Electronic privacy.

[jumpy]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/liv...e_id=1770&ct=5

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.../01/view01.xml

http://www.yourrights.org.uk/your-ri...rivate-a.shtml

http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2000...00023_en_2#pt1

In light of the above, I proudly announce my new email signature to replace the old 'Regards, Jumpy' to 'bomb bomb bomb president bomb bomb bomb nuke bomb terror organisation bomb bomb infiltrate bomb bomb prime minister bomb bomb bomb suitcase bomb bomb detonators and fertiliser bomb bomb bomb'.
I will also be appending any text messages with a template of the same, and I intend to end every phone call with 'bomb' instead of good-bye. :rotfl:

As someone else said [whining government toadie voice]but if you've got nothing to hide then you have nothing to fear[/whining government toadie voice]. GHAK!

And just because you're not doing anything wrong, doesn't make you innocent. There are few things you say, that can't be misinterpreted. In the wrong context, your opinions can be made to mean almost anything. How often does it happen here? Two people saying the same thing different ways, arguing the same message from different perspectives?

I find the whole thing disturbing. I know we've had ECHELON for a good while now, but that was only for government and military use, not for your local council or any number of incompetent public sector workers to snoop into. What do our local councils have to do with fighting terrorism, unless they're collecting benefits eh?

Time to start sending my emails via enigma encryption again I think, not crack proof but will waste any time for any monkey interested enough to bother deciphering my daily chatting.

Ah well, perhaps it's time to start accepting life under crushing poverty and oppression. Why people want to come to the uk to live any more is completely beyond me.

/casts unsettled glance at the door.

Originally Posted by from another forum

All I have done in my earlier post is quoted things in the Press used to describe a "terrorist suspect".

Most of those can be found by simply wandering a normal home. *references to substances used in 'home made bombmaking'*

The excuse was that the items painted a picture of the person concerned.
A picture that suited the needs of the person doing the painting.

Lets not forget the trials of the "oyster card" a boon to shoppers as you no longer have to carry cash for your purchases.

Trackable too.

Ah yes Mr Smith, you are claiming incapacity benefit, yet you purchased a sandwich in Nottingham on the 27th of September. What was the purpose of your visit to Town? Were you fit to work on that day if you were fit enough to travel to Town?
How did you get there, and how do you afford it on the £57 we pay you a week?


The Police have previously admitted that motorway cameras were used for surveillance of vehicles around a target vehicle; to catch criminals who may be travelling together, how many pieces of a picture make an incorrect one?