SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Silent Hunter 3 - 4 - 5 > Silent Hunter 4: Wolves of the Pacific
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-20-15, 09:15 PM   #31
ColonelSandersLite
Captain
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 481
Downloads: 71
Uploads: 3
Default

Yeah, did some further research. The Japanese threw the E27 radar detector, often paired with the model 3 on everything from subs to carriers. The E27 was definitely capable of determining direction.

Might want to look here from page 333 to 335:
https://books.google.com/books?id=dP...ceiver&f=false


Historical facts aside. Every sensor is directional in the game whether it should be or not. For example, the SD radar is not directional, but still gives bearing data. It's certainly just a game engine limitation.
__________________
My SH4 LP
ColonelSandersLite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-15, 09:58 PM   #32
TorpX
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,975
Downloads: 153
Uploads: 11
Default

Nice find there.

Very interesting.
TorpX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-15, 10:33 PM   #33
ColonelSandersLite
Captain
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 481
Downloads: 71
Uploads: 3
Default

Yeah, been reading some of that book preview. I *really* want a copy now. Sadly, it's price point puts it out of my range in the immediate sense. Maybe soon though.
__________________
My SH4 LP
ColonelSandersLite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-15, 12:46 PM   #34
Rockin Robbins
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: DeLand, FL
Posts: 8,899
Downloads: 135
Uploads: 52


Default

So a whole squadron of DDs and the Shinano, very likely all equipped with the E27 presumably detected Archerfish (we know they did that), determined the bearing to the submarine and purposely turned to travel perfectly in front of the submarine?

Something is wrong here. Knowing the bearing to the sub wouldn't they have turned away, knowing that they can do 20 knots in bad times and over 30 if they have to and the sub would have no way of getting off a shot? The Japanese account of the encounter makes no mention of having directional capability and what squadron would be more modern but the one guarding a ship so secret that the Navy didn't believe Enright's claim of sinking a carrier?

This smells like the secret weapons of the Luftwaffe, most of which were little more than pipe dreams and maybe a model or a prototype somewhere.

Last edited by Rockin Robbins; 08-21-15 at 12:52 PM.
Rockin Robbins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-15, 03:07 PM   #35
ColonelSandersLite
Captain
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 481
Downloads: 71
Uploads: 3
Default

I can see a few possible reasons for it.

First, bearing only plots are inaccurate and time consuming.

Secondly the archerfish failed the initial intercept. They deduced that shinano would return to original base course so archerfish changed course to intercept based on that. This would in effect ruin the shinanos estimation of archerfish's position. Leading to another inaccurate time consuming plot. It's not hard at all to imagine that shinano missestimated archerfish's position.

Third, shinano thought that archerfish was a diversion and the actual attack force was somewhere else. So which direction is actually safe?

Basically, the fog of war worked out in favor of the archerfish this time.

The really ****ty thing for shinano is that they spotted archerfish well before the sinking and a destroyer was closing to attack, and then ordered to break away to guard against a wolfpack that didn't exist. If the destroyer had just been allowed to attack, it's probable that archerfish would not have had a chance to engage.



As an interesting note though. If you look at the archerfish's patrol log (http://www.ussarcherfish.com/warptrl/patrol5.htm), you can see the archerfish was actually staying down during the day.

There's also a really unusual bit in that patrol log:
Quote:
The officers were given a ride around the island which was most interesting and appreciated.

The men went ashore in walking parties under officer supervision to lessen the danger of booby traps which were still around. Four men who inadvertently became separated from the rest started through a cane field. When one of the men heard rustling where his friends were not, he called “Halt” in his best Marine voice. With that 3 Jap soldiers jumped and ran leaving a loaded rifle, bayonet, medical kit, K rations, etc. as souvenirs. It is very fortunate that we don't have four casualties.
__________________
My SH4 LP
ColonelSandersLite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-15, 07:25 PM   #36
merc4ulfate
DILLIGAF
 
merc4ulfate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: florida
Posts: 2,058
Downloads: 210
Uploads: 0
Default

... and the E-27 did not even become operational until April of 1044. It was mainly installed on torpedo attack boats but some units were also installed on large combatant ships and submarines.

If you had planes in the skies then you could bombard the E-27 from multiple direction rendering it useless because it could not pinpoint individual emitters and would be completely blind.

If the Japanese had used triangulation methods to their advantage they could better pinpoint direct targets even getting bearing, range and heading with them ... but they failed in doing so.

The E-27 had a range of 180 miles but you also have to remember it was basically a funnel shaped device and while it could detect radar well before the radar detected the vessel the angle of the cone without triangulation left a huge field in which to guess where the enemy was.

Just as with the Germans it was mostly Arrogance that destroyed the Empire. The racial superiority at that time from both countries leaders failed to use equipment to their greatest extent.
__________________
Self-education is, I firmly believe, the only kind of education there is.
~Isaac Asimov~

Mercfulfate
将補
日本帝國海軍

merc4ulfate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-15, 07:40 PM   #37
Rockin Robbins
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: DeLand, FL
Posts: 8,899
Downloads: 135
Uploads: 52


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ColonelSandersLite View Post
I can see a few possible reasons for it.

First, bearing only plots are inaccurate and time consuming.

Secondly the archerfish failed the initial intercept. They deduced that shinano would return to original base course so archerfish changed course to intercept based on that. This would in effect ruin the shinanos estimation of archerfish's position. Leading to another inaccurate time consuming plot. It's not hard at all to imagine that shinano missestimated archerfish's position.

Third, shinano thought that archerfish was a diversion and the actual attack force was somewhere else. So which direction is actually safe?

Basically, the fog of war worked out in favor of the archerfish this time.

The really ****ty thing for shinano is that they spotted archerfish well before the sinking and a destroyer was closing to attack, and then ordered to break away to guard against a wolfpack that didn't exist. If the destroyer had just been allowed to attack, it's probable that archerfish would not have had a chance to engage.



As an interesting note though. If you look at the archerfish's patrol log (http://www.ussarcherfish.com/warptrl/patrol5.htm), you can see the archerfish was actually staying down during the day.

There's also a really unusual bit in that patrol log:
The entire Shinano incident was error compounding error, canceling out error, dumb luck intruding and BOOM! The book Shinano! is very interesting. Certainly shows that neither the Japanese nor the Americans were a super race of ultimate humans. Fate drew the cards, played the hand and delivered the blows.

It strikes me the same way as Sam Dealey and the Harder gaining the moniker "Destroyer Killer" and how that led to the death of the entire crew at the hands of a captured American minesweeper.
Rockin Robbins is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2024 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.