, to aim for a more personal approach.

Such is clearly not the case. No SHIII 2.0? No Money from me. Broken Deal.

...just 3 things off the top of my head, and not in the "ubi bashing, half game, modders needed category".

My opinion valid now?
__________________
In conclusion: SH3 is the shizzle, yo. -Frau Kaleun
Another negative about using your deck gun is that you are definately DETECTED, which has long term effects on your relationship with aircraft. -snestorm
HundertzehnGustav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-10, 01:57 PM   #71
Méo
Ace of the Deep
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Quebec City
Posts: 1,153
Downloads: 258
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HundertzehnGustav View Post
Sooo okay?
The way I see it, it's quite simple, the OP is looking for ''big features'' that are currently missing (i.e. wolfpacks, type IX, 1944-1945, etc.) and not details and bugs that are underdeveloped or unfinished.

For me I would say wolfpacks (I know there are some files about it in the game, but for the moment, they are missing).

But I'm not saying it's a deal breaker until the game gets more polished.

----

btw, EVERYBODY here knows the DRM thing is a deal breaker for some people, so it's nothing new.
Méo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-10, 02:00 PM   #72
horsa
Pacific Aces Dev Team
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Halifax, England
Posts: 502
Downloads: 44
Uploads: 3


Default

Quote:
The way the first post is worded, the way my answers are limited, i am "pushed" to admit that the game is good, has no problems and works as advertized. That is has no deal breakers, because the actual deal breakers are banned from the answer list.
Not true. Even after the question "forces" you to ditch your main complaint, SH5 still has issues. Some of these may be real deal breakers. That is important because it means that, as a a game, it is indeed a complete turkey.

The question remains open.

( added before your latest post 70)
__________________
"You need to put your behind in the past". Kumba

Last edited by horsa; 03-28-10 at 06:54 PM. Reason: clarification to simultaneous posting
horsa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-10, 02:07 PM   #73
horsa
Pacific Aces Dev Team
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Halifax, England
Posts: 502
Downloads: 44
Uploads: 3


Default

Quote:
.just 3 things off the top of my head, and not in the "ubi bashing, half game, modders needed category".

My opinion valid now?
Yes. Now we can work with that
__________________
"You need to put your behind in the past". Kumba
horsa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-10, 02:09 PM   #74
HundertzehnGustav
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lux, betw. G, B and F
Posts: 1,898
Downloads: 66
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Méo View Post
The way I see it, it's quite simple, the OP is looking for ''big features'' that are currently missing (i.e. wolfpacks, type IX, 1944-1945, etc.) and not details and bugs that are underdeveloped or unfinished.
Okay... but then the missing years and content are not valid... (half finished product)

If i must leave out the underddevelopped stuff... i have NO answers because "underdevelopped" has such a broad meaning.
Hard call!

Wolfpacks are underdevelopped too... they are missing!
-->Wolfpacs are Missing... the game aint finished (half product)

AI using torpedoes is underdevelopped too... they just do not have any!
-->AI do not have torpedoes... the game aint finished (half product)

Horsa, dude, you are asking an impossible-to-answer question.
and that kind of ticks me off, because its a really interesting one to wich i would like to see a few good answers.

What about you show me your line of thinking by answering your own question? I just do not seem to get it.
__________________
In conclusion: SH3 is the shizzle, yo. -Frau Kaleun
Another negative about using your deck gun is that you are definately DETECTED, which has long term effects on your relationship with aircraft. -snestorm
HundertzehnGustav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-10, 02:15 PM   #75
EAF274 Johan
Ensign
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Gent, Belgium
Posts: 228
Downloads: 94
Uploads: 0
Default

I'll have a go. I do not have much knowledge of the true modding potential of SH5. I know it's supposed to be big, but just how big I have no clue. So forgive me if some of my game breakers can be modded.

- Weather, AI damage, map markings not saved in Save games
- Intrusive "synchronising" messages even when I have this option turned off
- No Kriegsmarine grid or other detailed coordinates system (degrees in latitude/longitude is not enough)
- Lack of crew animation (not expecting them to run forward during crash dive, but at least I expect to see them cringe when under attack and see them work at repairs like in SH4)
- Lack of detail in the damage system
- No blind spot in hydrophones
- Abrupt patrol endings when macro-mission objectives are fulfilled
- Lack of interaction with BdU via radio
[EDIT: 2 more]
- Immortal officers and no detailed crew management like in SH3/4
- Colliding ships in ports

Given the fact that these features were present in SH3/4 or these issues did not exist (apart from the savegame issue - you'd expect they had fixed that by now), I can only find SH5 to be a step back from its predecessors.

Apart from that, not having a Type II is also a major disappointment for me. I know this can probably be modded in, but who knows how long that will take.
__________________
Rock 'n' roll is the only religion that will never let you down

Last edited by EAF274 Johan; 03-28-10 at 02:35 PM.
EAF274 Johan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.