SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Sub/Naval + Other Games > Sub/Naval & General Games Discussion
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-12-13, 12:14 AM   #16
TorpX
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,975
Downloads: 153
Uploads: 11
Default

Quote:
I really do not like sims that do not have some form of true dynamic campaign.
This is my feeling as well. When I first started playing SHCE, I played the singles quite a lot. But once I learned the game and started a career, I hardly ever returned to the single missions.
TorpX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-13, 12:51 AM   #17
Oberon
Lucky Jack
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 25,976
Downloads: 61
Uploads: 20


Default

I think the only way they could do a dynamic campaign in a modern subsim would be in a manner similar to the old Red Storm Rising game. I mean, DW did try its hand at a dynamic campaign, but rather than a long patrol based campaign like SH3 it was really the results of one mission affecting the next and so on. Pretty limited and to be honest I think I only played two missions of the campaign before moving on to custom missions. I'm not really into the modern modern sub warfare, I'm a cold war man, boomer trailing in a 688i. The Seawolf is nice but just not my cup of tea, but I do like the Seahawk, the Orion is nice but lacks the dipping sonar of the Seahawk...which I keep forgetting to retract before I move to my next waypoint...
The Frigate...I still have no idea how to operate....
Oberon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-13, 07:11 AM   #18
Red October1984
Airplane Nerd
 
Red October1984's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,243
Downloads: 115
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oberon View Post
I think the only way they could do a dynamic campaign in a modern subsim would be in a manner similar to the old Red Storm Rising game. I mean, DW did try its hand at a dynamic campaign, but rather than a long patrol based campaign like SH3 it was really the results of one mission affecting the next and so on. Pretty limited and to be honest I think I only played two missions of the campaign before moving on to custom missions. I'm not really into the modern modern sub warfare, I'm a cold war man, boomer trailing in a 688i. The Seawolf is nice but just not my cup of tea, but I do like the Seahawk, the Orion is nice but lacks the dipping sonar of the Seahawk...which I keep forgetting to retract before I move to my next waypoint...
The Frigate...I still have no idea how to operate....
I THINK I can operate the subs. I don't know how detectable I am sometimes. I can't do much with the aircraft and the frigate....I can do some very basic stuff with it.

The P-3's MAD Sensor kinda makes up for not having dipping Sonar don't you think? I found it useful in the last mission I played with it.
__________________
Red October1984 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-13, 08:03 AM   #19
Skybird
Soaring
 
Skybird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: the mental asylum named Germany
Posts: 42,660
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TorpX View Post

This is my feeling as well. When I first started playing SHCE, I played the singles quite a lot. But once I learned the game and started a career, I hardly ever returned to the single missions.
It's called the falcon 4-experience.

However, two things.

First, scripted missions can be much more realistic since threy are indivkidually designed, and if the mission designers knows his stuff, his design will allways be more realistic, also more complex if desired, than anything a campaign generator can throw together.

Second, you can randomise a mission setup. That'S what I did in the days I used SC. I had a mission with I think ten potential submarine in a defined area, the arena, and had their positions and probability that they would show up randomised. I also had them in two teams. So every time I started the mission, it was a completely new setup and I could not know at all what was waiting for me, whether I had allied units or not and where they were, and whether I was hunting one enemy with four buddies, or was alone against a force of three. Also, every contact first established I had to identitfy to make sure whether it was Bue or Red team.

Summary: designing missions instead of having them generated, has advantages, and in SC, replay values of own missions can be increased tremendously by randomising them.
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert.
Skybird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-13, 09:38 AM   #20
Oberon
Lucky Jack
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 25,976
Downloads: 61
Uploads: 20


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Red October1984 View Post
I THINK I can operate the subs. I don't know how detectable I am sometimes. I can't do much with the aircraft and the frigate....I can do some very basic stuff with it.

The P-3's MAD Sensor kinda makes up for not having dipping Sonar don't you think? I found it useful in the last mission I played with it.
MAD is useful but you have to trianglate the location first, and get quite close to the contact before it starts twitching, whereas with the big dipper you can slap it down and work with the buoys to get a good triangulation and eventually work up a nice firm track.

I once managed to nail down a Kilo to the point that when I dropped the torpedo I near enough dropped it on the poor guys sail, I heard the explosion and sinking noises in the helicopter!
Oberon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-13, 09:10 PM   #21
Oberon
Lucky Jack
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 25,976
Downloads: 61
Uploads: 20


Default

688i masts are made in China...that's all I'm saying.
Oberon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-13, 12:14 AM   #22
Raptor1
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Stavka
Posts: 8,211
Downloads: 13
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oberon View Post
688i masts are made in China...that's all I'm saying.
The 688i's masts last even less than those of a French man-of-war.

In other news, I think I'm beginning to understand this TMA thing, so maybe next time my targeting solutions will be more based on hard data and less on completely random guesswork.
__________________
Current Eastern Front status: Probable Victory
Raptor1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-13, 05:39 AM   #23
Oberon
Lucky Jack
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 25,976
Downloads: 61
Uploads: 20


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raptor1 View Post
In other news, I think I'm beginning to understand this TMA thing, so maybe next time my targeting solutions will be more based on hard data and less on completely random guesswork.
The horror!
Oberon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-13, 09:42 AM   #24
Arclight
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Land of windmills, tulips, wooden shoes and cheese. Lots of cheese.
Posts: 8,467
Downloads: 53
Uploads: 10
Default

Next time I'll just park next to them. Snapshots seem to work.


What is the max speed for the radar mast anyway? Still surprised it failed at 5 kts.
__________________

Contritium praecedit superbia.
Arclight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-13, 10:12 AM   #25
Oberon
Lucky Jack
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 25,976
Downloads: 61
Uploads: 20


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arclight View Post
Next time I'll just park next to them. Snapshots seem to work.


What is the max speed for the radar mast anyway? Still surprised it failed at 5 kts.

*pulls out manual*

*rummages*


Aha, I think I found our problem.

Max depth for the radar in the 688 is 54ft. We were at 65ft when I put it up. ESM is 61ft, although why the ESM broke about five to ten minutes after I'd lowered it is less explainable.

Should we upgrade to Lwami before our next game? Which could be tonight if nothing else occurs before hand. I quite enjoyed last night.
Oberon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-13, 10:30 AM   #26
Arclight
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Land of windmills, tulips, wooden shoes and cheese. Lots of cheese.
Posts: 8,467
Downloads: 53
Uploads: 10
Default

That works, just yank my chain a bit if I'm distracted by D&D.

I'll stick with 65ft for peri and 50ft for the masts then. Pretty shallow though; starts to broach at 45ft.
__________________

Contritium praecedit superbia.
Arclight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-13, 10:40 AM   #27
Oberon
Lucky Jack
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 25,976
Downloads: 61
Uploads: 20


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arclight View Post
Pretty shallow though; starts to broach at 45ft.
That's what I thought, still...if you're painting stuff with Radar then exposing your sail a bit is probably going to be the least of your problems.

I'll download Lwami now then.
Oberon is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.