Keep your dissent to yourself !

SteamWake · 04-24-09, 09:55 AM

Democrats refuse to hear skeptics at congressional hearing on gorbal warming.

http://www.climatedepot.com/a/429/Re...sional-Hearing

Platapus · 04-24-09, 10:02 AM

Ok that's one man's interpretation. Do we have any facts that the evil Democrats are hatching up equally evil plans to suppress dissent?

Every paragraph is just

Quote:

Christopher Monckton claimed...

Quote:

Monckton told

Quote:

According to Monckton

Quote:

Monckton said

Quote:

Monckton explained

This is only his opinion/perception. Don't confuse opinion with facts.

Here is a hint: Anytime an "scientist" uses the phrase "chickened out" in an argument, their credibility takes a dip.

Tchocky · 04-24-09, 10:17 AM

Monckton is a joke.

AVGWarhawk · 04-24-09, 12:32 PM

Is Gore a scientist? What qualifies Gore then?

mr chris · 04-24-09, 12:35 PM

Whoa i surprised you guys trust anyone these days to tell you the truth. Least of all political party's and there followers.
I would not trust any politician as far a i could throw the tosser.

AVGWarhawk · 04-24-09, 12:39 PM

Quote:

This is only his opinion/perception. Don't confuse opinion with facts.

Here is a hint: Anytime an "scientist" uses the phrase "chickened out" in an argument, their credibility takes a dip.

Well here is a hint...Gore is a stuffed shirt retired VP. He is about as qualified as me in global warming matters. Yet, most here have thrown Monckton under the bus and for what, an opinion. If that is the case, both Gore and Monckton are nothing but opinions looking to debate.

Jimbuna · 04-24-09, 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mr chris

Whoa i surprised you guys trust anyone these days to tell you the truth. Least of all political party's and there followers.
I would not trust any politician as far a i could throw the tosser.

They're still a young country Chris....give em time and they'll learn, the hard way like we did

Spike88 · 04-25-09, 11:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AVGWarhawk

Is Gore a scientist? What qualifies Gore then?

The fact he invented the Internet.

Enigma · 04-26-09, 12:43 AM

Quote:

Quote:
Originally Posted by SUBMAN1

Of course he could. Problem is now, that would be free will to you now wouldn't it?

Now there you have a good point.

Aramike · 04-24-09, 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Platapus

Ok that's one man's interpretation. Do we have any facts that the evil Democrats are hatching up equally evil plans to suppress dissent?

Every paragraph is just

This is only his opinion/perception. Don't confuse opinion with facts.

Here is a hint: Anytime an "scientist" uses the phrase "chickened out" in an argument, their credibility takes a dip.

Your quotes merely illustrate the bias and style of the author and has nothing to do with the source.

Besides, why shouldn't his opinions be listened to any more than Al Gore's? The "science" is hardly conclusive and represents a concensus moreso than experimental verification.

SteamWake · 04-24-09, 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aramike

Your quotes merely illustrate the bias and style of the author and has nothing to do with the source.

Besides, why shouldn't his opinions be listened to any more than Al Gore's? The "science" is hardly conclusive and represents a concensus moreso than experimental verification.

What concensus?

Its more like a religion than a scientific process if anything.

Aramike · 04-24-09, 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteamWake

What concensus?

Its more like a religion than a scientific process if anything.

It IS a concensus.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consens...ge_controversy

A concensus doesn't mean everyone agrees - it means that there is a large amount of agreement on a theory that is not verifiable.

Frankly, throughout history scientific concensus and religion have been fairly interchangable.

Rip · 04-24-09, 06:12 PM

Scientific process would usually call for parsimony or Occam's Razor be used with trying to suggest a theory or hypothesis should be considered scientific fact (which of course is less than total fact which essentially doesn't exist or at least is unknowable for mere humans). If congress is going to hear from aomeone with NO scientific training ie Al Gore should at least be willing to listen to an opposing view from an actual scientist. Of course we all know it is just a sideshow anyway. They don't care about the truth, just acting for the cameras.

04-24-09, 09:55 AM	#1
SteamWake Rear Admiral Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 13,224 Downloads: 5 Uploads: 0	Keep your dissent to yourself ! Democrats refuse to hear skeptics at congressional hearing on gorbal warming. http://www.climatedepot.com/a/429/Re...sional-Hearing __________________ Follow the progress of Mr. Mulligan : http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=147648

04-24-09, 10:17 AM	#3
Tchocky Navy Seal Join Date: Jul 2004 Posts: 5,874 Downloads: 6 Uploads: 0	Monckton is a joke. __________________ [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

04-24-09, 12:32 PM	#4
AVGWarhawk Lucky Jack Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: In a 1954 Buick. Posts: 28,253 Downloads: 90 Uploads: 0	Is Gore a scientist? What qualifies Gore then? __________________ “You're painfully alive in a drugged and dying culture.” ― Richard Yates, Revolutionary Road

04-24-09, 12:35 PM	#5
mr chris Silent Hunter Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Herefordshire, England Posts: 3,562 Downloads: 216 Uploads: 0	Whoa i surprised you guys trust anyone these days to tell you the truth. Least of all political party's and there followers. I would not trust any politician as far a i could throw the tosser. __________________

04-24-09, 06:12 PM	#13
Rip Commodore Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Right behind you! Posts: 643 Downloads: 39 Uploads: 0	Scientific process would usually call for parsimony or Occam's Razor be used with trying to suggest a theory or hypothesis should be considered scientific fact (which of course is less than total fact which essentially doesn't exist or at least is unknowable for mere humans). If congress is going to hear from aomeone with NO scientific training ie Al Gore should at least be willing to listen to an opposing view from an actual scientist. Of course we all know it is just a sideshow anyway. They don't care about the truth, just acting for the cameras.