![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#16 |
A-ganger
![]() Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 79
Downloads: 11
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
AS:
FPS's like Medal of Honor get far more resources allocated to them than SH4, because far more people buy FPS's than buy subsims. SH4's budget is likely to be only a fraction of Call of Duty III's. Also, in an FPS, the only thing the game has to calculate is the immediate action around the player. The U-boat in MOH was a static 3D enviroment with no working controls (not even hatches if I remember correctly.) And it wasn't rocking around either. In SH4, the game has to continuously calculate the movements of dozens of ships. This takes processing power, which leave less power available to calculate and redraw 3D environments such as the interior of the boat. Turning SH4 into an FPS like experience (walking to your sub, boarding it and moving around inside it) takes processing power away from the strategic part of the game. Why do you think 1914: Shells of Fury doesn't have a 3D interior, despite being a later game than SH3? And SH3 does have a 3D interior? Answer: The dev team of 1914: SOF had less resources (money and time) to create the game. SH4 itself is only a budget game compared to a leading FPS like Call of Duty III. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: May 2006
Location: 5 Miles Inland West Of Lake Huron
Posts: 1,936
Downloads: 139
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Only if it would include damage like nasty leaks that you could help repair, and having water pouring in from damaged seals and all the good stuff.
__________________
A legislative act contrary to the Constitution is not law. -John Marshall Chief Justice of the Supreme Court --------------------- |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
中国水兵
![]() Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 275
Downloads: 135
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
@Oesten:
seemingly good points, but not convincing to me. You CAN "move" inside and outside your boat pretty much like in a FPS using Shift+F2, which technically speaking consumes the same PC power than real "walking" like in a FPS. Considering how smoothly SH3 runs on my somewhat obsolete GeForce6600 card I don´t see why one or two additional compartments would double or triple the calculating time... Shells of Fury is just crap and can´t be compared to SH3. It´s not only a matter of low budget, it also a matter of bad programming. I played Shells of Fury and I can tell you the water looks as if it was from 1995, and yet the game doesn´t run smooth but is laggy - that´s just bad programming. Have a look at the graphics of virtual skipper, which are awesome, or look at the Indie sim (forgot the name) which comes on 60MB (!) install-package and has better wave graphics than SH3! My two cents, AS P.S.: why are some people so passionate when it comes to talking about which things are not do-able???
__________________
Whenever people agree with me I always feel I must be wrong. (Oscar Wilde) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Swansea
Posts: 3,903
Downloads: 204
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Well, it would be nice if they implemented things to do when in there, for example: Engine Room: Where you can speak to the Chief Mechanic and recharge the batteries whilst at surface (instead of telling the Chief Engineer in the Control Room) or check on fuel consumption Ward Room: Where you can write in a fully editable patrol log, or read files and documents related to your submarine (manuals, specifications?) Captains Cabin: Personal Diary? Listen to the grammophone, news broadcasts etc. What would be interesting, would be to introduce commander fatigue. Therefore, taking a rest in the cabin could regenerate stamina, otherwise, periscope accuracy and reaction times could be affected Torpedo Room: It would be nice if they modelled this and let you view maintenance reports for your torpedoes or could schedule checks to be carried out. You could also have a look at the general health and morale of your crew, perhaps Radio/Sonar: Apart from the obvious, it would be really cool if you could announce things to your crew and have it affect morale. For example "Contact Report Recieved" and then an option "Announce intent to attack" I dont know much about American submarines though, but those are a few ideas. ![]()
__________________
Well, here's another nice mess you've gotten me into. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Posts: 1,058
Downloads: 3
Uploads: 3
|
![]() Quote:
The biggest time consumer bits in modelling the whole submarine are research and the actual modelling. After that, you also need animations for the crew in those stations, which need to be adjusted for differences from sub to sub. A few states, lines of conversation. Do-able? Yes, but in what timeframe? Having skeletal animation makes animating the crew much easier and LESS memory intensive, also. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
Canadian Wolf
|
![]()
Eventually a full sub walkthrough will come. The game I think will evolve in that manner. Many games now offer a fully interactive enviroment, this one should be no different. I like what Seth posted, being able to walk up ladders, stuff like that, along with great gameplay and graphics.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Posts: 1,058
Downloads: 3
Uploads: 3
|
![]()
Yeah, me too, I'd love to see that.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | ||
Watch Officer
![]() Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Queensland, Australia
Posts: 339
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
A thread in the SH3 forums made me think about commander fatigue today. Here's what I had to say. Quote:
________ Brennda Last edited by IRONxMortlock; 08-14-11 at 02:30 PM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 | |
Helmsman
![]() Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Warren, Michigan
Posts: 109
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 0
|
What do we really look for in a Sim. A game or what it really was like?
Well I just returned to my base in Saipan - having been reassigned there from Pearl (August 1944) - from a patrol in the waters around the Palau Island chain. Sank 2 patrol boats and 7 merchant/troop transports in a running gun/torp. battle
![]() My son ![]() ![]() Playing SH I again brings up lot's of wishes that have been mentioned in this thread and many others in the past. However, there has been much on and off talk about the ability to move around inside your sub - as is the case in this thread. Reading AS's answer to other comments in regards to Hueywoff123's original statement concerning this issue: Quote:
1. It´s a waste of money and time. 2. Put the effort elsewhere. as AS also mentions, in his return comments further in this thread. I think if time and money were spent on additional internal views of the wardroom, radio room (at min.); it would add to the realism of the game. To view the Captain read an Ultra message and then order course and speed changes to intercept would be great. The external 3d views may be neat when at your base and your sub is preping for it's next patrol - watching torps being loaded, stores being loaded or the crew reading thier mail upon return from patrol would be nice; but while on the patrol it's only "eye candy", where as action in the wardroom and radio room would inhance the realism of what happens "behind" the scenes. Even views of the Capt. in his stateroom entering statements into the ships log (as could be done in SHII - though not in the stateroom per say) - would add to the sim. How about more realistic views of the bridge and maybe from the lookout percpetive. Hey how about the Skipper going to headquarters to receive and review his patrol orders with his commanding officer! Playing SHI - though compared to todays graphics and workings is on the low scale within a sim, shows it would be great to add features such as those mentioned above. I always took the map view, with the tiny red or black squares that would show up periodically on the map as a "Contact Report", as Ultra messages I have recieved regarding enemy ship movements that COMSUBPAC wanted me to know of so I could review my status/position and respond if able. Just one more comment. Having watched the "out takes" of what will be in the sim - control room and conning tower - it would be nice to see men going up the ladder to the tower when one would "CLICK" on to go there and it would be nice to see men in the tower. The sonar operator, the radar operator, the officer whose position during battle stations was the TDC, and the main helm position. (Mmm another point in favor of the new crew management system that has been mentioned. ![]() Oh well my 2 cents worth for what ever it's worth. Happy Hunting ![]() Last edited by Capt. D; 01-11-07 at 04:56 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|