I'm shamed to be Norwegian..(Al gore gets the peace prize)

[micky1up]

Originally Posted by waste gate

Because 'big AL's' is based on untruths. The machine gun is based on the truth.

I suspect untruths have and will kill more people than the machine gun ever has, or ever will.

wrong!

[Tchocky]

Originally Posted by micky1up

wrong!

"I will not invade Czechoslovakia!"

(It's been a while since the appeasement parade )

[Sea Demon]

So Al Gore, who is an obvious fraud got the worthless Nobel prize. Big deal. I lost total repsect for this prize when Yasser Arafat got it. This Nobel prize is now used to push progressive agendas. It's actually a shame. It used to be noteworthy once upon a time ago to win this. But I also find the following interesting....

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sh...nvenient-truth

Inaccuracies in Gore's film???? You don't say.

http://www.unionleader.com/article.aspx?headline=Gore's+prize%3A+A+fraud+on+t he+people&articleId=c55c0e3e-f569-4b50-83f6-8431bde279dd

The Nobel Peace Prize instructed that it go "to the person who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between the nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses." And Gore has exactly none of those things. Really? That's interesting... :hmm:


http://www.smh.com.au/news/environme...696238792.html

A meteorologist says Gore doesn't know what the hell he's talking about???!?!

Kid's are getting brainwashed???? You don't say.

[bradclark1]

So Al Gore, who is an obvious fraud got the worthless Nobel prize. Big deal. I lost total repsect for this prize when Yasser Arafat got it. This Nobel prize is now used to push progressive agendas. It's actually a shame. It used to be noteworthy once upon a time ago to win this. But I also find the following interesting....
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sh...nvenient-truth

Seems these people have selective editing techniques. This is from the link supplied by these people.

http://www.boston.com/news/local/art...pe_on_climate/
DNA hints warm era didn't melt entire cap
Scientists not involved in the study cautioned, however, that current climate change is so driven by pollution from power plants, industry, and other human activity that it is nearly impossible to draw a meaningful conclusion about the durability of Greenland's ice.
"Whatever occurred in the past almost surely occurred much more slowly," said Raymond S. Bradley, director of the Climate System Research Center at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst. "Human activity is pushing warming at a much faster rate than in the past. Change is occurring in decades or centuries, not over millennia."

Onto the next.

http://www.unionleader.com/article.aspx?headline=Gore's+prize%3A+A+fraud+on+t he+people&articleId=c55c0e3e-f569-4b50-83f6-8431bde279dd
The Nobel Peace Prize instructed that it go "to the person who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between the nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses." And Gore has exactly none of those things. Really? That's interesting...

Seems these people are selective also

http://nobelprize.org/alfred_nobel/w...estamente.html
Alfred Nobel's greatness lay in his ability to combine the penetrating mind of the scientist and inventor with the forward-looking dynamism of the industrialist. Nobel was very interested in social and peace-related issues and held what were considered radical views in his era. He had a great interest in literature and wrote his own poetry and dramatic works. The Nobel Prizes became an extension and a fulfillment of his lifetime interests.
When his will was opened it came as a surprise that his fortune was to be used for Prizes in Physics, Chemistry, Physiology or Medicine, Literature and Peace. The executors of his will were two young engineers, Ragnar Sohlman and Rudolf Lilljequist. They set about forming the Nobel Foundation as an organization to take care of the financial assets left by Nobel for this purpose and to coordinate the work of the Prize-Awarding Institutions. This was not without its difficulties since the will was contested by relatives and questioned by authorities in various countries.

http://www.smh.com.au/news/environme...696238792.html
A meteorologist says Gore doesn't know what the hell he's talking about???!?!
Kid's are getting brainwashed???? You don't say.

Sorry again. Not what the judge said. I could email a pdf of the courts findings if you would like.

“The Film advances four main scientific hypotheses, each
of which is very well supported by research published in
respected, peer-reviewed journals and accords with the
latest conclusions of the IPCC:
(1) global average temperatures have been rising
significantly over the past half century and are likely to
continue to rise (“climate change”);
(2) climate change is mainly attributable to man-made
emissions of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide
(“greenhouse gases”);
(3) climate change will, if unchecked, have significant
adverse effects on the world and its populations; and
(4) there are measures which individuals and
governments can take which will help to reduce climate
change or mitigate its effects.”

[Sea Demon]

Same thing here. No proof or consensus on the man-made apocalyptic "global warming" madness...er...scenarios. And nothing you posted proves Gore deserves the award as intended by it's founders. You missed the whole point of what I posted entirely. Debunk what I had with things that I can just as easily debunk with something else later. No consensus, and it seems Gore's film is an inaccurate piece of work. Piece of something else I might add...

[bradclark1]

You missed the whole point of.........

:rotfl: I missed no point at all. I proved all your err information false or selectively edited to put a spin on it. You want to ignore that, thats your call.

man-made apocalyptic "global warming" madness

Hallucinating too. I don't think anyone here has made any apocalyptic statements.

Gore's film is an inaccurate piece of work.

Read my comments immediately before your comment. The one where the judge gave his finding. Or you can just ignore that too.

[Sea Demon]

Originally Posted by bradclark1

:rotfl: I missed no point at all. I proved all your err information false or selectively edited to put a spin on it. You want to ignore that, thats your call.

Hallucinating too. I don't think anyone here has made any apocalyptic statements.

Read my comments immediately before your comment. The one where the judge gave his finding. Or you can just ignore that too.

:rotfl::rotfl:Actually you did no such thing. You posted OPINION only. Which can be proven err by providing other sources which puts your pieces or opinions in question. You totally miss the point. Like I said, there is no consensus by science that man-made "global warming" hysterics are warranted. And you didn't read the proper link. The link was regarding a meteorologist who thinks Al Gore is full of bunk. But you can continue to ignore those things as well.