SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-18-10, 12:44 AM   #31
GoldenRivet
Subsim Aviator
 
GoldenRivet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 8,726
Downloads: 146
Uploads: 0


Default

Its all part of a master plan to turn the oil industry into the new tobacco.

Obama is one of the more hated people in America... and he is milking all of this event for every drop so he can divert attention away from himself and onto BP.

one fact is for sure, the US Government has grown too massive, and is made up of way too many committees and organizations and pet projects - so many so that it is in effect, totally useless.

I didnt say i had all the answers there Budda... however, the fact remains that this has been a media bitching fest between Obama and BP, and though there are token efforts being made we really need to involve all the major experts in this instead of sending some go-green, tree hugging, hippie lab coated brainiac down there just so he can shrug his shoulders.

One idea im all for is submerging a massive non-nuclear depth charge to the source of the spill, then detonating it. Petroleum experts i have spoken with personally claim that there is a fair chance the thing will collapse in on itself, and the cave in could close off the flow. They have further pointed out various risks with such an activity, but share the opinion "This is already bad and getting worse... the time to do something was 3 weeks ago."

so far... thats what im in favor of. it beats the hell out of just driving a bunch of boats around in this muck and dolling out reparations to the victims (which usually comes after the smoke has settled... not while the fire is raging)

but, when it comes to petroleum, im just a lay-person. yet -I have heard more ideas circulated around my office water cooler at work from engineers I associate with than i have heard of on the news.
__________________
GoldenRivet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-10, 01:09 AM   #32
Tribesman
Stowaway
 
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
Default

Quote:
Perhaps we need to give this president a pack of smokes, a particular brand of malt liquor and sumthin' to poke on before he can function on any sort of decision making capacity.
Thats a nice follow up to your picture of a monkey.

Quote:
Its all part of a master plan to turn the oil industry into the new tobacco.
Its a conspiracy I tell ya.

Quote:
Obama is one of the more hated people in America
Just like Bush was...I guess it goes with the job

Quote:
One idea im all for is submerging a massive non-nuclear depth charge to the source of the spill, then detonating it. Petroleum experts i have spoken with personally claim that there is a fair chance the thing will collapse in on itself,
Isn't that an idea the dumb "lab coats" who don't know nuffin about oil discussed when they came down to consult with the experts several weeks ago.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-10, 10:12 PM   #33
Buddahaid
Shark above Space Chicken
 
Buddahaid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 9,332
Downloads: 162
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoldenRivet View Post
Its all part of a master plan to turn the oil industry into the new tobacco.

Obama is one of the more hated people in America... and he is milking all of this event for every drop so he can divert attention away from himself and onto BP.

one fact is for sure, the US Government has grown too massive, and is made up of way too many committees and organizations and pet projects - so many so that it is in effect, totally useless.

I didnt say i had all the answers there Budda... however, the fact remains that this has been a media bitching fest between Obama and BP, and though there are token efforts being made we really need to involve all the major experts in this instead of sending some go-green, tree hugging, hippie lab coated brainiac down there just so he can shrug his shoulders.

One idea im all for is submerging a massive non-nuclear depth charge to the source of the spill, then detonating it. Petroleum experts i have spoken with personally claim that there is a fair chance the thing will collapse in on itself, and the cave in could close off the flow. They have further pointed out various risks with such an activity, but share the opinion "This is already bad and getting worse... the time to do something was 3 weeks ago."

so far... thats what im in favor of. it beats the hell out of just driving a bunch of boats around in this muck and dolling out reparations to the victims (which usually comes after the smoke has settled... not while the fire is raging)

but, when it comes to petroleum, im just a lay-person. yet -I have heard more ideas circulated around my office water cooler at work from engineers I associate with than i have heard of on the news.
I fear that big bang solution even more than the current muddle. It may collapse ans seal it, but it also may just open a bigger hole. Too much uncertainty for my peace of mind and glad I'm not in the big chair.

What this really points out is we aren't smart enough to safely extract oil from these locations yet.
__________________
https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img924/4962/oeBHq3.jpg
"However vast the darkness, we must provide our own light."
Stanley Kubrick

"Tomorrow belongs to those who can hear it coming."
David Bowie
Buddahaid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-10, 11:00 PM   #34
krashkart
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 5,292
Downloads: 100
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buddahaid View Post
I fear that big bang solution even more than the current muddle. It may collapse ans seal it, but it also may just open a bigger hole. Too much uncertainty for my peace of mind and glad I'm not in the big chair.
That's kinda what I was thinking, too, and it has been discussed (regarding a nuclear device) in another thread with the same risk pointed out. Hammers tend to break things pretty easily if not finessed.


Quote:
What this really points out is we aren't smart enough to safely extract oil from these locations yet.
Hard to disagree with you there.
__________________
sent from my fingertips using a cheap keyboard
krashkart is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.