![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#226 | |
Fleet Admiral
![]() |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#227 |
Shark above Space Chicken
|
![]()
Exactly. It's also possible Oswald just got lucky and got in a good shot. It happens you know.
__________________
"However vast the darkness, we must provide our own light." Stanley Kubrick "Tomorrow belongs to those who can hear it coming." David Bowie |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#228 |
Eternal Patrol
![]() |
![]()
Except for the number of facts he gets wrong, such as that Oswald did not fail his shooting in boot camp; he qualified Sharpshooter. Later he was downrated to Marksman. The writer also either ignores or was unaware of the fact that Oswald had been going to ranges and practicing. A lot.
He also gets the facts wrong about the change in the motorcade route. As we have already shown, there was no change. Elm street was the planned route all along. He also ignores or is unaware of the many recreations done in the intervening years, recreation in which experienced shooters, but not trained snipers, successfully made the three shots with little or no problems.
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.” —Rocky Russo |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#229 |
Eternal Patrol
![]() |
![]()
Pictures or it didn't happen.
On second thought, no pictures please. I'll take your word for it.
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.” —Rocky Russo |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#230 |
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
![]()
A Mil adjustment to most scopes is a 1/4 inch at 100 yards.
(One of mine is 1/8th inch at 100 yards ![]() The shot was done at less. Right around 88+ yards? On a slow moveing target where the line of travel is known. By a somewhat better then average shooter. Oswald could have pulled it off. Only thing I dispute is the shot from the front as the kill shot. I see the shot from the back as the kill shot. Do I believe Oswald was the only shooter? I'm not convinced no. I believe there may have been another shooter but not in front of JFK. Above Oswald would be the position I would take knowiing he was to be the patsy. Another thing about Snipers? If one tells you they never missed? They are liars of the first degree or ain't been in the field. |
![]() |
![]() |
#231 |
Eternal Patrol
![]() |
![]()
As with many things, I neither believe nor disbelieve. I certainly believe Oswald could have made those shots. I also realize that it could have been a conspiracy by any number of different people or groups. Anything is possible.
I simply refuse to listen to people telling me they know this or that, and that I have to believe their version. If they want me to believe, they'd best come up with some real evidence. So far I haven't seen any.
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.” —Rocky Russo |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#232 |
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#233 | |
Sonar Guy
![]() Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Matalava Island
Posts: 378
Downloads: 59
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
If Oswald missed the limousine on his second shot, what is the probability that he would have made the necessary corrections to hit the president in the back of the head on his third shot? And if his first shot missed the entire limousine, a rather large automobile and at the closest distance of the three shots, what is the probability that he would have improved in a few seconds to hit the president directly in the back of the head? I suppose the point I was trying to make to BubbleHead is he doesn't necessarily have to have all the answers to prove a conspiracy, all one has to look at is Oswald's ability to make the three shots. I respect your opinion if you don't think it was a conspiracy as I don't know for sure. My opinion is it is a very low percentage that Oswald acted alone. But possible? Yes. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#234 |
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
![]()
If you want to go the path of "Don't know for sure"?
Lincoln's assassination is full of loop holes. Could Booth have been a decoy and the shot was fired from elsewhere? Say his BodyGuard? ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#235 | |
Fleet Admiral
![]() |
![]() Quote:
As privateer so eloquently put it Occams Razor. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#236 |
Chief of the Boat
|
![]()
More housework for Nancy Lady
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#237 | ||
Eternal Patrol
![]() |
![]() Quote:
Quote:
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.” —Rocky Russo |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#238 |
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,288
Downloads: 85
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
My problem with multiple shooters is how could the conspirators guarantee the only bullets or fragments found would be the ones traceable to Oswald's weapon to the exclusion of all other weapons in the world? How could they guarantee there wouldn't be wounds that don't track back to the sixth floor SE corner window of the Depository?
That is why the conspiracy theorists find it necessary to enlarge the conspiracy. With all the wounds, bullets and fragments only pointing to Oswald's rifle from Oswald's vantage place, to make things fit they must conjecture a larger conspiracy to alter the wounds, alter the x-rays and photos, and plant or substitute (or both!) bullets and fragments that point to Oswald from the originals which, they believe, would point elsewhere. And of course, since the Z-film doesn't show this supposed damage to the head that should be evident from a knoll shot, it too has now become part of the evidence that has been altered, they argue. As always, everyone has to be in on it. Doctors, nurses, forensic investigators etc. No Occams razor here. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#239 |
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#240 |
Chief of the Boat
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|