Mk-23 Torpedoes?!

Rockin Robbins · 04-19-08, 12:03 PM

Nope! They are also slightly more reliable than the Mark 14s. As the war goes on the Mark 23s don't cost anything and are well worth using because of their increased reliability. As long as they cost renown, I'd just stick with the Mark 14.

V.C. Sniper · 04-19-08, 07:17 PM

I prefer the slow speed setting on the awesome Mark 14.

LukeFF · 04-19-08, 07:19 PM

The Mark 23 was exact same thing as the Mark 14, except that it lacked the slow-speed setting. It didn't last long in service because, as the war progressed and Japanese ASW improved, submarines had to fire shots from farther away, hence the need for the low-speed setting.

04-19-08, 12:03 PM	#1
Rockin Robbins Navy Seal Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: DeLand, FL Posts: 8,900 Downloads: 135 Uploads: 52	Nope! They are also slightly more reliable than the Mark 14s. As the war goes on the Mark 23s don't cost anything and are well worth using because of their increased reliability. As long as they cost renown, I'd just stick with the Mark 14. __________________ Sub Skipper's Bag of Tricks, Slightly Subnuclear Mk 14 & Cutie, Slightly Subnuclear Deck Gun, EZPlot 2.0, TMOPlot, TMOKeys, SH4CMS

04-19-08, 07:17 PM	#2
V.C. Sniper Watch Officer Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 339 Downloads: 1 Uploads: 0	I prefer the slow speed setting on the awesome Mark 14. __________________ I only need one torpedo.

04-19-08, 07:19 PM	#3
LukeFF Silent Hunter Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Riverside, California Posts: 3,610 Downloads: 41 Uploads: 5	The Mark 23 was exact same thing as the Mark 14, except that it lacked the slow-speed setting. It didn't last long in service because, as the war progressed and Japanese ASW improved, submarines had to fire shots from farther away, hence the need for the low-speed setting. __________________ ROW Sound Effects Contributor RFB Team Leader