SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-02-07, 05:47 AM   #1
TteFAboB
Admiral
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,247
Downloads: 4
Uploads: 0
Default

How defended is the SSK's dock?
__________________
"Tout ce qui est exagéré est insignifiant." ("All that is exaggerated is insignificant.") - Talleyrand
TteFAboB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-07, 07:11 AM   #2
Herr_Pete
Commodore
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Scotland, UK
Posts: 623
Downloads: 102
Uploads: 0
Default

Dont the Germans have the most advanced submarine out at the moment, i read somehwere on this site they had the most technoloicaly advanced submarine?
Herr_Pete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-07, 03:38 PM   #3
Sea Demon
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 2,552
Downloads: 33
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Herr_Pete
Dont the Germans have the most advanced submarine out at the moment, i read somehwere on this site they had the most technoloicaly advanced submarine?
I'm not sure, but there are a number of subs that could stand in this category. If you want to talk about packing the most new technology per square inch, combined with overall performance, I'm not so sure that the German's latest conventional subs would stand up to that. I do however think that these German subs have some of the most, if not the most innovative propulsion, and quieting measures ever built into a submarine. In their environment, they would be utterly difficult to detect and defeat. While the 212's 214 may be the most advanced in the category of conventional submarines, the Virginia and Astute's are not to be taken lightly by any means. There have been tremendous innovations built into them as well. Of course, they are nuclear subs, and could be taken into another category of submarine as their operations would be different that what the 212 would do.

I think it is truly hard to measure most advanced sub because of the difficulty in knowing what they can actually do in their classified stats. But all in all, I wouldn't be surprised if the German subs had the most innovations built into them, awarding them that honor.
Sea Demon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-07, 04:05 PM   #4
Skybird
Soaring
 
Skybird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: the mental asylum named Germany
Posts: 42,815
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sea Demon
Quote:
Originally Posted by Herr_Pete
Dont the Germans have the most advanced submarine out at the moment, i read somehwere on this site they had the most technoloicaly advanced submarine?
I'm not sure, but there are a number of subs that could stand in this category. If you want to talk about packing the most new technology per square inch, combined with overall performance, I'm not so sure that the German's latest conventional subs would stand up to that. I do however think that these German subs have some of the most, if not the most innovative propulsion, and quieting measures ever built into a submarine. In their environment, they would be utterly difficult to detect and defeat. While the 212's 214 may be the most advanced in the category of conventional submarines, the Virginia and Astute's are not to be taken lightly by any means. There have been tremendous innovations built into them as well. Of course, they are nuclear subs, and could be taken into another category of submarine as their operations would be different that what the 212 would do.

I think it is truly hard to measure most advanced sub because of the difficulty in knowing what they can actually do in their classified stats. But all in all, I wouldn't be surprised if the German subs had the most innovations built into them, awarding them that honor.
I would put the Swedish Gotland class beside that German type 212/214. Both are a class of their own currently, it seems to me. BTW, the boat the US navy has leased in order to train against it, is a Gotland class. After over one year, or is it even already two?, the Navy still sees the score to nil against it. If you are up against a Gotland or 212, you are most likely sitting on the loosing end of the deal.

Sweden is a top inventor and producer of military equipment. Often they produced a worldwide first in the past, and came up with ideas that were seen in the West just some years later.
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert.

Last edited by Skybird; 12-02-07 at 04:51 PM.
Skybird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-07, 08:39 PM   #5
gimpy117
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Kalamazoo, MI
Posts: 3,243
Downloads: 108
Uploads: 0
Default

yeah... iran is playing a war of words, and just trying to make life hard for us by messing around with "new devlopments in tech" (like the enriched Urainium issue). theres no doubt that the sub is using modern tech (at least more modern than other irainian subs) but i also highly doubt it has sonar avoiding tech. probabbly it's a half truth, and, it has design to make it more stealthy than it's predecessors.

in a nutshell, iran is just screwing with us, heck maybe they don't even have it deployed in the gulf at all and want us to go on a wild goose chase. (maybe they don't even have it at all and it's just a dressed up older sub)
gimpy117 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.