![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#16 | |||
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,140
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: At periscope depth in Lake Geneva
Posts: 3,512
Downloads: 25
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Ok I was wrong about the TIE fighters.
:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Rear Admiral
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,866
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Well, here is what the rest of the world though about this question:
http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/geekend/?p=522 -S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
The Old Man
![]() Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,448
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I recall from a few of the X-Wing novels that the wings served two purposes. First, in their deployed mode, they spread the cannons far enough apart that their high-powered discharges wouldn't damage each other. Second, they provided improved maneuverability during combat in atmosphere. Yes, with enough engines and repulsorlifts anything could fly, but not necessarily fly well. In one of the books they state that the TIE fighters lost all of the maneuverability advantages they had in the vacuum of space when fighting the skies, and the X-Wings were able to fly circles around them.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]()
Fatty is on the right track.
I have about as much sim-flight time in X-Wings as some around here have in say F-16s etc so... The S-Foils do four things. 1) Places the cannons away from each other and the hull so they don't damage the X-Wing. 2) Repulsors on each wing add to monuverablity in atmo. Think about an minature X-Wing hovering in mid air, push at the far end of one S-Foil and what happens compared to pushing near the engines. A repulsor at the end of the S-Foil has a more dramadic effect. 3) Heat disspation without compamizing atmospheric handeling, Eyeballs (TIE Fighters to you non-Starfight folk) have huge pannels to disspate heat, in atmo those pannels act like massive speedbreaks in turning manuvers forcing the pilot to bank and then turn. X-Wings don't simply because the S-Foils allow air to flow around them. 4) Weapons Placment. The cannon are farther away from center giving the pilot a bigger cone of fire. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 1,952
Downloads: 207
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I know that the TIE fighters "wings" were solar panels to charge weps and shields, probably something similar for the X-Wing too.:hmm:
I guess they couldn't really call it an X-Wing if it didn't have wings though. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 | |
Admiral
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,320
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Lucas wanted to capture WW2 aerial dogfighting in Star Wars. Just look at the movements of the x-wing fighters during the attack on the death star, the dives, the incoming flack, the tie fighters vs the x-wings its all reminescent of ww2 aerial dogfighting and bombing, think zeros against corsairs. In private showings of early edits of the film he actually used real ww2 footage to convey the kind of combat in space he was aspiring to depict in the final film. You shoud read the book : The making of Star Wars by J.W Rinzler. It discusses the whole Star Wars project from the early seventies up until the release in 1977. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|