Should the SJ radar only reach out 5km?

Nisgeis · 04-30-08, 12:46 PM

Did they say 5 miles, instead of 5 km? Effective radar range depends on lots of factors, including speed, amount of superstructure, course, sea state. bobbing of the target, height over horizon etcetera. Sometimes atmospheric conditions cand help, or hinder range too. The power output of the radar also helps increase range, as the stronger the outgoing signal, the stronger the echo.

Paraphrased from U.S. Submarines through 1945. An illustrated Design History.:

The first SJ radar attack was conducted by the USS Haddock on 22nd August 1942. She had hit a transport, which had fled the area and the Haddock surfaced and pursued. It was a moonless night, so she had to rely on her SJ Radar. She detected the target at 13,000 yards (approx 12km or 6.5 nautical miles), tracked it, closed and sank it at 1,300 yards.

SJ was upgraded to SJ-a starting in the summer of 1942, this involved adding a PPI scope and and a variable trainiing mechanism, then a year later radar was upgraded to SJ-1 in the summer of 1943. This had 50% more power and consequently more range. Quoted ranges for the SJ-1 is 12 nm for a battleship and 5nm for a submarine (small target).

Radar changed the way attacks were made as it allowed attacks at night with no light with conditions favourable to the submarine. Attacking on the surface gives much more flexibility in the way you conduct your attack. In 1942 when few submarines had radar, 30% of attacks were conducted on the surface at night (preferably attacking from a direction that put the moon in a favourable position to light the targets, but not the submarine). In 1944, surface attacks at night accounted for 57% of all attacks and at the end of the war many COs passed up daylight opportunities to take advantage of better conditions at night.

EDIT: I remember reading a war patrol, where it said they picked up a BB at a range of 36,000 yards and that this was noted as exceptional performance. I think it was one of the USS Pampanito's late war patrols.

M. Sarsfield · 04-30-08, 01:34 PM

I find it ironic that COs were getting picky about daylight attacks at the end of the war when it was getting harder and harder to find targets of opportunity.

fireship4 · 04-30-08, 04:24 PM

what is the maximum visual range in nm then? I've always taken it to be 20...

Fincuan · 04-30-08, 05:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nisgeis

I remember reading a war patrol, where it said they picked up a BB at a range of 36,000 yards and that this was noted as exceptional performance. I think it was one of the USS Pampanito's late war patrols.

USS Sealion II's encounter with Kongo also matches that criteria:

Quote:

Originally Posted by http://www.combinedfleet.com/kongo.htm

Formosa Strait. At 0020, LtCdr (later Vice Admiral) Eli Reich's USS SEALION II (SS-315) makes radar contact at 44,000 yards. The sky is overcast with 1,500 yards visibility and the sea is calm. Reich begins an approach. He goes ahead flank on four engines. By 0043, he has four radar contacts at 35,000 yards. Reich identifies the targets as two battleships and two heavy cruisers. The targets are moving in column with the "cruiser" (actually, KONGO) ahead followed by two battleships (NAGATO and YAMATO) and a cruiser astern ( YAHAGI). All are on course 060 (T), speed 16 knots and not zigzagging.

At 0146, three escorts become visible on radar at 20,000 yards

Ducimus · 04-30-08, 05:19 PM

Varying accounts and sources is why i haven't touched the surface radar much.

tater · 04-30-08, 05:32 PM

It's really line of sight limited.

The primary benefit being it can see in weather conditions (or night) when visual detection would not be possible. It gets a few hundred yards farther than eyes because the radar is likely a couple meters above the watch crew. It also might get a return off a mast or something that might be missed visually in marginal conditions.

tater

04-30-08, 01:34 PM	#2
M. Sarsfield Ace of the Deep Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Tulsa, OK Posts: 1,016 Downloads: 0 Uploads: 0	I find it ironic that COs were getting picky about daylight attacks at the end of the war when it was getting harder and harder to find targets of opportunity. __________________ MJS USS Batfish Volunteer/Reenactor www.ss310.com www.ussbatfish.com Communism killed over 100M people and all that I got was this lousy signature.* *http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/COM.ART.HTM

04-30-08, 04:24 PM	#3
fireship4 Ensign Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: United Kingdom Posts: 221 Downloads: 41 Uploads: 0	what is the maximum visual range in nm then? I've always taken it to be 20... __________________ Rest in peace Dave

04-30-08, 12:46 PM	#1
Nisgeis Ocean Warrior Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 2,909 Downloads: 77 Uploads: 11	Did they say 5 miles, instead of 5 km? Effective radar range depends on lots of factors, including speed, amount of superstructure, course, sea state. bobbing of the target, height over horizon etcetera. Sometimes atmospheric conditions cand help, or hinder range too. The power output of the radar also helps increase range, as the stronger the outgoing signal, the stronger the echo. Paraphrased from *U.S. Submarines through 1945. An illustrated Design History*.: The first SJ radar attack was conducted by the USS Haddock on 22nd August 1942. She had hit a transport, which had fled the area and the Haddock surfaced and pursued. It was a moonless night, so she had to rely on her SJ Radar. She detected the target at 13,000 yards (approx 12km or 6.5 nautical miles), tracked it, closed and sank it at 1,300 yards. SJ was upgraded to SJ-a starting in the summer of 1942, this involved adding a PPI scope and and a variable trainiing mechanism, then a year later radar was upgraded to SJ-1 in the summer of 1943. This had 50% more power and consequently more range. Quoted ranges for the SJ-1 is 12 nm for a battleship and 5nm for a submarine (small target). Radar changed the way attacks were made as it allowed attacks at night with no light with conditions favourable to the submarine. Attacking on the surface gives much more flexibility in the way you conduct your attack. In 1942 when few submarines had radar, 30% of attacks were conducted on the surface at night (preferably attacking from a direction that put the moon in a favourable position to light the targets, but not the submarine). In 1944, surface attacks at night accounted for 57% of all attacks and at the end of the war many COs passed up daylight opportunities to take advantage of better conditions at night. EDIT: I remember reading a war patrol, where it said they picked up a BB at a range of 36,000 yards and that this was noted as exceptional performance. I think it was one of the USS Pampanito's late war patrols.

04-30-08, 05:19 PM	#5
Ducimus Rear Admiral Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 12,987 Downloads: 67 Uploads: 2	Varying accounts and sources is why i haven't touched the surface radar much.

04-30-08, 05:32 PM	#6
tater Navy Seal Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: New Mexico, USA Posts: 9,023 Downloads: 8 Uploads: 2	It's really line of sight limited. The primary benefit being it can see in weather conditions (or night) when visual detection would not be possible. It gets a few hundred yards farther than eyes because the radar is likely a couple meters above the watch crew. It also might get a return off a mast or something that might be missed visually in marginal conditions. tater